Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

Subject: Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27:46AM -0700 Quoting Merike Kaeo (mer...@doubleshotsecurity.com): > > B: they *did* know about the issue, but convincing management to spend > > the cash to buy hardware

Re: fire ants

Hi Suresh, Op 13 aug. 2014, om 03:16 heeft Suresh Ramasubramanian het volgende geschreven: > Needs an "Anthill Inside" sticker like Hex at the Unseen University. I should have bought one at the Discworld Convention last weekend :) http://www.pjsmprints.com/stickers/index.html Cheers, Sander

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

I believe at one point, SPRINT had in the RADB (and actively advertised) 0.0.0.0/2, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/2, and 192.0.0.0/2 under something called “Quarter Default Route, see Rational Default Project” or words to that effect. I could be wrong. It was a long time ago and I barely remember SPRIN

Re: [HFC] pooling modems in layer2

Hello   Thanks for the responses, I think it clarified a lot and I already started reading this CM-SP-L2VPN-I13-140403.pdf documentation. What I need here is that existing clients are sent through ISP1 currently and I would like to add ISP2 for future clients without interfering anything with t

Re: [HFC] pooling modems in layer2

Toney, Depending on which DHCP server software you're using, its probably easier to do this kind of move with it rather than trying to build layer 2 tunnels. Since each modem MAC is added (usually) to the DHCP server you can simply run two different server instances and with the original server i

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

On Aug 14, 2014, at 02:36 , Randy Bush wrote: >> It was kindly pointed out to me in private that my phrasing could be >> misleading here. >> >> When ACL112 came into being, there were old equipment that were being >> protected by the /19 filters. However, the filters were in place long >> after

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

> When ACL112 came into being, there were old equipment that were being > protected by the /19 filters. However, the filters were in place long > after those equipment were replaced. This was done for commercial reasons, not to protect the Internet. You know it, I know it, and I'm pretty sure the

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote: > Hence the “when programming the TCAM” part of my original statement :) Hi Chris, My point was that Randy's BGP RIB pruning knobs are missing for a different reason than your router FIB pruning knobs. Neither the science nor the technology

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics

- Original Message - > From: "Mark Tinka" > On Monday, August 04, 2014 04:38:39 PM Jay Ashworth wrote: > > So that implies he really did mean 44x GigE to end-prem, > > from 4 $5500 10G ports -- or, $500/home in MRC *cost* to > > the provider. > > > > I'm confused. > > With an edge router

Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf

Did cisco bother to open any DDTSes on the issues you saw? I’ve found that they care very little about these “automation” issues because they have zero automation in their lab testing that reflects how someone truly uses a device. I’ve been through many iterations with Cisco on this front with

intergenia ↔ mxlogic connection issues

Hello list, most /24 subnets from 85.25.0.0/16 network (PlusServer AG/intergenia AG) seem to be blocked on mxlogic.net inbound email servers (208.65.144.2 208.65.144.3 208.65.145.2 208.65.145.3). Could someone from both parties please check it? I tried to contact MX Logic by whois contacts (

RE: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

Nice little article http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/ -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 4:43 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject:

Re: Shaw routing issue 12 Aug 2014

Thanks for the info Pete, Geoffrey & Hugo! LU On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > Yep. Most of the time I've seen this it's two data centers, both go TCAM > exception. You reboot DC1, when it comes back up you reboot DC2. This means > no iBGP learned routes so DC1 is fine. DC

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

> My point was that Randy's BGP RIB pruning knobs are missing for a > different reason than your router FIB pruning knobs. Neither the > science nor the technology exists to create Randy's BGP pruning knobs. ahhh, you dug out the [j]tac tickets, or are you just conjecturbating? if the former, tick

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> My point was that Randy's BGP RIB pruning knobs are missing for a >> different reason than your router FIB pruning knobs. Neither the >> science nor the technology exists to create Randy's BGP pruning knobs. > > ahhh, you dug out the [j]tac tic

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

>> ahhh, you dug out the [j]tac tickets, or are you just conjecturbating? > Neither. ROFL. so just ad hominem. smart. randy

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> ahhh, you dug out the [j]tac tickets, or are you just conjecturbating? >> Neither. I'm reporting the state of the science. > > ROFL. so just ad hominem. smart. That phrase "ad hominem," I don't think it means what you think it means. -Bill

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE sm - Reply message - From: "William Herrin" To: "Randy Bush" Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" Subject: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2014 6:04 pm On Thu, Aug 14,

Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

I think you mean what is best described here: http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt --Aris > Suresh Ramasubramanian > Thursday, August 14, 2014 04:59 > Swisscom or some other European SP has / used to have a limit where they > would not accept

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics

On Thursday, August 14, 2014 05:24:56 PM Jay Ashworth wrote: > Given the context of the conversation, I was hoping it > was clear I meant a *wet* port, not just a jack on a > card... Indeed. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.