Re: Facebook down?

I can see in the browser debug spew that it's getting 503's on fbcdn.net. Mike On 8/11/22 2:36 PM, Joe Loiacono wrote: Well, makes sense. According to Schrodinger it's both up and down. On 8/11/2022 5:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 8/11/22 2:12 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: According to Heisenber

Re: Facebook down?

Well, makes sense. According to Schrodinger it's both up and down. On 8/11/2022 5:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 8/11/22 2:12 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: According to Heisenberg, it’s up :) It's still having problems serving up images. Thankfully their ad images are not affected :/ Mike -m

Re: Facebook down?

On 8/11/22 2:12 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: According to Heisenberg, it’s up :) It's still having problems serving up images. Thankfully their ad images are not affected :/ Mike -mel via cell On Aug 11, 2022, at 1:44 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: And of course the act of sending this mail c

Re: Facebook down?

According to Heisenberg, it’s up :) -mel via cell > On Aug 11, 2022, at 1:44 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > > And of course the act of sending this mail caused the wave function to > collapse and it seems to be up again, at least for me. > > Mike > >> On 8/11/22 1:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

Re: Facebook down?

And of course the act of sending this mail caused the wave function to collapse and it seems to be up again, at least for me. Mike On 8/11/22 1:37 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: They haven't been serving up images for like an hour or so and now it's showing their fail whale. Not sure if it's a (int

Facebook down?

They haven't been serving up images for like an hour or so and now it's showing their fail whale. Not sure if it's a (internal) network problem or not. I'm in California fwiw. Mike

Facebook down (was: Re: Facebook invisible in Italy)

Hello, Was down in Portugal until just now, and from downforeveryoneorjustme.com. Just tried and it seems to be working again, though. On 09/28/2015 09:39 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > Hai Marco, > > Same in NL so most likely bigger then Italy alone. > > Thanks, > Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Proloc

RE: Facebook down?

1:45 To: Di Li<mailto:d...@egihosting.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Facebook down? It wasn't loading here in the UK either, although it's back now. Edward Dore Freethought Internet On 3 Sep 2014, at 20:52, Di Li wrote: > SJC too > >

Re: Facebook down?

ne for me the whole time. I > do have an IPv6 tunnel to HE though, so maybe it was fine on v6 and only down > via v4?? > > > > From: Edward Dore > Sent: ‎03/‎09/‎2014 21:45 > To: Di Li > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Facebook down? > > It wasn'

Re: Facebook down?

ednesday, September 3, 2014 12:46 PM > To: Marshall Eubanks > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Facebook down? > > Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. > > Sent from my iPhone 5S. > >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks >> wrote: >> >> This message has no content.

Re: Facebook down?

it totally was not down from interstellar orbit. You didn't have time to tell because rtt from interstellar space is 11 hours minimum, which is even worse than some cellular data operators. Pants on fire. Can anyone confirm if it was down in the MD/DC, Northern Oregon, Eastern PA and Palo Alto a

Re: Facebook down?

- Original Message - > From: "Darius Jahandarie" > Down from intersellar orbit. And Darius wins the Internet for today. PS: What do you pay for a loop up there? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer

Re: Facebook down?

I called 911, they didn't know anything about it. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks < marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com > > It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks down > from here. > > Relevant

Re: Facebook down?

[image: Inline image 1] On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kristopher Doyen wrote: > Up here on Comcast in Tennessee. > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Di Li wrote: > > > SJC too > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, aUser wrote: > > > > > Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mo

Re: Facebook down?

It's up in NYC from Cogent traceroute to facebook.com (173.252.110.27), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 pfsense.alloy.local (172.16.20.1) 0.308 ms 0.395 ms 0.259 ms 2 10.0.2.2 (10.0.2.2) 0.719 ms 0.602 ms 0.480 ms 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * 6 gi0-0-0-18.209.nr11.b001578-0.jfk01.atlas

Re: Facebook down?

Looks to be back up now On 3/09/14 3:48 pm, "Randy Epstein" wrote: >Yes. > >On 9/3/14, 3:45 PM, "Marshall Eubanks" wrote: > >>http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com >> >>It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks >>down >>from here. >> >>Relevant bec

Re: Facebook down?

