>> Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what would
>> be denied here?
>
> sorry
seems mailing list filters; so it was not my fault.
try https://archive.psg.com/skype.jpg
randy
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:06:17 -0800,
Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what would
> be denied here?
sorry
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an update to skype will pop up and ask you
>
>
> deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
> world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
Was there meant to be a screenshot or some e
> Why not use jitsi meet?
i am familiar with jitsi. it's fine. but i am trying to get research
done, not teach/preach conferencing to a bunch of researchers.
this was just a warning about an attack through a skype update; not
meant as a discussion of conferencing technologies or an opp
On 14/2/19 9:03 am, Randy Bush wrote:
yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate
it.
Why not use jitsi meet?
Free, Open Source, Standards compliant, WebRTC, an instance is hosted by
IETF as well...
It's actually perfect for researchers.
https://jitsi.tools.ietf.
> Perhaps (issue created on 6 Dec 2017) relevant:
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_accountms-skype_privacyms/skype-suggests-people-from-my-contact-list-to/d8cc03ad-fa15-4de7-8d96-51510615cff4
perms for contact list is one thing. perms for icloud account i
Perhaps (issue created on 6 Dec 2017) relevant:
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_accountms-skype_privacyms/skype-suggests-people-from-my-contact-list-to/d8cc03ad-fa15-4de7-8d96-51510615cff4
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an update to skype
>> yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate
>> it.
> welp, at least the nsa can keep trac in real-time.
the nsa is not in the researchers' threat model. this is not that kind
of math.
randy
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:20 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > Y U USE SKYPE?
>
> yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate it.
>
>
welp, at least the nsa can keep trac in real-time.
they have that going for them.
> Y U USE SKYPE?
yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate it.
randy
Y U USE SKYPE?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:11 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> an update to skype will pop up and ask you
>
>
> deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
> world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
>
> randy
an update to skype will pop up and ask you
deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
randy
Hi guys,
last few days we have a several of our customers complaining about weird
problem with skype video chat.
When they try to initiate video call from their computer, call fails and
receiving side gets notification that they were called. But when
receiving side tries to call them, call
Hi Reuben,
I've responded offline.
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly via
NANOG
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:15 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Microsoft Skype for Business Contact - Broken PMTUD
Hi,
Hi,
Can someone from Microsoft who manages the network for the Skype for
Business please contact me to help resolve what I believe is a problem
with the S4B network?
I am experiencing PMTUD issues whereby connections with an IPv4 TCP MSS
above 1492 and an IPv6 TCP MSS of above 1432 do not
Marco Paesani wrote:
> >
> > > No solution
> > > http://heartbeat.skype.com/2015/09/skype_presence_issues.html
> >
> > Back for me (France): presence updated. Using Skype on Linux
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--
-
ml
>
> Back for me (France): presence updated. Using Skype on Linux
>
> Paul
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Gavin Henry wrote:
>>> The same from Spain
>
> Desktop client on Linux in UK too.
sometimes it takes longer than expected to install all the necessary
software and hardware taps by the nsa folks.
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:21:40 +0200
Marco Paesani wrote:
> No solution
> http://heartbeat.skype.com/2015/09/skype_presence_issues.html
Back for me (France): presence updated. Using Skype on Linux
Paul
pgpB6P6t2698f.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>> The same from Spain
Desktop client on Linux in UK too.
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
http://www.surevoip.co.uk
OpenPGP (GPG/PGP) Public Key: 0x8CFBA8E6 - Import from hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
or http://www.suretecgroup.com/0x8CFBA8E6.gpg
>> The same from Spain
Desktop client on Linux in UK too.
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
http://www.surevoip.co.uk
OpenPGP (GPG/PGP) Public Key: 0x8CFBA8E6 - Import from hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
or http://www.suretecgroup.com/0x8CFBA8E6.gpg
gt; Regards, K.
>
> Issues with Skype status and calling
> By My status Leonas Sendrauskas on September 21, 2015.
> Updated 11:00 UTC
>
> We have detected an issue that is affecting Skype in a number of ways.
>
> If you're signed in to Skype, you will not be able to
http://heartbeat.skype.com says they've been intermittent since approx.
10:00UTC.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Marco Paesani
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:33 AM
To: nanog
Subject: Skype off line ??
Hi,
do you have sone news abo
On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 10:32 +0200, Marco Paesani wrote:
> do you have some news about it ?
There's a service status article on www.skype.com:
Regards, K.
