Learned that attachments do make it to the list. Here's a link:
http://pastebin.com/tMdcfvji
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:29 AM, inetjunkmail
wrote:
> Attached is a perl script I wrote for a coworker that you can tweak as
> you'd like. It's designed to log into a router and dump the route table
So we all know that its much more difficult to diagnose using that tool
than just reading its output more often than not.
Whats usually more important is correlation, over time and at any
specific time.
While tools such as mtr provide over time viewpoints, what can be run,
user style, that w
Found a routing problem between TATA COMMUNICATIONS and Level 3
Communications, Inc.
Attempted traceroute from Digital Ocean to FrontRange Internet :
traceroute to www.asx.com (2607:fa88:1000:5::a744:a050) from
2604:a880:800:10::1ba:5001, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets
1 2604:a880:800:10::ff
The results appear to be missing 192.168.0.0/32.
Is this intended behavior?
192.168.0.8/27 is not a valid CIDR — It actually represents an address within
192.168.0.0/27, so actually, rather than missing 192.168.0.0/32, one could
argue that there are erroneous reports for 192.168.0.2/31, 192.168
Surprisingly enough demand for Internet services did not end when we ran out of
IPv4. I'd like to hear from the guys and gals starting new ISPs how they are
facing this brave new world.
Is it NATs all the way down?
Is IPv6 the knight in shining armor?
Are you getting enough IPs? If not, how a
Hello everyone,
Under a Cloud project I ask myself to use equipment based on the Pica8
or Cumulus Networks.
All in order to mount a Spine & Leaf architecture
- Spine 40Gbps
- Leaf in 10Gbps
Someone of you there a feedback on this equipment.
Regards,
Yoann THOMAS
CTO - Castle-IT
nanog-...@mail.com writes:
> Surprisingly enough demand for Internet services did not end when we
> ran out of IPv4. I'd like to hear from the guys and gals starting new
> ISPs how they are facing this brave new world.
I can help. We're a cable company operating in Atlantic City who hope
to hav
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 23:53, Yoann THOMAS wrote:
> Under a Cloud project I ask myself to use equipment based on the Pica8 or
> Cumulus Networks.
We’ve had some great conversations with Cumulus, but more generally, I think
you need to look at the cloud project’s goals. Those should help inform
On 02/11/15 17:14, Joe Klein wrote:
> Found a routing problem between TATA COMMUNICATIONS
LOUD NOISES
--
Tom
Yoann THOMAS writes:
> Under a Cloud project I ask myself to use equipment based on the Pica8
> or Cumulus Networks.
Ah, quite different beasts.
Cumulus Networks tries to really make the switch look like a Linux
system with hardware-accelerated forwarding, so you can use stock
programs that manip
On 2 November 2015 at 12:53, wrote:
> Surprisingly enough demand for Internet services did not end when we ran
> out of IPv4. I'd like to hear from the guys and gals starting new ISPs how
> they are facing this brave new world.
>
> Is it NATs all the way down?
>
No NAT.
>
> Is IPv6 the knight
The two I am working with are factoring buying IP space as part of the business
model. Folks like Cogent are now charging a $50 BGP fee so it is a new world.
I am seeing more and more folks go to MPLS to try and squeeze as many IPs out
as they can. They are flattening their customer pools and
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Yoann THOMAS wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Under a Cloud project I ask myself to use equipment based on the Pica8 or
> Cumulus Networks.
>
> All in order to mount a Spine & Leaf architecture
>
> - Spine 40Gbps
> - Leaf in 10Gbps
>
> Someone of you there a feedback
>-Original Message-
>
>Surprisingly enough demand for Internet services did not end when we ran out
>of IPv4. I'd like to hear from the guys and gals starting new ISPs how they
>are facing this brave new world.
>
Well, APNIC ran out years ago, so as someone with experience running a
re
If your vendors support it, doing stuff in-box is nice: ITU-T Y.1731.
If you're looking for an off box solution, PerfSONAR is actively
developed. You need some kind of ownership of all test points for
configuration and reporting for both solutions.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Joe Maimon wrot
Without disclosing too much, I learned from a person within BT's broader
organization that the removal of for www.bt.com was intentional for
troubleshooting purposes.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of frnk...@iname.com
Sent: Saturday,
16 matches
Mail list logo
