Hi Tom,
This is exactly what I was planning.
I'm announcing a block via ISP1 and another set of blocks via ISP2, and
have iBGP running between them.
Thanks a lot!!
Best regards,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 1:00 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Jean-
>
> Yeah, don't worry about people complaining.
>
>
Jean-
Yeah, don't worry about people complaining.
Is this an accurate description of what you are trying to achieve?
- Have 2 different sets of prefixes that you announce. Set A via
router1/ISP1 , Set B via router2/ISP2
- If BGP to one of your ISPs goes down, start announcing those prefixes to
t
These days, it's a LOT easier to get dedicated ethernet wave service
between A and Z than it used to be. The pseudowire options were developed
to fill that gap that customers wanted.
Still certainly use cases for it, but generally the dedicated waves are
much easier to get and probably cheaper. Th
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bg
*nods* for PtP, I agree. As a buyer (and a seller) waves, waves, waves. As a
seller, it's less stuff for me to manage. As a buyer, I don't have to trust you
on oversubscribing a wave because you can't. You can oversubscribe the hell out
of an Ethernet circuit, though.
Waves are much harder in
" But even the rich can't fix broadband access beyond their property line."
It depends on how rich. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Donelan"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fr
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024, Aaron Wendel wrote:
When I built my house a few years ago I put a 0 entry hand hole with 2"
conduit in the ROW in front and pulled 96 SM into the basement. It takes a
little convincing to get the providers to connect out there instead of
running their own lines into my hou
" The builder/owner is responsible for construction between the ROW/property
line and the building."
and to the ISP, that's the most expensive part of the equation. It should would
be nice to not be financially responsible for that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
M
I just wish I had the hook up at my local ISP (Armstrong). They are currently
running fiber to replace their Coax infrastructure, but they haven’t done it
down my street yet. I wish they would!
> On Dec 27, 2024, at 17:56, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> "The builder/owner is responsible for constru
On 12/27/24 18:28, Tom Beecher wrote:
These days, it's a LOT easier to get dedicated ethernet wave service
between A and Z than it used to be. The pseudowire options were
developed to fill that gap that customers wanted.
Still certainly use cases for it, but generally the dedicated waves
About 20% of new home construction is owner-financed ("Custom" homes). The
builder will add essentially any "commercially reasonable" options the
owner is willing to pay for. But even the rich can't fix broadband access
beyond their property line.
About 80% of new home construction is builder
When I built my house a few years ago I put a 0 entry hand hole with 2"
conduit in the ROW in front and pulled 96 SM into the basement. It
takes a little convincing to get the providers to connect out there
instead of running their own lines into my house but so far so good.
-- Original
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024, Mike Hammett wrote:
"But even the rich can't fix broadband access beyond their property line."
It depends on how rich. ;-)
The limitations of the FCC Broadband map, if you are in the Top 10 (not
percent, the Top 10) wealthest people in the USA, it doesn't apply to
reali
On 12/28/24 00:31, Mike Hammett wrote:
*nods* for PtP, I agree. As a buyer (and a seller) waves, waves,
waves. As a seller, it's less stuff for me to manage. As a buyer, I
don't have to trust you on oversubscribing a wave because you can't.
You can oversubscribe the hell out of an Ethernet
14 matches
Mail list logo
