of Google/YouTube Global Cache Servers
> in Türkiye
>
> *To Whom It May Concern,*
>
> I am a government officer and a colleague of Mr. Ahmet Hamdi Atalay (
> ahata...@turksat.com.tr), who serves at Türksat.
>
> Currently, internet users in Türkiye experience *Google/
*Subject:* Request for Deployment of Google/YouTube Global Cache Servers
in Türkiye
*To Whom It May Concern,*
I am a government officer and a colleague of Mr. Ahmet Hamdi Atalay
(ahata...@turksat.com.tr), who serves at Türksat.
Currently, internet users in Türkiye experience *Google/YouTube
*Thank You to all NANOG 90 Sponsors! *
*We Appreciate Your Investment in The Community*
It truly takes a village. Thank you to all attendees, sponsors, vendors, +
speakers.
*SEE SPONSORS <https://nanog.org/events/nanog-90/our-sponsors/>*
*WATCH NOW: NANOG 90 Playlist is on YouTube!*
Ha
*C**ongratulations Board Members! *
Congratulations Cat Gurinsky + Vincent Celindro, for being elected to the
NANOG Board of Directors! We are grateful for your service and look forward
to your upcoming term.
*NANOG 89 Playlist is on YouTube! *
Have you subscribed to our YouTube channel
*N88 YouTube Video of the Week *
*Check out our Most Viewed NANOG 88 Video of the Week *
*"The Proper Way To Prepare For A Network Engineering Job Interview With A
Tech Giant" with Kam Agahian.*
*Why it's worth your time:* Part 2 of a popular previous talk at NANOG 76.
Agahian
rack/click?u%3D4d708401d0e69d9dc73d1c204%26id%3D9f17166ea3%26e%3De429f79d5a&source=gmail&ust=1689359470714000&usg=AOvVaw1jlWOgV_AreS6w4sJjy0OR>
*NANOG 88 YouTube Video of the Week*
*WATCH NOW: "Dive Deep on AWS Networking Infrastructure"*
*Why it's worth your time: *"Dive deep"
On 3/11/21 2:28 PM, Jared Brown wrote:
Out of interest, why does it take multiple weeks to edit a GEO IP entry?
I have no idea /why/. I only know that it /is/.
I /assume/ -- from a place of ignorance about the innards of the process
-- that there is validation and manual approval. I also /a
Grant Taylor wrote:
> The process takes multiple weeks.
Out of interest, why does it take multiple weeks to edit a GEO IP entry?
I wonder why Google even has this problem at all. If you've so much as looked
at Google maps or used any app that uses location services then Google knows
with a high
On 3/11/21 1:05 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
His email: Mar 8, 2021, 10:08 AM (3 days ago)
The current date and time: 3:03 PM Thursday, March 11, 2021 (EST)
The process takes multiple weeks.
You do the math.
My email with recommendations: 10:23 AM Thursday, March 11, 2021 (MST)
The current date
On 3/11/21 12:57 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
The lack of response to the problem from Google's team is the
knowledge that we're working with.
It may be the knowledge that /you/ are working with. /I/ am working
with different knowledge.
As stated in another reply, "I know / have witnessed multip
>How do you know that the OP's problem hasn't been resolved?
I asked him. He said "no". Do we have to debate the opinion of fixed or
what no means?
>Presuming the OP did leverage the suggestions that I provided, how can
you say "no resolution" when it's been ~2 hours for a process that I
indica
o: "Nate Burke"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 3:36:43 AM
Subject: Re: How to Fix IP GEO for google/youtube tv
Google has its internal GeoIP team.
But the data quality is not so good, but they don't wanna improve it for some
reason.
On Mon, Ma
The lack of response to the problem from Google's team is the
knowledge that we're working with. What more do you need to know? If it
quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it's probably
a duck. You don't need a DNA test.
You're entitled to your opinion just as the rest o
On 3/11/21 12:28 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no
charge, I'm not sure he's entirely wrong in that statement.
Difficult of doing something is not directly related to people's
willingness / desire to do it.
I can guarantee you that ther
>
> Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no charge,
> I'm not sure he's entirely wrong in that statement.
>
No, it's still wrong.
Stating that Google's team 'doesn't want to improve things' , while also
having zero knowledge of the reasons why the current issues are pres
Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no charge,
I'm not sure he's entirely wrong in that statement.
