Barb, You've apparently forgotten ICANN's time distortion field (which they'll be inventing very shortly with the zillions of dollars they'll get from the new gTLD program).
Err, yeah. 2006. Apologies -- typing on a cellphone can be distracting. Regards, -drc On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Barbara Roseman <barbara.rose...@icann.org> wrote: > I think David meant 2006, not 1996. > > -Barb Roseman > > On 8/5/13 12:08 PM, "David Conrad" <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > >> Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For >> political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let >> ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as the >> root TA as recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward. >> >> Regards, >> -drc >> ---- >> Mobile device, sorry about tpyos >> >> On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an >>> open >>> action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings: >>> http://www.nro.net >>> >>> It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address >>> support >>> organization, will move on this before NRO does. >>> >>> >>> Rubens >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Marcel Plug <marcelp...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Nanog, >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the >>>> effort >>>> to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on >>>> this? >>>> If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind? >>>> >>>> Most of the information i can find is about 2 years old. >>>> >>>> Any links or info of any kind would be much appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Marcel Plug >>>> >>