Works here (large .edu in Western PA). I would expect there to be rioting in the streets if FB was down. jms On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Charles Mills wrote: W. PA. too. Looks pretty widespread. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, aUser wrote: Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too.

Re: Facebook down?

Down from intersellar orbit. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Robert Webb wrote: > Down out of the VA/DC area also. > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:46:27 -0700 > aUser wrote: >> >> Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. >> >> Sent from my iPhone 5S. >> >>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM

Re: Facebook down?

It wasn't loading here in the UK either, although it's back now. Edward Dore Freethought Internet On 3 Sep 2014, at 20:52, Di Li wrote: > SJC too > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, aUser wrote: > >> Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. >> >> Sent from my iPhone 5S.

Re: Facebook down?

gt; Down here at Ford, Dearborn Michigan > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Marshall > Eubanks > > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:45 PM > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Facebook do

Re: Facebook down?

Up here on Comcast in Tennessee. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Di Li wrote: > SJC too > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, aUser wrote: > > > Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. > > > > Sent from my iPhone 5S. > > > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks < > >

Re: Facebook down?

Back up now (from Toronto) with the following IPs (69.171.237.20,2a03:2880:10:cf07:face:b00c:0:1) Was down when I first checked. % telnet www.facebook.com 443 Trying 69.171.237.20... telnet: connect to address 69.171.237.20: Connection refused Trying 2a03:2880:10:cf07:face:b00c:0:1... telnet: c

Re: Facebook down?

; To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Facebook down? > > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com > > It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* <http://facebook.com/> looks down > from here. > > Relevant because of the likely increase in productiviity > >

Re: Facebook down?

Thanks for posting. Same here too in NJ. I notified our helpdesk to prepare for the 3,000 students who will call in telling us is the "Internet is broken" On 9/3/2014 3:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com It's not just you! *http://facebook.co

Re: Facebook down?

Was down here too. But I see the homepage now. However, http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com still shows down. So maybe it is just starting to come up for some? What I would love to know what happened. :) Sincerely, Mark On 9/3/2014 12:48 PM, Warren Bailey wrote: I¹m getting

Re: Facebook down?

>From East coast of Canada down as well. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Warren Bailey < wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > I¹m getting a ton done right now too.. Hasn¹t been working since my first > attempt about 20 minutes ago. > > > > On 9/3/14, 12:45 PM, "Marshall Eubanks" > w

Re: Facebook down?

W. PA. too. Looks pretty widespread. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, aUser wrote: > Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. > > Sent from my iPhone 5S. > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks < > marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This message has no content.

Re: Facebook down?

Back up now. On 9/3/14, 3:48 PM, "Randy Epstein" wrote: >Yes. > >On 9/3/14, 3:45 PM, "Marshall Eubanks" wrote: > >>http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com >> >>It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks >>down >>from here. >> >>Relevant because of the like

Re: Facebook down?

Down out of the VA/DC area also. On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:46:27 -0700 aUser wrote: Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. Sent from my iPhone 5S. On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: This message has no content.

Re: Facebook down?

SJC too On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, aUser wrote: > Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. > > Sent from my iPhone 5S. > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks < > marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This message has no content. > -- Thanks, Di

RE: Facebook down?

Down here at Ford, Dearborn Michigan -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Eubanks Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:45 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Facebook down? http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com It's not

RE: Facebook down?

PM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down? Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. Sent from my iPhone 5S. > On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks > wrote: > > This message has no content.

Re: Facebook down?

I¹m getting a ton done right now too.. Hasn¹t been working since my first attempt about 20 minutes ago. On 9/3/14, 12:45 PM, "Marshall Eubanks" wrote: >http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com > >It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks down >from here.

Re: Facebook down?

Yes. On 9/3/14, 3:45 PM, "Marshall Eubanks" wrote: >http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com > >It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks down >from here. > >Relevant because of the likely increase in productiviity > > >Regards > >Marshall Eubanks

Re: Facebook down?

Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. Sent from my iPhone 5S. > On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks > wrote: > > This message has no content.

