sitioning-to-ipv6-for-simplicity-efficiency-and-modernization>
From: Matthew Petach
Sent: March 31, 2022 2:54 PM
To: Jacques Latour
Cc: Mark Andrews ; NANOG
Subject: [EXT] Re: IPv6 Only
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:36 AM Jacques Latour
mailto:jacques.lat...@cira.ca>> wrote:
Exactly
Mark Andrews wrote:
Write down what you find is broken and report it.
According to your logic, it is a lot more constructive
to write down what we find are broken with IPv6 and
report it to IETF, which will make IETF obsolete IPv6.
Masataka Ohta
iMac:owen (112) ~ % host www.amazon.com
2022/03/31 17:16:40
www.amazon.com is an alias for tp.47cf2c8c9-frontier.amazon.com.
tp.47cf2c8c9-frontier.amazon.com is an alias for d3ag4hukkh62yn.cloudfront.ne
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/networking-and-content-delivery/introducing-ipv6-only-subnets-and-ec2-instances/
> On 1 Apr 2022, at 06:44, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
>
> In short:
> Amazon
> Alibaba
> Google Cloud
>
> And a few other laggards that are key destinations that a
You have to try running IPv6 only occasionally to weed out the dependencies.
You can do this on a per node basis. Just turn off the IPv4 interface and see
how you run. I do this periodically on my Mac and disable IPv4. This also
makes my recursive nameserver IPv6 only as well. You then see w
On 2022-03-31, at 20:54, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> And yet, in order to "turn off the lights on IPv4", we're going to have to
> root through all those dark corners of code
The part that you might be missing is that those dark corners are also where
the vulnerabilities hide.
If a piece of sof
In short:
Amazon
Alibaba
Google Cloud
And a few other laggards that are key destinations that a lot of eyeball
customers expect to be
able to reach.
Owen
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 13:53 , Jacques Latour wrote:
>
> So, in 25, 50 or 100 years from now, are we still going to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:36 AM Jacques Latour
wrote:
> Exactly what I was asking, when and how will we collectively turn off the
> lights on IPv4?
>
Working on the World IPv6 Launch {day|week|forever} efforts,
I noticed an interesting pattern of companies that put up IPv6
resources, with all th
Exactly what I was asking, when and how will we collectively turn off the
lights on IPv4?
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On
> Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: March 30, 2022 7:29 PM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: [EXT] Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving For
Sites looking at the traffic they get and saying, you know what all our
customers connect to us
over IPv6 with some of them also connecting over IPv4. I think we can stop
supporting IPv4 now.
ISP’s saying this IPv4aaS isn’t getting much traffic anymore lets out source it
for the few
customers
If then industry still hasn't adopted v6 full in 25 years maybe it's v6
that should be given up it, that it clearly wasn't what customers wanted.
Perhaps we should should have a small group working on the next iteration.
-jim
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 5:54 PM Jacques Latour wrote:
> So, in 25, 50 o
Hello,
Due to popular demand ( :=)) ), we are currently offering the streaming
of the LACNIC / LACNOG event over an IP6-only channel.
Take a look at http://www2.lacnic.net/sp/eventos/lacnicxviii/stream6.html
The webpage will load over IPv4 but the video is IPv6-only
regards
~Carlos
On 7/25/12
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:48:48AM +, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Do u mean I am a cow? I stop breast feeding this year.
>
> Tina
ROGFLOL This is the best thing I have read yet this morning. Thanks for
the laugh.
>
> On Jul 25, 2012, at 9:47 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
>
> >> I'm responsible for IPv6
>>> misguided.
>>>>
>>>>> Tina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:aser...@lacnic.net]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:14 PM
&g
o: Tina TSOU
Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
The licence expired.
We will see if we can get another one.
Cheers,
as
On 25 Jul 2012, at 15:58, Arturo Servin wrote:
Oh!
We had it as a test service. We didn't know that i
Do u mean I am a cow? I stop breast feeding this year.
Tina
On Jul 25, 2012, at 9:47 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
>> I'm responsible for IPv6 deployment in my enterprise network, the
>> users are my colleagues. In this context, I'm not vendor, not
>> operator.
>
> i smell cows
>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:aser...@lacnic.net]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:14 PM
>>>> To: Tina TSOU
>>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>>>> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
>>&
> I'm responsible for IPv6 deployment in my enterprise network, the
> users are my colleagues. In this context, I'm not vendor, not
> operator.
i smell cows
gt;> Thank you.
>
> speaking as a content provider, ipv6-only service requests are misguided.
>
>> Tina
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:aser...@lacnic.net]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12
iginal Message-
>> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:aser...@lacnic.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:14 PM
>> To: Tina TSOU
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
>>
>>
>> The licence expired.
>>
>> We
Dear Randy,
I'm responsible for IPv6 deployment in my enterprise network, the users are my
colleagues.
In this context, I'm not vendor, not operator.
Tina
On Jul 25, 2012, at 5:20 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
>> My enterprise users
>
> it is generally best if vendors do not speak for users and vic
feature=player_detailpage>
> Tina
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
>> On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:49 PM
>> To: Tina TSOU
>> Cc: Arturo Ser
> My enterprise users
it is generally best if vendors do not speak for users and vice versa
randy
com]
> On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:49 PM
> To: Tina TSOU
> Cc: Arturo Servin; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Tina TSOU
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > If you know th
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Dear all,
> If you know there is any testing or commercial IPv6 only streaming video we
> can access, let me know.
> Thank you.
youtube will stream at you over ipv6 ... did you just need some thing
to stream at you over ipv6?
I think you can ev
nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
>
>
> The licence expired.
>
> We will see if we can get another one.
>
> Cheers,
> as
>
> On 25 Jul 2012, at 15:58, Arturo Servin wrote:
>
> >
> > Oh!
> >
> >
rom: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
>>> On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:27 AM
>>> To: Tina TSOU
>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming video
>>>
9d12:e12e
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
>> On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:27 AM
>> To: Tina TSOU
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: I
::e8e2:7822:9d12:e12e
> -Original Message-
> From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:27 AM
> To: Tina TSOU
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 only streaming vide
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> http://video.v6.labs.lacnic.net/jw/
> Server can not be found since yesterday. Has the URL been changed?
>
>
did you mean to email the lacnic folks?
I would suggest to read RFC3901/BCP91: ³DNS IPv6 Transport Operational
Guidelines² on this topic.
- Alain.
On 6/21/09 5:45 PM, "joel jaeggli" wrote:
> In pratice, most clients are not their own recursive resolvers.
>
> Rui Ribeiro wrote:
>
>> >Hi Steve,
>> >
>> >An IPv6 only device can "
Joe Abley wrote:
> Some time ago I checked the ORG and INFO registries and discovered
> that the number of host objects there with IPv6 address attributes was
> very small. I presumed at the time that it was either hard to find a
> registrar that would support IPv6 addresses for hosts, or that peop
On 21-Jun-2009, at 10:36, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
An IPv6 only device can "hit" your server if all the DNS hierachy
resolves through IPv6. It works the same way as in IPv4.
"Resolves through IPv6" implies a mixture of IPv6 transport and RRSet
availability. To add some more details, you need:
Hi Steve,
An IPv6 only device can "hit" your server if all the DNS hierachy
resolves through IPv6. It works the same way as in IPv4.
Rui
2009/6/21 Steve Pirk :
> Anyone have any experience with dns and ipv6? I did a lookup on a host and
> it came back with only an ipv6 record. Also shows up in i
34 matches
Mail list logo