The fact that this thread exists, the latest of multiple, and has ended in
no resolution to the problem once again is a testament to how Google
responds to this problem.
J
On 3/11/21 2:36 AM, William Guo wrote:
but they don't wanna improve it for some reason.
That is both unfair and wrong.
I know for a fact that they do want their internal GeoIP to be as
accurate as possible and that they do want to improve the inaccuracies
if and when possible.
I have perso
months with no ETA on a fix. That is the only service for me
>> that is having a location problem.
>>
>>
>> On 3/7/2021 7:19 PM, t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
>> > Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for google websites and
>> > youtube/tv because I am getting
last 7 months with no ETA on a fix. That is the only service for me
> that is having a location problem.
>
>
> On 3/7/2021 7:19 PM, t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for google websites and
> > youtube/tv because I am getting customers s
and they
don't know how to fix them. It's been escalated to engineering for the
last 7 months with no ETA on a fix. That is the only service for me
that is having a location problem.
On 3/7/2021 7:19 PM, t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for g
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 10:08 AM wrote:
> Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for google websites and
> youtube/tv becaus
Can anybody tell me how to fix my IP block for google websites and
youtube/tv because I am getting customers saying they are out of the
country and I tried to apply for the google isp portal and I have not
gotten anything back on this.
Thanks Tim
Josh Luthman
> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:01 PM Nate Burke wrote:
>>
>> Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google? I've had a ticket open
>> f
YouTubeTV does better geolocation if the network connection is WiFi. In
that case, geolocation can reference the WiFi database that Google scrapes
when they take the Streetview video.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Nate Burke wrote:
> Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google? I
Did you try this? https://support.google.com/websearch/workflow/9308722
Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:01 PM Nate Burke wrote:
> Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google? I'
Anyone here from the Youtube TV side of Google? I've had a ticket open
for 2 months on one of my /24 subnets getting the wrong City location.
Every ticket reply from Google confirms that they see the incorrect
location, They reference that it is part of a larger geo-location
problem
Back up in south central texas
-Aaron
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+aaron1=gvtc@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Bryce
Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:42 PM
To: Ishmael Rufus
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Youtube Outage
I concur, all of my systems have it as back up.
Thanks ~ Bryce
Australia too….
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Oliver O'Boyle
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
>>>> To: marshall.euba...@gmail.com
>>>> Cc: North American Network Operators'
18 at 10:14 PM Nathan Brookfield <
> nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Australia too….
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Oliver O'Boyle
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
>> *To:* marshall.euba...@g
>>
>> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Oliver O'Boyle
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
>> To: marshall.euba...@gmail.com
>> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
>> Subject: Re: Youtube Outage
>>
>>
>>
>> Same in
Well at least the BGP looks good this time and it's not being sent to Pakistan.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth McRae via
NANOG
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 8:40 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Youtube Outage
Is this widespread?
gt;
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Oliver O'Boyle
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
>>> *To:* marshall.euba...@gmail.com
>>> *Cc:* North American Network Operators' Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: Youtube Out
Oh yeah, hitting me hard in South Central Texas... no youtube videos at all for
my customers.
-Aaron
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ross Tajvar
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 8:43 PM
To: Kenneth McRae
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Youtube Outage
You beat my email
ote:
>
>> Australia too….
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Oliver O'Boyle
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
>> *To:* marshall.euba...@gmail.com
>> *Cc:* North American Network Operators' Group
>> *Subject:* Re
2018 1:08 PM
> *To:* marshall.euba...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* North American Network Operators' Group
> *Subject:* Re: Youtube Outage
>
>
>
> Same in Montreal.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks <
> marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Australia too….
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Oliver O'Boyle
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
To: marshall.euba...@gmail.com
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Youtube Outage
Same in Montreal.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks
mailto:mar
Same in Montreal.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
> Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter.
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> >
> > You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANO
Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG
> wrote:
>>
>> Is this widespread?
>
>
Same issue for me in Vancouver. My direct peering in Germany has the same issue.
Thanks ~ Bryce Wilson, AS202313
> On Oct 16, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG
>> wrote:
Tmobile, and syringa no youtube
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 19:42, Kenneth McRae via NANOG
wrote:
> Is this widespread?
>
You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG
wrote:
> Is this widespread?
>
Is this widespread?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Hello,
Does anybody know what is reported in the ‘debug_info’
portion of the YT redirector mapping webpage:
http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
Is this documented somewhere? Thanks.
