The internet that is subsidized by that same Government
Logic.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 18:19 Mel Beckman wrote:
> Bill,
>
> It’s the INTERNET that is civilian, not the IP space. As long as that IP
> space was isolated to the .mil network, it was private space, as far as the
> Internet was c
My first question is how are you running 14 code on that hardware??
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 20:12 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) <
lyn...@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> Nick Suan via NANOG writes:
> > I was actually interested to see if the EX series would let me do this,
> and i
> > t turns out that if
Jon,
Contact me off list with your business email and I'll look into it.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:24 PM Daryl G. Jurbala
wrote:
> The last time I worked with vMX was several years ago. The image was
> outdated to the point of having to fire up an older version of VMWare to
> export the two VM
Who's going to support that reflashed device? Certainly not the OEM vendor.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:30 AM Dave Taht wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:07 AM NetEquity Sales
> wrote:
> >
> > As someone who works within the "secondary market" for networking
> hardware, there is a ton of demand
> The oem ain't gonna support the resold device either.
Many vendors support resold gear through a recertification cost in order to
bring it back under a support contract.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:58 AM Dave Taht wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:33 AM Jason Biel wrote:
&g
Simon,
That is correct in most cases. Fabs are changing and the time needed to
manufacture is limited and most vendors are opt’ing to EoL/EoS gear early to
move to newer tech and cannot risk the time to manufacture older silicon and
spares that could be used for newer silicon.
On Fri, May 20,
22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your best
interest to not accept routes for it.
if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at the
email address specified in WHOIS.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:32 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04,
My recommendation:
https://github.com/netbox-community
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:04 PM Aaron Gould wrote:
> For years I've used an MS Excel spreadsheet to manage my IPv4
> addresses. IPv6 is going to be maddening to manage in a spreadsheet.
> What does everyone use for their IPv6 address pre
He went to Jared??
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
>
> > On June 4, 2014 12:15:47 PM PDT, Warren Kumari
> wrote:
> >> Yup, I did think it was worth asking the entire list.
>
>
> He has got to be cringing right about now... ;-)
>
> scott
>
--
Jason
Is it to the point where I can just forward the emails from help desk to
NANOG so I don't have to answer them?
Biel
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:39 PM, -Hammer- wrote:
> LOL
>
> -Hammer-
>
> "I was a normal American nerd"
> -Jack Herer
>
>
>
>
> On 08/10/2011 04:37 PM, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
>
>> h
TBH, this thread has made the hour preceding my Juniper upgrades *way* more
enjoyable.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Chaim Rieger wrote:
> replied inline, with a summary below
>
>
> On 8/10/2011 2:35 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> There is problem in our network. The connection is disappe
Deploy RANCID?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Jon Heise wrote:
> Does anyone know of a method of automating config backups for force10
> switches running SFTOS ? I've got an python expect script that works on our
> routers running FTOS, it uses a role account that can show the running
> config
Workaround is proper filtering and other techniques on the RE/Loopback to
prevent the issue from happening.
Should an upgrade be performed? Yes, but certainly doesn't have to have
right away or without notice to customers.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> My hunch is t
Agree as well.
Bad assumption on my part that Level3 would doing the items listed in the
workaround already.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Jason Biel wrote:
> > Workaround is proper filtering and other techniques on the RE
That is general guess.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:04:40PM +0200,
> JP Viljoen wrote
> a message of 10 lines which said:
>
> > the general guess I saw was that it was Juniper-related.
>
> Juniper Technical Bulletin PSN-2013-01-823, pr
Issues in FL as well.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Mikeal Clark wrote:
> I'm having issues as well on my iPhone 5. (Wi)
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Grant Ridder
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone having trouble with apples iMessage service? A friend and I
> are
> > in Wisconsin and
BGP Bible:
Internet Routing Architectures (2nd Edition)
http://amzn.com/157870233X
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> "Patterns in Network Architecture"
>
> You might not agree with it, but it does stimulate some thinking.
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> (Sent from my iPhone)
>
>
We have a few VDX-6720's deployed as strictly L2 switches...no issues to
really report.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Any particular reason a Brocade VDX-6720 wouldn't work as a standard layer
> 2 switch? The only reason I ask is that someone cautioned me on fiber
> cha
Or Arista
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Jerry Jones wrote:
> A different approach would be use one of the newer switches from Juniper
> and run right on the RE if you have those in your network
>
>
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 9:24 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Does anyone make a SFP with
Hey!
