I think it began a while ago, but I suspect it'll increase. There's now
two trans-Russian terrestrial systems, and more investment in Asia -
Europe cables. Initially the capacity will be used for redundancy and
to shorten latencies (ie. just to go around the other way and because
it's quicke
At 03:07 PM 12-09-08 +0100, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 12 Sep 2008, at 13:49, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 12/09/2008, at 10:42 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
Hi, WatchMy.Net is a new community service to alert you when your
prefix
has been hijacked, in real-time.
I just had a quick play with this, as I've bee
The best system so far would be IAR: http://iar.cs.unm.edu/
The email notices are pretty much on time and accurate. Problem is they
have changed the system and I believe some forum page/link has gone lost
that allows one to manage existing subscriptions as per:
http://iar.cs.unm.edu/alerts.php#e
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I have used IAR, PHAS and MyASN and I can say I would not recommend myASN.
It is a cumbersome system and very non-intuitive. It is based on an
ASN-centric model, whereby each ASN is in its own realm. So if you manage
*one* ASN, perhaps this system m
On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Going back a bit in case you forgot, we were discussing the fact
you have NO RIGHT to connect to my network, it is a privilege, not
a right. You responded with: "If I have either a peering
agr
I am a network engineer for a large web hosting company. We are having
an issue with our distribution routers flooding traffic in one of our VLANs.
We have a customer with a routed mode ASA 5550. They have their own
private VLAN that is a /23 This VLAN is 145. The outside interface of
the firewall
Other cable systems predated FLAG (at least for voice).
SEA-ME-WE predates FLAG by almost a decade. I'm sure some digging
would reveal a bit more on that path either submarine or terrestrial.
MMC
On 15/09/2008, at 11:06 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 14 Sep 2008, at 19:41, Jean-François Mezei
On 14 Sep 2008, at 19:41, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
Did western europe ever really have a primary route via the USA to
reach
asia ?
Yes, I think so. If I remember correctly, before FLAG started laying
cables, there was no terrestrial route to Asia from Europe that didn't
involve North
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/business/30pipes.html?partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
Pardon my ignorance here, but isn't this more of a case of traffic
growing outside of the USA which means that traffic within the USA
represents a smaller share of the total
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
I don't think any of this will be because of sinister reasons, just
for good engineering reasons and probably just to guarantee, without a
doubt, that your circuit does NOT go through One Wilshire!
Just to ensure no confusion - this was just about redundancy and
d
I don't think any of this will be because of sinister reasons, just
for good engineering reasons and probably just to guarantee,
without a doubt, that your circuit does NOT go through One Wilshire!
What exactly would be sinister about moving traffic through routes
that didn't intersect the
On 15/09/2008, at 10:46 AM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Most Asian providers (at least Northern Asia) use USA, Atlantic
path to
get to Europe. The capacity going Westt isn't that high in
comparision,
so the extra latency hit is well offset by the much reduced co
Nothing if the reason isn't to avoid the US to prevent interception. ie.
my point was the people are doing this for engineering reasons not
political ones as was implied by that article.
I don't see it sinister even if someone wants to avoid US due to
interception. But, yes I agree people are do
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> Most Asian providers (at least Northern Asia) use USA, Atlantic path to
> get to Europe. The capacity going Westt isn't that high in comparision,
> so the extra latency hit is well offset by the much reduced cost.
I take it voice would have priority for use of the
Pardon my ignorance here, but isn't this more of a case of traffic
growing outside of the USA which means that traffic within the USA
represents a smaller share of the total internet traffic ?
I suspect so - especially with CDN/Content providers pushing traffic out
to the edge it means that
Steven:
This was recently discussed on cisco-nsp:
http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nsp&m=121316151010190&w=2
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Steven King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 7:27 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: ARP Table Timeout and Mac-Address-Table Timeou
Jamie A Lawrence wrote:
What exactly would be sinister about moving traffic through routes
that didn't intersect the U.S. border?
Nothing if the reason isn't to avoid the US to prevent interception.
ie. my point was the people are doing this for engineering reasons not
political ones as
> For instance, out of Australia we have a single, old cable going West out of
> Perth to Singapore (SEA-ME-WE3) which allows only low speed circuits, but
> we've got almost 4 (as of next year) cables going North and East out of
> Sydney. So most Europe traffic to/from Australia is via the USA.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Jim Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>UAE/Dubai is a major landing point for many asian/indian ocean fibers, but
>there is no equivilent of One Wilshire/60 Hudson/etc.
>
>so, as the data finds more and better direct routes to the end user,
>redu
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:11:28AM +0530, Murtaza wrote:
> Nothing if the reason isn't to avoid the US to prevent interception. ie.
> my point was the people are doing this for engineering reasons not
> political ones as was implied by that article.
>
> I don't see it sinister even if someone wa
But, it still is impossible in many asses, as ISPs in many countries are
still not cooperating with each other.
But, it still is impossible in many cases,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Murtaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Nothing if the reason isn't to avoid the US to prevent interception. ie
21 matches
Mail list logo