-- Vaibhav
--
Vaibhav Bajpai
www.vaibhavbajpai.com
Postdoctoral Researcher
Youtube is aware, according to a boilerplate message in their support forum:
Hi there, welcome to the YouTube Help Forum!
"YouTube is aware of the issue. Please stay tuned to YouTube's social media
and the forums for any announcement of a fix.
Thanks for reporting!"
On Sun, Fe
Downdetector shows a big spike in reports for youtube in the past several
hours.
http://downdetector.com/status/youtube
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> verizon wired, comcast (on a mobile device) both work in IAD's area.
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:
n Feb 12, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> >>
> >> We are getting many customer reports of YouTube streaming failures. The
> content directory and search work, but attempts to view videos results in
> "something went wrong, click to try again" error me
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
>> On Feb 12, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>>
>> We are getting many customer reports of YouTube streaming failures. The
>> content directory and search work, but attempts to view videos results in
>> "somethi
I'm seeing this as well, but only on Apple and Linux products. Seems to be
working fine on Windows.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> We are getting many customer reports of YouTube streaming failures. The
> content director
We are getting many customer reports of YouTube streaming failures. The content
directory and search work, but attempts to view videos results in "something
went wrong, click to try again" error messages. We've reproduced the problem on
AT&T, Level3, Frontier, Cox and Coma
On Tue, 10 May 2016, james machado wrote:
First I am thrilled to see older Nanog meetings making it to youtube.
Having said that can the people putting up the files put the Nanog
meeting number in the title of the videos to make it easier to search
and determine relevance?
+1 from me. I also
First I am thrilled to see older Nanog meetings making it to youtube.
Having said that can the people putting up the files put the Nanog
meeting number in the title of the videos to make it easier to search
and determine relevance?
Thanks,
james
Op 14-1-2016 om 16:37 schreef valdis.kletni...@vt.edu:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:04:54 +0100, Seth Mos said:
>
>> lsintra:~# telnet 62.214.62.205 443
>
>> lsintra:~# telnet 2001:1438:1:2::d 443
>
>> Is it possible for Google to realize some form of internal
>> monitoring to catch these defunct du
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:04:54 +0100, Seth Mos said:
> lsintra:~# telnet 62.214.62.205 443
> lsintra:~# telnet 2001:1438:1:2::d 443
> Is it possible for Google to realize some form of internal monitoring to
> catch these defunct dual stack nodes?
A traceroute to both would help greatly in determi
Op 6-11-2015 om 19:17 schreef Christopher Schmidt via NANOG:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the reports.
>
> To the best of our knowledge, this issue has been resolved at this
> time. If you are still having problems connecting to YouTube CDN
> nodes, please feel free to le
time. If you are still having problems connecting to YouTube CDN
> nodes, please feel free to let me know, and I will investigate
> further.
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> > This was happening two weeks ago in the Bay Area as well. It happens
>
Hi all,
Thanks for the reports.
To the best of our knowledge, this issue has been resolved at this
time. If you are still having problems connecting to YouTube CDN
nodes, please feel free to let me know, and I will investigate
further.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Blair Trosper wrote
js Stuurman
> Infrastructure & Solutions
>
> IS (internedservices) Group
> Wielingenstraat 8 | 1441 ZR Purmerend | The Netherlands
> T: +31(0)299476185 | M: +31(0)624366778
> W: https://www.is.nl | L: http://nl.linkedin.com/in/thijsstuurman
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk be
dservices) Group
Wielingenstraat 8 | 1441 ZR Purmerend | The Netherlands
T: +31(0)299476185 | M: +31(0)624366778
W: https://www.is.nl | L: http://nl.linkedin.com/in/thijsstuurman
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Namens Niels Bakker
Verzonden: Friday,
ertain it's not AS3265 who is to blame here, an ISP I've had
pretty much zero issues with over, IPv6 or otherwise, the many years
I've been a customer.
-- Niels.
* seth@dds.nl (Seth Mos) [Fri 06 Nov 2015, 09:00 CET]:
Dear Google,
It appears that one of the Youtub
Dear Google,
It appears that one of the Youtube CDN's (in Europe, NL) is not
reachable over IPv6 from AS 20844. Can someone get back to us on this,
the company can't access any of the videos currently, although the
mainpage loads fine (over IPv6).
