Because most of the net libertarians insist that they should do
whatever they want and everyone else should help cater to them.
Liberty for me but not for thee.
On 7/27/09, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, William Pitcock wrote:
>
>> It is widely known that AT&T loves censorship. They lo
Yeah, google search is broken everywhere in the world right now.
http://isc.sans.org
On 1/31/09, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
>
>> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to
>> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google.
>>
>>
Error is fixed and seems to be propogating to resolution
On 1/31/09, Nathan Malynn wrote:
> Not only that, but the gMail logo is missing from my gMail for Domains page.
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frank wrote:
>> confirmed. same here manila, philippines.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1
Communication of rules is fair... I was criticizing the "net
neutrality" argument. They should communicate the rules, I agree.
On 10/19/07, Justin M. Streiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, John C. A. Bambenek wrote:
>
> > Since when did priva
27;t evict you or otherwise take action because you're
having loud parties and throwing appliances out windows. P2P is about
the exact opposite of "quiet enjoyment".
j
On 10/19/07, Patrick Giagnocavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:42 PM, John C.
Since when did private companies no longer have the right to regulate
their own property?
I must have missed the Amendment...
(Yeah, ok, I exaggerated the 99%)
On 10/19/07, Mark Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/19/07, John C. A. Bambenek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
ces - An NPSI Company
> 2591 Wexford-Bayne Road, Suite 400
> Sewickley, PA 15143
> Tel: 724-933-9540
> Fax: 724-933-9888
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: http://www.nauticom.net
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
I love how the framed it as "data discrimination". Let's just be
honest... 99% of it was illegal traffic taking up far more than their
fair share of bandwidth.
On 10/19/07, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-Data-Discrimination
he debate doesn't effect me.
PPS I think it was requested multiple times to take this debate off
list, let's let it die.
On 10/20/07, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 10:53 PM, John C. A. Bambenek wrote:
>
> > Because you signed
Count me in.
There is no reason to limit our defenses to the one thing that we
think is important at one instance in time... attackers change and
adapt and multimodal defense is simply good policy.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM,
"> I do not think it is appropriate for ISPs to have to prove or demonstrate the
> legitimacy of their customer base"
Here is the exact point of contention and the point where I think
people disagree. ISPs are the **first** line of defense against
malware and badware. They are the ones closest t
So, wll you be turning off your firewall and removing your router
passwords first to be the test case?
On 9/25/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> let's push this stuff back into the nation-states who sponsor
>> it and then use treaties to wall it off inside those places.
>
> Let
12 matches
Mail list logo
