Went through this last year. They simply didn't do anything productive.
You have to change IPs if you want a quick resolution. They should email
the POC for the IP (I think towards the end of the day) as to what happened
and I believe a time frame when it will get resolved.
Hopefully someone wit
Peace,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 9:27 PM Octolus Development wrote:
> We're facing some reflected DDoS attacks, where the source address is
> spoofed to appear to be our IPs, and as a result getting blacklisted.
> Sony's support has told us to "change IPs"
>
Wait, are they blacklisting spoofed IP(v4
And you're sure that you are the reflection target not the reflection
vector?
As in it's definitely the case that you are the *target* here (your IP
addresses are being spoofed, and the reflection attack is hitting you)
rather than that someone is abusing endpoints in your network, i.e.
reflecting
Good luck! I’ve dealt with such PSN IP blocking issues for several years and
have found that Sony is the absolute worst possible gaming/content provider
I’ve ever dealt with. One company I worked at had to threaten legal action as
PSN would block CGN IPv4 addresses on their network and then tell
To be fair they do contact you. It's an automated process that's done
daily and it has a light amount of information.
The rest is totally accurate - the Playstation network stuff is an absolute
joke (think back to how they were down for MONTHS).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-
Peace,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 9:10 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> And you're sure that you are the reflection target not the reflection
> vector?
>
Well, in almost any* case blacklisting reflection vectors by IP is an
insanely bad practice.
* — I can *think* of a use case when this could be an approp
No, that's only for "Account Takeover".. And those problems we've solved. That
was false reports, and we got whitelisted.
However with this issue? They decide to completely ignore the emails, it seems
like we're being either spoofed or people are attacking us with Sony's IP
space. What happens,
Peace,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:10 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> And you're sure that you are the reflection target not the reflection vector?
NB: I have just checked the IP addresses the OP has provided me with
(offlist) against our database of known reflection sources, and I
confirm that none of t
>
> Well, in almost any* case blacklisting reflection vectors by IP is an
> insanely bad practice.
> * — I can *think* of a use case when this could be an appropriate solution
> (I recall Netscout/Arbor once had such a use case), but in the overwhelming
> majority of incidents it is absolutely not,
We have some FS optics in Zhone equipment. Works better than the original
and has stronger output. However there is one catch: after a reboot zhone
recognise that the optics are not original and refuse to bring the ports
online. You then have to swap in an original optic to activate the port.
After
On 7/Jan/20 18:49, Andrey Kostin wrote:
>
>
> I'm had some aquintance with this technology and participated once in
> WiFi network rollout on a relatively big stadium. All these wifi
> controllers have their limits that in my understanding are
> significantly lower than mobile networks. You c
May be of interest, posted on the Startups of Puerto Rico Slack channel
earlier today:
Marcos Cruz [4:41 AM]
I hope everyone is well, Noob question: Does anyone know for how long do
the power plants of cell towers run on diesel?
Mike Rosado:house_with_garden: [8:03 AM]
I spoke with my parents in
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:51 John Curran wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
> wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of
> cases where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but which
> those customers originate f
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:46 PM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:51 John Curran wrote:
>
>> On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of
>> cases where Cogent has sub-allocat
The part that has me uneasy about that action is that the chance that Cogent
sales reps are using Cogent IPs is probably low. They're probably doing this
work at home. They wouldn't be blocked at all.
Also, the chance that there are people that wish to use ARIN Whois services
that are not C
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, 21:16 Mark Tinka, wrote:
>
>
> On 7/Jan/20 12:01, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
> > So while the IP space is registered to Cogent and allocated to its
> > customer, the AS-path might be something like ^174_456$ but it's
> > entirely possible that ARIN would observe it as ^1
Puerto Rico Internet exchange is 100% fully operational
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:44 PM Yosem Companys wrote:
> May be of interest, posted on the Startups of Puerto Rico Slack channel
> earlier today:
>
> Marcos Cruz [4:41 AM]
> I hope everyone is well, Noob question: Does anyone know for how lon
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 04:54:22PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> That said, if there's a stern warning about Cogent abusing the system,
> maybe their customers finding out is a good thing for the overall
> community. ;-)
And that is what I would suggest: reply to all queries with a notice
that expl
Hmm. Wonder if this can be used to cancel some cogent services... I mean, they
technically aren't providing access to the full internet now. 🤷♂️🤔
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note9, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone
Original message
From: Rich Kulawiec
Date: 1/7/20 7
I have to +1 this. I've been solicited many times by them myself and it's sad
to see the information used that way.
When I worked at another carrier I helped stop this as well with the sales
people. They were creative, but it does at least violate the social norms of
the industry at minimum an
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
98% of the comments were opposed.
How many / which companies would have to get onboard in order to get
enough support for an icann alternative?
Is such a thing even feasible?