Issues with Skype status and calling
By My status Leonas Sendrauskas on September 21, 2015.
Updated 11:00 UTC
We have detected
t; integer. Setting the value to 0 disables the history feature and, as a
> result, nothing is kept in memory. The default value is 20. This value
> is global and thus affects all rooms on the service."
>
> Thats not quite the same though as you get with Skype where i think the
&g
as a
result, nothing is kept in memory. The default value is 20. This value
is global and thus affects all rooms on the service."
Thats not quite the same though as you get with Skype where i think the
history gets synced in a bi-directional fashion.
kind regards,
Stefan
On 21.09.15 13
oun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:27 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Skype off line ??
>
> For me yes, it is down for several hours.
>
> BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usability?
>
> I need just scro
You ca use Google Hangouts, but I don't know about multiuser conference.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:27 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Skype off line ??
For me yes, it is dow
> On 21.09.2015, at 12:35, Alejandro Acosta
> wrote:
>
> The same from Spain
Desktop client login not possible (Germany)
Web client works fine
Wolfgang
The same from Spain
El 9/21/2015 a las 6:00 AM, Pui Edylie escribió:
> Reporting the same from Singapore
>
> Sent from TypeMail
>
>
>
> On Sep 21, 2015, 18:27, at 18:27, Max Tulyev wrote:
>> For me yes, it is down for several hours.
>>
>> BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usabilit
Reporting the same from Singapore
Sent from TypeMail
On Sep 21, 2015, 18:27, at 18:27, Max Tulyev wrote:
>For me yes, it is down for several hours.
>
>BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usability?
>
>I need just scroll up to view all history and one click to join someone
>to mul
For me yes, it is down for several hours.
BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usability?
I need just scroll up to view all history and one click to join someone
to multiuser conference in fact.
On 21.09.15 11:32, Marco Paesani wrote:
> Hi,
> do you have sone news about it ?
> Best
On 9/21/2015 03:37, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 9/21/2015 03:32, Marco Paesani wrote:
Hi,
do you have some news about it ?
Best regards,
I get a log-in screen.
Do you have a fact to go with your question?
Turns out the log-in screen is the last last sign or life--submitting
username and passwo
Yes, its offline.
http://heartbeat.skype.com/
Skype presence issues
<http://heartbeat.skype.com/2015/09/skype_presence_issues.html>
By Leonas Sendrauskas on September 21, 2015.
Some of you may experience problems with Skype presence and may not see
online status. We apologize f
On 9/21/2015 03:32, Marco Paesani wrote:
Hi,
do you have some news about it ?
Best regards,
I get a log-in screen.
Do you ha a fact to go with your question?
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
Hi,
do you have sone news about it ?
Best regards,
--
Marco Paesani
MPAE Srl
Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: ma...@paesani.it
Skype previously showed a warning message showing that the Skype API /
Third party applications would stop working as of December 2013.
I would bet there was a silent forceful update to the software...
--
-JH
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> I just caught an alert
I just caught an alert on my desktop about high disk activity by Skype,
looking at the details it shows a 472MB of disk write activity, no
notification of upgrade or any other messages.
Trying to see if I can find what was recently written.
This the first time I see a report about such high disk
report bugs. they're great about fixes
randy
On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:24 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch of us are using
>>> jitsi for video, https://jitsi.org/
>> And last I tried it, it kept segfaulting on something dumb ;)
>
> try the nightlies
>
I'm trying the latest two nightlies -- two annoy
> This looks very useful. Would love to see mobile devices (e.g.
> Tablets) supporting it.
> I dislike having to put my stuff on servers just for sharing among my
> devices.
or for sharing between friends/co-workers. i just don't like putting my
stuff on other people's servers, period.
randy
vers just for sharing among my devices.
Cheers,
Rajiv
Sent from my Phone
On Apr 26, 2013, at 2:15 AM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> skype seems to have made the latest 6.x incompatible with 2.8 (which
> folk who care about screen real estate run) in that video no longer
> wo
>> until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch of us are using
>> jitsi for video, https://jitsi.org/
> And last I tried it, it kept segfaulting on something dumb ;)
try the nightlies
>> and while you are looking at escaping other big company servers,
>> check out http://labs.bittorrent.com
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 03:12:46PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> skype seems to have made the latest 6.x incompatible with 2.8 (which
> folk who care about screen real estate run) in that video no longer
> works between them.