New message, please read <http://shop2.onnet.edu.vn/although.php?h1agw>
Jason Biel
How many plugs and what style do you need? What is the facility
providing receptacle wise? L15-30A three-phase ?
> On May 29, 2015, at 10:34 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
> Is there a way to stack PDUs? like, with 30A 220, we need more plugs
> than power but I'd like them to communicate to make s
You should look into SPLUNK (http://www.splunk.com/), it will collect/store
your syslog data and you can run customized reports and then act on them.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Kasper Adel wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am looking for a way to do proactive monitoring of my network, what I am
> spe
I think I'll look to one up him and register "theccar.com"
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:09, Gary Baribault wrote:
>
> Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
> whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
>
> Gary Baribault
> Courriel: g...@baribault.n
--
According to Snowden, there are government agents at key
positions for managing security.
-
And zero documented proof. I'll just go ahead and put my tinfoil hat on
for the remainder of this thread.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Randy Bush wr
PinPoint Communications, Inc.
> 100 N. 12th St Suite 500
> Lincoln, NE 68508
> 402-438-6211 ext 1923 Office
> 402-660-7982 Cell
> mark.urb...@pnpt.com
> [cid:image003.jpg@01CA5BD5.1A5CEE20]
>
>
>
--
Jason Biel
:
> True, we usually find Linux based machines work better running IPerf
> then Windows (at least out of the box) because of the TCP window
> sizewell Windows XP at least, don't know about Vista or 7.
>Jason Biel wrote:
>
> Please take note with using iperf that you&#
gt; neighboring block?
> >
> > I was thinking of having one /24 for each block size, and then do the
> divide
> > and conquer approach by allocating the first /30, for example, as 0 and
> 128,
> > then next two at 64 and 192, etc. Once there's only one /30 free between
> > each allocation, I would start using another /24. Of course, that would
> > mean 50% (or less) utilization.
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Jason Biel
ja...@biel-tech.com
result
> clicked that lead to a google page headed with "This site may harm your
> computer" and no further option to proceed.
>
> I even tried entering google.com in search and first result of the search
> was the google search engine with again "This site may harm your computer".
>
> any ideas.
>
>
>
--
Jason Biel
, but more likely,
> I'd bet that the ISP has never configured BGP on the client end of their
> network, and aren't too anxious to figure out how to do so.
>
> Steve
>
>
--
Jason Biel
gt; >>
> >> ha - hey charles...i subscribe to nanog and saw your email come across
> and
> >> had to send a note...too funny. Charles Ragan here...
> >>
> >> Charles
> >>
> >> Charles Regan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I want to advertise my /22 to two different ISP on different POP.
> >>
> >> I can't use BGP as ISP1 doesn't support it.
> >>
> >> Any suggestions ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Charles
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Jason Biel
To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
> >
> > I want to advertise my /22 to two different ISP on different POP.
> >
> > I can't use BGP as ISP1 doesn't support it.
> >
> > Any suggestions ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Charles
> >
> >
>
>
--
Jason Biel
Good point on ISP1 Steve, being they are limited already, they might be just
reselling.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Jason Biel wrote:
> > The link that goes down will trigger that provider to remove the route,
> > traffic will swing and start c
2 if I ask them.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jason Biel wrote:
> >> Good point on ISP1 Steve, being they are limited already, they might be
> just
> >> reselling.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:
scanning but I don't like that warning.
>
> What other library is Impacket looking for to correct that warning?
>
> --
> Thanks, Joe
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Paul Ferguson
> wrote:
>
>
>
--
Jason Biel
hic algorithms and protocols, implemented
> > for use from Python
> >
> > d
> >
>
>
--
Jason Biel
hey can troubleshoot that? call in a company to help identify it?
> >
> > -Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Jason Biel
Look at NetOptics Directors or the VSS 4x24. I've deployed several.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Darren Bolding wrote:
> We are planning on purchasing some network taps for a couple of locations
> in
> our network, and we expect to make significantly greater use of them in the
> next year o
37 matches
Mail list logo
