It will depend on the source of the traffic and how that peer follows AS path into your providers.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Charles Regan <charles.re...@gmail.com>wrote: > What if both annonce my /22 unweighted ? > > I know I will loose failover in this scenario. > > I am trying to figure out what will happen, traffic will flow inbound > from both in a round-robin like method ? > > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Charles Regan <charles.re...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The can't do BGP. > > They are already advertising two /24 for us. So they will advertise a > > /22 if I ask them. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jason Biel <ja...@biel-tech.com> wrote: > >> Good point on ISP1 Steve, being they are limited already, they might be > just > >> reselling. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Steve Bertrand <st...@ibctech.ca> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Jason Biel wrote: > >>> > The link that goes down will trigger that provider to remove the > route, > >>> > traffic will swing and start coming in on the backup link. > >>> > >>> This is assuming that 'ISP1' has the capability to advertise the OP's > >>> route in the first place. > >>> > >>> What if ISP1 is simply a customer of another ISP, using PA space, and > >>> just reselling connectivity? > >>> > >>> Charles, you really need to find out what others have asked... can the > >>> ISP1 advertise your block of space for you, or do they really mean that > >>> they *can't* do BGP at all. > >>> > >>> Steve > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jason Biel > >> > >> > > > > -- Jason Biel