Kind regards,
Seth
telnet r6---s
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> If you would like to see how Google has your geolocation set, check:
> curl http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
It looks like HTTPS is broken for redirector.c.youtube.com
https://github.com/morrowc/yt_troubleshooting
might even be useful... I have not run it in a bit so it might die horribly :(
but it might also tell you something useful :)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>
>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Christopher Morrow
>> wrote:
>>
s09x03 : superx_isp_number: 8 (203.105.64.0/20) [s]
>> [jared@eng0 ~]$ curl -4 http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
>> 203.105.73.114 => sjc07x04 : superx_isp_number: 1 (203.105.64.0/20) [u]
>
> Maybe its actually telling you where youtube is serving videos from for
: 8 (203.105.64.0/20) [s]
[jared@eng0 ~]$ curl -4 http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
203.105.73.114 => sjc07x04 : superx_isp_number: 1 (203.105.64.0/20) [u]
Maybe its actually telling you where youtube is serving videos from for
that IP address, in realtime, based on a large num
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would anyone from Google care to explain to me off-list why certain
>> Youtube-content is blocked in the Netherlands while using IPv6 when it
>> is working fine via IPv4?
>>
>> Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
>>
>> The
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Christopher Morrow
>> wrote:
>>
>> geolocation is hard :(
>
> If you would like to see how Google has your geolocation set, check:
> curl http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
>
> You might w
o explain to me off-list why certain
> Youtube-content is blocked in the Netherlands while using IPv6 when it
> is working fine via IPv4?
>
> Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
>
> The IPv6-address is within 2a02:a47f:e000::/36
> (actually, it is: 2a02:a444:443b:0::::)
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> geolocation is hard :(
If you would like to see how Google has your geolocation set, check:
curl http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
You might want to force it both IPv4 and IPv6 to see if there is any difference.
Best
Marco Davids schreef op 25-6-2015 om 14:33:
> Hi,
>
> Would anyone from Google care to explain to me off-list why certain
> Youtube-content is blocked in the Netherlands while using IPv6 when it
> is working fine via IPv4?
>
> Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
>
>
Am 25.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Christopher Morrow:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Marco Davids wrote:
>>
>> Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
>
> geolocation is hard :(
geolocation is a broken concept anyway :-(
Similar to like being allowed by law to only offer some downloads of
series/mo
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Marco Davids wrote:
>
> Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
geolocation is hard :(
Hi,
Would anyone from Google care to explain to me off-list why certain
Youtube-content is blocked in the Netherlands while using IPv6 when it
is working fine via IPv4?
Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
The IPv6-address is within 2a02:a47f:e000::/36
(actually, it is: 2a02:a444:443b:0
NANOG
Request for a Google / Youtube network eng. to contact me off list to
help troubleshooting.
Thanks,
---
Cory Haessler | CNI | Network Operations Center Manager | 888-618-4638
www.cniteam.com; www.ifnetwork.biz
13888
ck that only affected IPv6.
>
> I've confirmed with other users, and YouTube is dead to us from these
> networks:
> - AS22645 (Texas Gigapop) - v4/v6
> - AS19108 (Suddenlink) - v4
> - AS40285 (Northland Cable) - v4/v6
> - AS40244 (TurnKey) - v4/v6
>
> It does seem to be r
Watching in dev tools, the CDN is returning the dreaded HTTP header 204 (No
Content), even though the entire video is buffering.
This reminds me of an outage a while back that only affected IPv6.
I've confirmed with other users, and YouTube is dead to us from these
networks:
- AS22645 (
On 09/29/2014 05:12 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6 from
multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple
operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue.
(The very few that do play stall out, even
Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6 from
multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple
operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue.
(The very few that do play stall out, even though they're buffered.)
Is this just m
t can be often be clear as mud
> > > whether I am using v6, or whether my Chromecast or Android device even
> > > implements happy eyeballs. The relatively new "experiencing problems?"
> > > butter bar that shows up beneath a video with notable buffering problems
&
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:22 PM, wrote:
> hope you
> get a level-1 guy who knows what IPv6 is
>
Is that possible?
---
-ITG (ITechGeek)
i...@itechgeek.com
https://itg.nu/
GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:17:14 -0400, ITechGeek said:
> Someone was telling me this weekend their entire network is native dual
> stack now. I haven't had a chance to confirm it yet, but he said they are
> issuing /60's to residential users using DHCPv6.
I believe the status is "every residential c
I am using v6, or whether my Chromecast or Android device even
> > implements happy eyeballs. The relatively new "experiencing problems?"
