> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:15:08 -0700
> From: Randy Bush
> Subject: Re: Spamhaus flags any IP announced by our ASN as a criminal network
>
(...)
>
> we reject automagically on spamhaus, mail-abuse.org, and sorbs. really
> appreciate their services.
>
> randy
>
Sorbs? Really? *doh*
#m
> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:18:18 -0400
> From: David Andersen
> Subject: Re: NTP Server
(...)
> If you find yourself needing really precise time with good guarantees,
> you're not just talking about buying one GPS unit -- you can easily go
> down a rathole of finding multiple units with good hol
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:41:00 -0800
> From: Leo Bicknell
> Subject: Low end, cool CPE.
>
> I've run into a number of low end CPE situations lately where I
> haven't found anything that does what I want, but I have to believe
> it is out there. I'm hoping NANOG can help.
> (...)
> What is the
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:47:44 -0500
> From: William Herrin
> Subject: Re: The scale of streaming video on the Internet.
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
(...)
> But there's a third mechanism worth considering as well: the caching
> proxy.
IMHO it is a waste of bandwidth to use IP/netwo
> -Original Message-
> From: "Bill Lewis"
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:15:55
> To:
> Subject: Public Wireless access (ticket / token / schedule based)
>
> What is everyone using for enterprise grade wireless authentication for
> simple public access (i.e. users that are non-employee that
> I'm trying to help a company I work for to pass an audit, and we've
> been told we need trusted NTP sources (RedHat doesn't cut it). Being
> located in Nigeria, Africa, I'm not very knowledgeable about trusted
> sources therein.
>
> Please can anyone help with sources that wouldn't mind letting
> My questions are:
>
> - Will we be sacrificing quality if we spring for Cogent?
> (yesterday's Cogent/Verizon thread provided some cold chills for my spine)
Jehova!
Popcorn!
:-)
We used Cogent for some time. We dropped them, but not for poor quality (au
contraire) but for other m
Hi,
can anyone provide a dd-image from a CF card from a Catalyst 6500 with Sup720,
please.
We have a refurbished 6500 w/ Sup720-3BXL with an old rommon which is not able
to format a CF card.
(various other methods with formatting FAT16 on Linux etc. did not work; google
search only pointed to
Hi,
it seems that many large providers are using cloudmark services. As far as I
can tell: their policy is unclear, they can hardly be reached, mails to support
are bouncing (delayed, then bounce).
yes, the mailserver from one of our customers was blocked and this was OK and
rightful, because
> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:31:08 -0400
> From: Chris Conn
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: cloudmark?
> Message-ID: <5164262c.3070...@b2b2c.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote:
> >
(...)
> Your experience does not mirror
Bryan,
nope, it didn't make it through to my inbox . I try to contact you through
other channels.
Martin
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:41:42 +
> From: Bryan Williams
> To: "nanog@nanog.org"
> Subject: NANOG - csi reset request
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
e off-list), martin
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:43:57 +
> From: Martin Hotze
> To: "nanog@nanog.org"
> Cc: "bwilli...@cloudmark.com"
> Subject: RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 63, Issue 45
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-a
Hi,
the wireless itself is not the big problem, most of your devices (Mac) will be
the problem (BTDTGNS). And my wild guess is that mobile phones will also be
mostly iphones, plus some ipads.
ZyXEL has good WLAN controllers, as does LANCOM. Both have very good products
for the money. No need -
...@anuragbhatia.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Martin Hotze
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: enterprise 802.11
(...)
You need to do a bit of site survey to get idea of how many AP's you really
need. Remember it's open spectrum and running different bands from adjacent
AP&
> From: Leonardo Arena
> To: Graham Johnston
> Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'"
>
> Il giorno lun, 14/09/2015 alle 14.53 +, Graham Johnston ha scritto:
> > Today we use a product from MultiTech Systems call MultiModem iSMS to
> send SMS text messages from our monitoring system to our on call staff.
> From: Joe Greco
> Subject: Re: Windows 10 Release
>
> > You can download an ISO and burn it to install... Guessing if your
> > upgrading multiple machines, that would be the way to go...
>
> You don't even need to burn it to install. Just mount the ISO and
> run setup.exe
I've searched, but
> From: STARNES, CURTIS [mailto:curtis.star...@granburyisd.org]
> https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10 is the
> download URL.
> This site launches the Download Tool so the ISO can be downloaded from
> Microsoft.
Yeah, I know. But is it allowed to redistribute the .iso File
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:11:23 -0400
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> Subject: Re: Trivium
>
> On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:42 , Blake Dunlap wrote:
>
> > Without Google, how do you know where anything even *is*?
>
> Pretending that wasn't a troll, I wonder how much of the traffic these
> days is t
> From: Jeroen Massar
> To: s...@circlenet.us, nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Help me make sense of these traceroutes please
>
> On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
> > Hello Nanog community,
> > I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
> > seeing.
>
> You are likel
Hi,
looking at the specs of Mikrotik Cloud Core Routers it seems to be to good to
be true [1] having so much bang for the bucks. So virtually all smaller ISPs
would drop their CISCO gear for Mikrotik Routerboards.
We are using a handful of Mikrotik boxes, but on a much lower network level
(spl
iday, December 27, 2013 10:03 AM
> To: Martin Hotze
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?
>
> I am going to be deploying 4 as edge routers in the next few weeks, each
> will have 1 or 2 full tables plus partial IX tables. S
> > On 27/12/2013, at 10:13 pm, Martin Hotze wrote:
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > estimated traffic levels are at about half a gig, but at least 50 megs
> of UDP (VoIP) in both directions.
> >
> > one thing is that I haven't found a solution for red
> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:17:36 -0400
> From: Jared Mauch
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Glue Records at Dotster / Domain.com
>
> Opensrs also suffers from lack of v6 glue disease. Last I saw on their
> forums it said "coming soon" for about a year.
IBTD. We register our domains with them (Tucows/OpenSRS)
> -Original Message-
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:24:38 +
> From: Nathan Eisenberg
> Subject: RE: yahoo crawlers hammering us
> To: "nanog@nanog.org"
> Message-ID:
> <8c26a4fdae599041a13eb499117d3c28164ac...@ex-mb-
> 1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
>
> Customers don't want
> -Original Message-
> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:54:20 -0700
> From: Charles N Wyble
> Subject: NOC Automation / Best Practices
> To: nanog@nanog.org
>
> NOGGERS,
>
> (...)
> The way I see it, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
> Along
> those lines, I'm putting in some m
Oh well,
there's an approach where one splits users into "residential" and
"business", meaning that "residential" is only downloading, surfing,
... without need of providing any services "back" to the 'net. At
least with IPv6 one has to rethink this position as there finally is
end-to-end communic
> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:25:22 -0700
> From: Jeroen van Aart
> Subject: Re: legacy /8
> To: NANOG list
> Message-ID: <4bb66ed2.6080...@mompl.net>
>
> Cutler James R wrote:
> > I also just got a fresh box of popcorn. I will sit by and wait
>
> I honestly am not trying to be a troll. It's jus
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:13:31 -0700
> From: Owen DeLong
> Subject: Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
> To: fredrik danerklint
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:27 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
>
> > The problem is not all on Microsoft at this case.
> >
> >
> > For
> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Subject: Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
> To: Tim Chown
> Cc: NANOG list
(...)
> Not saying that Apple is perfect, but at least their IPv6-related bugs
> don't ruin the day for others on the LAN.
Let them (Apple) finally (*dooohhh*) fix the 2.4GHz/DH
29 matches
Mail list logo
