On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:13 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> Rubens,
>
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> >> Not sure the RPZ hammer has been brought out in force yet. I've seen a
> few recommendations on various mailing lists, but no concerted effort.
> Unfortunately, there is no easy
David Conrad writes:
>
>
> But I would agree it is much easier to simply blame ICANN.
>
Yeah, I always blame ICANN for the bad weather :-).
jaap
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:17 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> > Perhaps this all self-polices?
>
> I figure either it does or governments get involved and that most likely
> ends in tears.
>
>
I can't wait for our gov't overloads to discover th
On Jul 6, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Perhaps this all self-polices?
I figure either it does or governments get involved and that most likely ends
in tears.
> I hate it when you are right :)
Don't worry: very rarely happens.
Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)
si
Rubens,
On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> Not sure the RPZ hammer has been brought out in force yet. I've seen a few
>> recommendations on various mailing lists, but no concerted effort.
>> Unfortunately, there is no easy/scalable way to determine who a registrar
>> for a given
>
> Not sure the RPZ hammer has been brought out in force yet. I've seen a few
> recommendations on various mailing lists, but no concerted effort.
> Unfortunately, there is no easy/scalable way to determine who a registrar
> for a given name is,
That is called RDAP, but ICANN currently blocks g
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> Depends on whether or not the Registry wants their TLD to be associated
>> with spam/malware distribution/botnet C&C/phishing/pharming and be removed
>> at resolvers via RPZ or similar. Ultimately, the Registries are responsible
>> for the poo
> Depends on whether or not the Registry wants their TLD to be associated with
> spam/malware distribution/botnet C&C/phishing/pharming and be removed at
> resolvers via RPZ or similar. Ultimately, the Registries are responsible for
> the pool the Registrars are peeing in -- it's the Registry's
On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:23:04 -0400, Christopher Morrow said:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
> > Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
> > of complaints.
> >
> >
>
> On
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:53 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> >> Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
> >> Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of
As a customer of OpenSRS they sent us a notice about the change. The
notice, and this page you linked, speak to their customer communication
about policy changes.
To be honest, I just breezed the email message and noted that it seemed
like a positive change (without knowing the reasons that pr
On Jul 6, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
>> Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
>> of complaints.
>>
>>
>
> On what metri
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
> Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
> of complaints.
>
>
On what metric? Pure volume? Percent of registrations? type of complaint by
simi
Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for Registries to
deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams of complaints.
On July 4, 2016 2:35:37 PM EDT, Mel Beckman wrote:
>I've worked behind the scenes for more than one of these outfits. I can
>tell you that dom
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> I'll go ahead and assume I wasn't the last person to get this memo
> (courtesy
> Lauren Weinstein's PRIVACY Digest):
>
>
> https://opensrs.com/blog/2016/06/icanns-new-transfer-policy-will-impact-business-customers/
>
> It does seem that thi
I've worked behind the scenes for more than one of these outfits. I can tell
you that domain registrars are basically printing money. On the other hand,
I've also been the victim of domain hijacking. I can tell you that the domain
registrars involved were less than useless in reversing the obvio
16 matches
Mail list logo