>
> until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch
skype seems to have made the latest 6.x incompatible with 2.8 (which
folk who care about screen real estate run) in that video no longer
works between them.
until widespread availability of webrtc, a bunch of us are using
jitsi for video, https://jitsi.org/
o uses open standard protocols
o
Mike Gatti wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to get the groups opinions/thought on how you would or currently
handle users wanting or using Skype in the enterprise.
Recently what has brought this to light was the fact that our firewalls started
to deny/shun users randomly from access to the
Hello Everyone,
I wanted to get the groups opinions/thought on how you would or currently
handle users wanting or using Skype in the enterprise.
Recently what has brought this to light was the fact that our firewalls started
to deny/shun users randomly from access to the internet.
After a
Howdy,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> > On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as
> >> launching t
On 10/14/11 12:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Those do not look like Skype servers. I guess it is possible everyone in my
contact list is somehow pinging me, but that seems a little bit silly.
How do you think peer-to-peer presence
(online/away/do-not-disturb/offline) systems work
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>> On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>> In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as launching
>>> the app on a laptop
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as launching
>> the app on a laptop makes you a middle node for some conversations.
>
> Per the Skype IT a
> Indeed, but "reverse engineered" and "Egyptian government snooping Skype
> calls" are quite different. Whilst some people may have rather foolishly
> relied on Skype for privacy, this is now not going to happen. I doubt it'll
> make a big dent on the us
ack in mid December.
Indeed, but "reverse engineered" and "Egyptian government snooping Skype calls"
are quite different. Whilst some people may have rather foolishly relied on
Skype for privacy, this is now not going to happen. I doubt it'll
; > http://heartbeat.skype.com/
> > >
> > > skype has been microsofted already. "small number of users" my ass.
> > > probably 7/8 of the users i would see at this time are not on.
> >
> > On this topic, it has also been penetrated
I love how this story was published AFTER MSFT purchased them ;-)
--
Leigh Porter
> -Original Message-
> From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:t...@americafree.tv]
> Sent: 07 June 2011 15:28
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: NANOG Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: skype
>
>
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> http://heartbeat.skype.com/
>
> skype has been microsofted already. "small number of users" my ass.
> probably 7/8 of the users i would see at this time are not on.
On this topic, it has also been penetrated, by the
Is not working for me since early today, first the connection went
down and later the application crashed ... I refuse to switch to MSN.
I'm afraid that soon my monitor will explode if microsoft acquisition
of NVIDIA goes through.
BTW, after yesterday announcements at WWDC I wonder if there are s
+1,
My number is not working at all even the call not switching to voice mail.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> http://heartbeat.skype.com/
>
> skype has been microsofted already. "small number of users" my ass.
> proba
http://heartbeat.skype.com/
skype has been microsofted already. "small number of users" my ass.
probably 7/8 of the users i would see at this time are not on.
randy
;
> -Jack
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
>
>> Skype downtime today
>>
>> Earlier today, we noticed that the number of people online on Skype
>> was falling, which wasn’t typical or expected, so we began to
>> investigate.
>>
>&
"Creating new mega-supernodes as fast as they can!"
Definitely using that in a meeting tomorrow.
Cheers,
-Jack
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> Skype downtime today
>
> Earlier today, we noticed that the number of people online on Skype
> was
Skype downtime today
Earlier today, we noticed that the number of people online on Skype
was falling, which wasn’t typical or expected, so we began to
investigate.
Skype isn’t a network like a conventional phone or IM network –
instead, it relies on millions of individual connections between
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
>
>
>> Details are on their blog: http://bit.ly/edtjxB
%wget http://blogs.skype.com/ -O/dev/null
--2010-12-22 20:45:36-- http://blogs.skype.com/
Resolving blogs.skype.com... 204.9.163.155
Connecting to blogs.skype.com|204.9.163.155|:80... fai
On 12/22/2010 10:24 AM, Tim Connolly wrote:
Any word as to the root cause of the skype outage(s)?
Tim Connolly
Director of IT
Details are on their blog: http://bit.ly/edtjxB
Essentially the supernodes clients connected to started dying, so
they're setting up temporary mega-super
Any word as to the root cause of the skype outage(s)?
Tim Connolly
Director of IT
FareCompare
18111 Preston Rd
Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75252
Email: tim.does.not.want.spam.conno...@farecompare.com
Phone: +1 (972) 588-xxx
Cell: +1 (214) 882-
Web: www.farecompare.com
Find deals from your
65 matches
Mail list logo
