On 4/9/2010 23:23, Franck Martin wrote:
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100409_oecd_reports_on_state_of_ipv6_deployment_for_policy_makers/
>
>
Nasty, degenerate, foot-dragging U.S. of A. does it again.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
> I would characterize the US as a first rate military and economic
> power, but a third rate place to live.
What are the net emigration rates by country?
What are the net "medical tourism" rates by country?
What are the net disaster charity rates by cou
Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
>
>> I would characterize the US as a first rate military and economic
>> power, but a third rate place to live.
>
> What are the net emigration rates by country?
>
> What are the net "medical tourism" rates by country?
>
> What ar
On 4/10/2010 09:19, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> Larry Sheldon wrote:
>> On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
> Please, let's keep this off the NANOG list! I am already on a
> politically oriented forum.
Got it. It is OK to make accusations, but not OK to challenge them.
My apologies.
--
S
On 4/10/10 1:42 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> You should have seen the CNN experiment on cyber attack...
>
> you mean the failed chertoff/cheney wanna make the news clueless crap?
> puhleeze! the fcc has more guns than that mob had clue.
unfortunately, the failed chertoff/cheney celebrants of the
"c
Yawn.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Larry Sheldon
wrote:
On 4/10/2010 09:19, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
Please, let's keep this off the NANOG list! I am already on a
politically oriented forum.
Got it.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
> it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a small part of it.
>
> http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/8/44961688.pdf
John,
I'd like to call your attention to slide 8
On Apr 10, 2010, at 9:40 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
>> it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a small part of it.
>>
>> http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/8/449
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, William Herrin wrote:
Fun movies notwithstanding, they generally issue a fine and work it
through the civil courts.
And please educate me then, when I don't pay the fine, then what happens?
--
Brandon Ross AIM: BrandonNRoss
On Apr 9, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I believe you are doing a disservice to the FCC by making these inflammatory
> statements.
And here I thought I was defending them for being different & better than the
last group.
The point is, joe asked about the FCC that made a ruling. The s
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2010, at 9:40 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> karine perset's work is, as usual, good enough that it should be seen in
>>> it's original, not some circle-je^h^hid hack of a sm
On 10/04/2010 21:36, Tim Durack wrote:
> Notify all holders of a currently active AS they have been
> allocated/assigned a /32. No fees. No questions.
>
> To accept the allocation/assignment, it must be advertised within a 24
> month period.
>
> There is no shortage of available /32s in 2000::/3.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> I'm puzzled as to why you might think that this would incentivise
> meaningful deployment of ipv6.
>
> Nick
>
>
It removes the hurdle of working with the RIR and/or getting
management buy-in to go negotiate for number resources.
(Our pers
The FCC is structured in such a way that the chairman calls all the
shots on policy matters. In this instance, the former chairman, Kevin
Martin, was responsible for the Comcast order but the current chairman,
Julius Genachowski, had to defend it in court. Some wags insist that the
defense was
Dave Israel wrote:
On 4/9/2010 12:30 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Put differently, you work in this arena too... you've presumably
talked to stakeholders. Can you list some of the reasons people have
provided for not adopting v6, and are any of them related to the v6
policies regarding address sp
Sorry if it is not the right forum, but I'm trying to get a grip on 32Bits ASN
on Cisco
I see that feature is available on 12.4(24)T
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6599/data_sheet_C78-521821.html
Which is available only for "new gear". I don't know how ne
You can still request a 16 bit ASN from the registries, so if this is
a concern for a new deployment you're not out of luck (yet). There is
a compatibility mechanism, so you can still receive routes sourced
from (or passing through) 32 bit ASNs, they will simply appear as AS
23456. Even if you have
17 matches
Mail list logo
