> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:31:08 -0400 > From: Chris Conn <cc...@b2b2c.ca> > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: cloudmark? > Message-ID: <5164262c.3070...@b2b2c.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote: > > (...) > Your experience does not mirror mine at all. I have less than 30
good for you. :-) > minutes of wait time for any support case, and they are few and far > between. Reliability is high and FP rate is low. I have no idea what > your reference to lawyers pertains to, however the only issue we have > ever had was for them to take our money when we renewed for the > umpteenth time. We are not a paying cloudmark customer. We just want to get one of our IPv4 address off of their list. #m