Facebook down?

http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* looks down from here. Relevant because of the likely increase in productiviity Regards Marshall Eubanks

Re: facebook down

I noticed Google Public DNS was returning ServerFail for www.facebook.com A earlier around 6pm EST ; , NS records were fine. Now DNS problem is solved but web still does not work. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Joly MacFie wrote: > I know there's an outages list, but seriously! > > It seem

RE: facebook down

and grapes. >From my Galaxy Note II, please excuse any mistakes. Original message From: Joly MacFie Date: 12/10/2012 3:09 PM (GMT-08:00) To: North American Network Operators Group Subject: facebook down I know there's an outages list, but seriously! It seems li

facebook down

I know there's an outages list, but seriously! It seems like a DNS prob? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://iso

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

- Original Message - > From: "Bret Clark" > I've always looked at the nanog list representing issues up to layer 4 > of the OSI model; mostly layer 3/4. Maybe a new mailing list could be > made called the North American Network Applications Group > (nanag)...there might be a pun there :).

RE: Facebook down!! Alert!

Message- From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:24 PM To: david raistrick Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On 06/10/10 17:05 -0400, david raistrick wrote: >my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content >provide

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On 10/06/2010 06:08 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote: This thread proves too me yet again that nanog is the internets equivalent of a giant panty raid. This isn't the outages list& I am rather annoyed that we must discuss junk social media sites such as facebook. Just because you are panicing does

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Giant Panty Raid. Now I know what I'll be calling my weekend/overnight shifts. Who says being a Network Engineer can't be fun? Q On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote: > > > This thread proves too me yet again that nanog is the internets equivalent > of a giant panty raid. Thi

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

- Original Message - > From: "david raistrick" > To: "Andrew Kirch" > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:05:10 PM > Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, david raistrick wrote: > > > On Wed, 6

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On 06/10/10 17:05 -0400, david raistrick wrote: my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure content provider, and (much like, say, google) provide both content AND service. I have dependancies on facebook's (as do many many others who perhaps dont yet hire folks who even know what

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:39:03 EDT, Andrew Kirch said: > No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is > not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power > loss at a peering point, DoS attack. Yes, but anytime something spikes the number of calls at m

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On 10/6/2010 5:05 PM, david raistrick wrote: > > > to be clear, I could give a damn about if we talk about this on nanog > or not. (and I agree that outages is the right place to announce > outages, and outage-discuss to discuss them). > > > my point is that facebook has moved beyond being a pure

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, david raistrick wrote: On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote: No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power not a mission critical internet resource -to you- to be clear, I

RE: Facebook down!! Alert!

> -Original Message- > From: Guerra, Ruben [mailto:ruben.gue...@arrisi.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:47 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: Facebook down!! Alert! > > Passes Andrew the shotgun... Please kill all FB threads with it. :) > > The

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote: No, the majority does not define what "operational" means. Facebook is not a mission critical internet resource (such as a fiber cut, power not a mission critical internet resource -to you- -- david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/lear

RE: Facebook down!! Alert!

:39 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On 10/6/2010 4:33 PM, david raistrick wrote: > > so the majority defines operational now, huh? wow. nice to know that > network service providers outnumber other companies these days... (of > course, those service provide

RE: Facebook down!! Alert!

: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Facebook down!! Alert! On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Matt Baldwin wrote: > I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a > tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g. Perhaps, then, we should instead be discussing the bu

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On 10/6/2010 4:33 PM, david raistrick wrote: > > so the majority defines operational now, huh? wow. nice to know that > network service providers outnumber other companies these days... (of > course, those service providers also make their money from facebook > consumers) No, the majority do

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Matt Baldwin wrote: I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g. Perhaps, then, we should instead be discussing the business benefits of blocking facebook so companies can regai

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Greg Whynott wrote: just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight outage. IMO which may be way off base, when akamai goes off the air, people lose potential sales/revenu

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

> From: "Mark" > It's back up. There goes that short burst of productivity. > > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Mark Hofman wrote: > > > Ditto In AU and from other reports US. > > Guess productivity will go up ;-) The irony is that the short burst of productivity was spent troubleshooting if F

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

> just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn't make a facebook > outage any less operationally relevant than, say, an akamai or limelight > outage. IMO which may be way off base, when akamai goes off the air, people lose potential sales/revenue. when facebook goes off the

