Subject: Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27:46AM -0700 Quoting Merike Kaeo (mer...@doubleshotsecurity.com): > > B: they *did* know about the issue, but convincing management to spend > > the cash to buy hardware that doesn't suck was hard, because > > "everything is working fine at the moment" -- some folk needed things > > to fail spectacularity to be able to justify shelling out the $$$ ( > > yes, they could recard the TCAM, but they are using this as an excuse > > to get some real gear)… > > Oh yeah, I'd bet this is also the case. Just like in 'security' related > issues….
This is why "test crash" was introduced.
http://markmail.org/message/tu46ecy272o3stvp
/Måns, just rebooted. (with a new carving already configured)
--
Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Thousands of days of civilians ... have produced a ... feeling for the
aesthetic modules --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