> > butter bar that shows up beneath a video with notable buffering problems
> > (even at low quality levels) sends the user through t
mplements happy eyeballs. The relatively new "experiencing problems?"
> butter bar that shows up beneath a video with notable buffering problems
> (even at low quality levels) sends the user through to details about the
> service provider, in this case HE. Over the past couple year
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ryan Shea wrote:
> Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
> Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately - so much so that I was
> thinking of squashing v6 in my house entirely. Looking for your
> experi
FWIW, loading up a lovely 1080p video now at a time when I am guessing the
HE/VZ links are running a little more hot than not and I'm getting perfect
playback and nload is showing that I hit a max of 67.9Mb/s on my tunnel. I
have not tested with _all_ full hd cat videos, but that sounds like a good
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> i have this: yt_
funny... part of the filename disappeared here :(
./yt_troubleshooting.py
>
> that I should add to a code.google.com location... and will ship you a
> copy tomorrow of as well. Running this on my home fios + he-tunne
encing problems?"
> butter bar that shows up beneath a video with notable buffering problems
> (even at low quality levels) sends the user through to details about the
> service provider, in this case HE. Over the past couple years YouTube has
> been my canary to know when I'v
exists for Android, isn't
> > working so well for the YouTube app).
>
> Happy Eyeballs is only about TCP session setup race, not how the
> established session performs. Normally with bias (headstart) for IPv6,
> sometimes (Apple) egoistic and reckless without.
>
> Best regards,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:26:37PM -0400, Ryan Shea wrote:
> video loading takes frever on Android/Chromecast/GoogleTV
> (which hints that happy eyeballs, if it exists for Android, isn't
> working so well for the YouTube app).
Happy Eyeballs is only about TCP session setup
e paths your packets cross.
Did you test at the same time of your "blast data" that the IPv6 Youtube
was working fine?
Another thing, as browsers now do "Happy Eyeballs" (which is really
horrible to diagnose issues with on OSX), did you check if everything is
really going over
On 8/20/14 9:21 AM, Ryan Shea wrote:
To be clear, I was seeking opinions/experiences on a list that was likely
to have a high occurrence of folk with v6 tunnels.
... and the suggestion you've received several times now is, "reach out
to HE, as they are quite responsive."
Good luck,
Doug
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: Best US Tunnelbroker for Youtube
On 2014-08-20 17:28, Ryan Shea wrote:
> I was attempting to determine the lowest-time-cost path to "happy wife".
Does your wife care it is IPv4 or IPv6 or just "funny cat videos"?
I think your answer sh
On 2014-08-20 17:28, Ryan Shea wrote:
> I was attempting to determine the lowest-time-cost path to "happy wife".
Does your wife care it is IPv4 or IPv6 or just "funny cat videos"?
I think your answer should be clear from that perspective.
As somebody eager to post on NANOG though one would think
> On 2014-08-20 16:55, Ryan Shea wrote:
> > Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
> > Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately
>
> Instead of saying that something is "poor", you might want to do the
> operational/technical[1
Ryan Shea wrote on 8/20/2014 9:55 AM:
Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately - so much so that I was
thinking of squashing v6 in my house entirely. Looking for your
experiences/thoughts on whether cutting ov
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Ryan Shea wrote:
Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately - so much so that I was
thinking of squashing v6 in my house entirely. Looking for your
experiences/thoughts on whether cutting ov
On 2014-08-20 16:55, Ryan Shea wrote:
> Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
> Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately
Instead of saying that something is "poor", you might want to do the
operational/technical[1] thing and include
Specifically:
- 2001:4860:400b:c01::64 returns a 204
- 2607:f8b0:4002:10::8 is about 50/50 between a 204 and 200
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5
> player is getting a "204 No Content" err
Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5 player
is getting a "204 No Content" error when it sends the stream request via
IPv6...but works fine on IPv4.
Confirmed from multiple locations in the US.
d to announce that all of the recorded presentations from
>>> Monday at NANOG 59 in Phoenix have now been posted to Youtube.
>>>
>>
>> This is really neat.
>>
>
> I agree, it's great! My only nit with it is that the aspect ratio seems to
> be wrong.
>
NANOG,
All of the recorded presentations from Wednesday at NANOG 59 in Phoenix
including the Q&A with Ladar Levison of Lavabit have now been posted to
YouTube. You may visit the NANOG 59 YouTube page at http://goo.gl/c4k5zG
Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