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

I would imagine more businesses benefit from a FB outage in terms of a tick up in productivity versus businesses harmed by a FB outage, e.g. Zygna. So, net net a FB outage could be seen as a positive thing in the course of a work day. -matt On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM, david raistrick wrote

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Bret Clark wrote: I have to agree on this as well. I can understand when a service provider is you've forgotten that facebook (and indeed twitter too) are service providers that provide business-critical services. just because you don't want to play facebook games doesn

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Especially for Facebook alerts.. You are propagating a false perception that everyone cares. -g On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:20 PM, christian koch wrote: > +1 > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali wrote: > >> I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this. >> >>

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

I have to agree on this as well. I can understand when a service provider is having problems and people questioning it since that can affect many of us who depend on backbone connections, but sites like facebook and twitter being down should not be posted here but on the "sitesemployeeswastetim

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali wrote: > I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this. > > > On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon" wrote: > > > Same here in SF Bay Area > > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith >wrote: > > > >> At 1:20am here in Canada,

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Mark Hofman wrote: Guess productivity will go up ;-) You'd think so, but my experience is that when Facebook goes down the whole company will leave their desks and go to the networking people to get them to fix the Facebook. And they won't leave until Facebook is back. -

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Hello, Is www.lisp4.facebook.com working for places where www.facebook.com is down? Damien Saucez On 06 Oct 2010, at 06:47, Michiel Muhlenbaumer wrote: > Hi James, > > On 6 okt 2010, at 06:44, James Smith wrote: > >> At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On 10/5/10 10:05 PM, Larry Brower wrote: > James Smith wrote: >> At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. >> Please confirm in the USA. > > > >> ~SmithwaySecurity > >> Sent from my iPhone > > > We need "Alert" and ! in the subject? seriously? > Sorry, but I

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Yeah it's back. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Mikhail Strizhov wrote: > Works fine here, Northern Colorado. > > > -- > Sincerely, > Mikhail Strizhov > > > > > > On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote: > >> On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wro

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Still up here in Massachusetts over v4 and v6. Since 11:45am (that is PST, I believe) there is still an ongoing issue with "real-time updates" according to the Live Status page. http://developers.facebook.com/live_status Visiting that page just now, the latest API response time graphs are defi

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Smith wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. > Please confirm in the USA. > > > > ~SmithwaySecurity > > Sent from my iPhone > We need "Alert" and ! in the subject? seriously? Sorry, but I don't

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

It's back up. There goes that short burst of productivity. On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Mark Hofman wrote: Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-) On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" wrote: At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Seems to be working just fine here in Toronto. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Mark Hofman wrote: > Ditto In AU and from other reports US. > Guess productivity will go up ;-) > > > > > On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" wrote: > > > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this. On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, "Mike Lyon" wrote: > Same here in SF Bay Area > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith wrote: > >> At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is >> down. >> Please confirm in

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Works fine here, Northern Colorado. -- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote: On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote: At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, James Smith wrote: At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA. Down from FL...but like last time, www.lisp4.facebook.com works fine. -- Jon Lewi

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Down , down, down in NYC. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Mike Lyon wrote: > Same here in SF Bay Area > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith >wrote: > > > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is > > down. > > Please confirm in the USA. > > > > > > >

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Ditto In AU and from other reports US. Guess productivity will go up ;-) On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, "James Smith" wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. > Please confirm in the USA. > > > > ~SmithwaySecurity > > Sent from my iPhone >

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. > Please confirm in the USA. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com looks like it isn't just you .. Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night o

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Hi James, On 6 okt 2010, at 06:44, James Smith wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. > Please confirm in the USA. No reason to panic over here (.nl) --- Michiel Muhlenbaumer Atrato IP Networks

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Down here in Denver CO On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:44 PM, James Smith wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is > down. > Please confirm in the USA. > > > > ~SmithwaySecurity > > Sent from my iPhone > >

Re: Facebook down!! Alert!

Same here in SF Bay Area On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith wrote: > At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is > down. > Please confirm in the USA. > > > > ~SmithwaySecurity > > Sent from my iPhone > >

Facebook down!! Alert!

At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down. Please confirm in the USA. ~SmithwaySecurity Sent from my iPhone