-Dan
On NANOG list , Dan Hollis
wrote:
>https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
Operator of the dot-com registry, Verisign, has decided to pay DNS
overseer ICANN $4m a year for the next five years in order to “educate
the wider ICANN community about security threats.”
>98% of
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:58 PM Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> On NANOG list , Dan Hollis
> wrote:
>
> >https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
>
> Operator of the dot-com registry, Verisign, has decided to pay DNS
> overseer ICANN $4m a year for the next five years in order to “
ARIN can’t do much about that… Have you contacted RIPE and/or APNIC and asked
them to take appropriate action?
Owen
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 07:58 , David Guo via NANOG wrote:
>
> Good News! But we still received several spams from Cogent for our RIPE and
> APNIC ASNs.
>
> From: NANOG On Beha
I will also say that ARIN does not appear to take suspension like this lightly
at all… It has taken many years and I’m betting (at least) scores of complaints
about this chronic behavior by Cogent prior to ARIN taking this action.
I know that I personally have filed a number of fully documented
On 8/Jan/20 00:59, Matthew Walster wrote:
>
> Same origin, RPKI ROA would be valid.
True. But if one of multiple origins was ROA'd, others that aren't would
be marked as Invalid.
Mark.
Peace,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:36 AM Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Can you define exactly what services have been blocked?
> IRR/ROA/TLA registry updates, etc? Were they blocked
> ^174 or 174$? This is a precedent AFAIK. I’d like to
> understand consequences.
+1
--
Töma
Fairly big earthquake has hit Puerto Rico, 6.6 almost all power in areas I
have contacts are down
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/#%7B%22autoUpdate%22%3A%5B%22autoUpdate%22%5D%2C%22basemap%22%3A%22grayscale%22%2C%22feed%22%3A%221day_m25%22%2C%22listFormat%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22mappos
Peace,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:17 PM David Hubbard
wrote:
> When they spam me I typically just ask if they have
> IPv6 to Google and never hear back…
Same here. Each time they reach out to me I quickly send them to
investigate if they are able to lift the stupid 100th percentile
requirement Co
* David Guo via NANOG
> Good News! But we still received several spams from Cogent for our RIPE and
> APNIC ASNs.
If you are an EU/EEA citizen, you may object to their use of your personal
information for marketing purposes (or for any purpose at all), as well as
request erasure.
(Note: these
I have two separate entries for sets of phone numbers/email addresses,
associated with my name, that must be in Cogent's CRM system as cold leads.
About every six months I am contacted by a new person whom I've never heard
of before. My theory is that each newbie Cogent sales rep has been assigned
Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of cases
where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but which those
customers originate from their own ASN and then announce to multiple upstream
providers.
So while the IP space is registered to Cogent and alloc
On 7/Jan/20 12:01, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
> Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know
> of cases where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but
> which those customers originate from their own ASN and then announce
> to multiple upstream provide
On 1/7/20 11:16 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Well, they would certainly be blocked by RPKI unless ROA's for those
> originations are created.
>
> Mark.
I don't think Cogent signed ROAs for any of their legacy IP space from
which they make sub-allocations to customers.. so for networks doing ROV
it sho
On 7/Jan/20 13:12, Martijn Schmidt wrote:
> I don't think Cogent signed ROAs for any of their legacy IP space from
> which they make sub-allocations to customers.. so for networks doing ROV
> it should just evaluate to an unknown state, rather than an invalid state.
Indeed... it was just a re
I do that every time ;)
As the owner of telco, I even get small money for this call termination.
Also, we implemented immediate answer and voice menu option, it says
"Welcome, press ... to reach ...!" and circles. So me (as the telco
operator) receive the money for call termination, and real c
Not only international call costs money (yes, it is extremely cheap SIP
nowdays), but the time of call center operators costs money as well, And
it is really not so cheap for the end customer (i.e. spammer), even in
India.
20.12.19 19:56, Mark Milhollan пише:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Keith Medcal
On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of cases
> where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but which those
> customers originate from their own ASN and then announce to multiple upstrea
If your data center is in Ashburn, which is in Loudoun County, then the
servers inside are considered personal property and are taxed as such. They
explain it in the latter part of the article.
https://datacenterfrontier.com/the-data-center-dividend-tax-revenue-surges-in-loudoun-county/
Laura
It's in Reston (Fairfax County).
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:22 AM Eilers, Laura via NANOG
wrote:
> If your data center is in Ashburn, which is in Loudoun County, then the
> servers inside are considered personal property and are taxed as such. They
> explain it in the latter part of the article.
Paul Nash писал 2020-01-06 18:45:
Depending on what you are after, folk like Ruckus and Cisco have had
centrally-managed enterprise WiFi for many years. I manage a Ruckus
installation for an apartment building where there is one SSID from
about 150 APs, users have a unique password per apartmen
41 matches
Mail list logo
