On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for the update! It's good to hear that progress is being made.
>
> Is there a place where the challenges and solutions are being discussed
> publicly? It's interesting that you raise DNSSEC in comparison since the two
> techno
Barb,
You've apparently forgotten ICANN's time distortion field (which they'll be
inventing very shortly with the zillions of dollars they'll get from the new
gTLD program).
Err, yeah. 2006. Apologies -- typing on a cellphone can be distracting.
Regards,
-drc
On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Barb
Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact me
off-list? I have an employee in Virginia who works from home using, in part, a
VOIP desk telephone tied into our office phone system back in Nebraska. She's
had nothing but problems maintaining a stable connection
Have you monitored your user's home Comcast connection with regards to
packet loss or latency, preferably from network-near the SIP
termination point?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact
> me off-li
Make sure the remote phone is using a low bandwidth codec too. In a previous
life changing a remote (home) user's phone from G.711 to G.729 made all the
difference in the world to their call quality.
Matthew Shaw – Sr. Network Administrator
FairPoint Communications | ms...@fairpoint.com
www.Fa
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 07:35:32 -0700, David Conrad said:
> You've apparently forgotten ICANN's time distortion field
Apple will almost certainly sue for infringing their reality distortion field
patents.
pgpmQRDRlLPdd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
If you run something like a pingplotter or MTR from pbx side towards the
Remote,
and do similar from remote towards the pbx side...
Let it run for a bit, and compare / analyse the results.. you will spot your
problem very quickly.
---
We find that the IP Transit is often overloaded betwee
as it so happens, i could still use a decent contact over at AS3209. noc
channels are unresponsive. even tried this one listed in radb:
n...@adm.arcor.net.
they are doing something really funky with their cg-nat setup for mobile
subs. like, frag mapping gone wrong, therefore crazy retries or acks
On 8/6/2013 11:56 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact
> me off-list? I have an employee in Virginia who works from home using, in
> part, a VOIP desk telephone tied into our office phone system back in
> Nebraska. She's had n
Thanks for your detailed response John. Further comments inline.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:58 PM, John Curran wrote:
>
>
> So, Marcel, please allow me to turn the question around... Do you
> do you believe that there should be an RPKI Global Trust Anchor?
> Are you concerned about the pote
"Shaw, Matthew" writes:
> Make sure the remote phone is using a low bandwidth codec too. In a
> previous life changing a remote (home) user's phone from G.711 to
> G.729 made all the difference in the world to their call quality.
i think you've got that backwards. 80 kbit/sec on the wire is no
11 matches
Mail list logo
