Now the value is back to normal. I guess just mistake by someone :)
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:57 AM Phillip Crescent
wrote:
> It seem overnight equinix set the mlpe router server max prefix value to 0
> for their 24115 ASN. This is the ASN used for all router server sessions
>
> https://www.pe
Re Frank, thanks for the quickie,
ge...@geier.ne.tz (Frank Habicht) wrote:
> it seems to be a not completely agreed/standardised question.
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947#section-2.2.4
[...]
> https://docs.ixpmanager.org/features/route-servers/#rfc1997-passthru
[...]
Yeah, I know... I
Hi Elmar,
it seems to be a not completely agreed/standardised question.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947#section-2.2.4
The BGP Communities [RFC1997] and Extended Communities [RFC4360]
attributes are intended for labeling information carried in BGP
UPDATE messages. Transitive as
Hi Chris,
ch...@noskillz.com (Chris) wrote:
> I'd personally recommend logging into the portal and opening a case,
I've done that in parallel, of course. (Also, as expected, they don't use their
own documentation, you have to point your finger to it when they want to "find
a physical asset"...Eq
I'd personally recommend logging into the portal and opening a case, this
will give you the fastest result. If you really want to email
servicedesk...@eu.equinix.com should be right assuming you're using the
fabric in Germany like your email address suggests. Otherwise, check
https://www.equinix.c
RIP Ryan's inbox
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, 5:25 PM Ryan Finnesey via NANOG
wrote:
> I know this might flood my inbox on a Friday, but I am looking for
> recommendations on sales rep at Equinix that understand the carrier
> space. I need to find out more information about their Equinix Fabric
> pro
gent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
> From: "Saku Ytti"
> To: "Mehmet Akcin"
> Cc: "nanog"
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 1:43:48 AM
> Subject
Or GTT
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: NANOG on behalf of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 12:14:10 PM
To: Mike Hammett
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Equinix LA4
Yeah he.net<http://he.net> is probably best option
On Fri, Fe
IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> --
> *From: *"Saku Ytti"
> *To: *"Mehmet Akcin"
> *Cc: *"nanog"
> *Sent: *Friday, February 7, 2020 1:43:48 AM
> *Subject: *Re: Equinix LA4
>
>
> Hey there,
>
> > I am looking for 100mbps b
iday, February 7, 2020 1:43:48 AM
Subject: Re: Equinix LA4
Hey there,
> I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in
> Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must.
Would Equinix Connect work?
https://www.equinix.com/interconnectio
-2444
469-441-8864
radev...@mejeticks.com
www.mejeticks.com
2626 Cole Ave, Suite 300, Dallas TX 75204
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 1:44 AM
To: Mehmet Akcin
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Equinix LA4
Hey there,
> I am looking
Hey there,
> I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in
> Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must.
Would Equinix Connect work?
https://www.equinix.com/interconnection-services/equinix-connect/
Lot of people in the past have preferred
Imtiaz ; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Equinix Dallas IXP ? Down ?
No issues here.
Erich Kaiser
The Fusion Network
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz
mailto:fai
No issues here.
Erich Kaiser
The Fusion Network
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Quick question, is there known issue with Equinix Dallas IX
I see no issues on 2 separate Equinix Dallas connections.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM Faisal Imtiaz
wrote:
> Hello,
> Quick question, is there known issue with Equinix Dallas IXP ?
> (Or it is just our connection ? Seeing all peers down).
>
> Thanks.
> Regards.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snapp
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, at 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the
> Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order
> that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe
>
I'll second Martijn's comment and add this: Never choose "Next Available."
It's the easy route up front but painful the rest of its life. We started
predetermining where we wanted each of our xconnects (regardless which colo
company) and submitting the port numbers with tickets / Equinix
portal-bas
On 05/12/2019 17:10, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
You're probably best off ordering those crossconnects through the
Equinix portal, then you can choose the exact positions for the order
that goes to the facility rather than relying on a human to transcribe
them correctly from your PDF.
If o
have
> to contact them again and it just continues on and on like this.
>
> I was just wondering.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Clayton Zekelman
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:52 AM
> To: Drew Weaver ; 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Re: Equinix
&g
ntinues on and on like this.
I was just wondering.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Zekelman
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:52 AM
To: Drew Weaver ; 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Re: Equinix
Is it a specific IBX? We've noticed no issues at CH1
At 08:37 AM 05/12/2019
We have seen this amongst other DCs as well, good help is hard to find :)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:38 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I am wondering if anyone else has had a really hard time working with
> Equinix over the past 6 months. It just seems like everything we try to do
> ge
Is it a specific IBX? We've noticed no issues at CH1
At 08:37 AM 05/12/2019, Drew Weaver wrote:
Hey all,
I am wondering if anyone else has had a really hard time working
with Equinix over the past 6 months. It just seems like everything
we try to do gets done incorrectly without explanatio
Appears to have just been a drill. They let us all back in within 15 mins.
-Matt
On Thu, May 17, 2018, 14:26 Luke Guillory wrote:
> Just got this.
>
>
>
>
> Dear Equinix Customer,
>
> IBX(s): DA6
> IBX Address: 1950 North Stemmons Freeway Suites 2049 & 3050 Dallas, TX
> 75207
> Ticket#: 5-1529
t;
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> To: "Mike Hammett"
> Cc: "NANOG"
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
>
>
>
&
Same issue here. Super complicated. I'm tempted to stop the process
after the first step.
I think most things involving equinix are complicated and frustrating, at
least once the contract is signed.
quot;
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM
Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net > wrote:
Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a fu
I believe this isn't the actual process, however recent reorganization
has brought with it a new tier of "entry level" order/service
management that's not fully up to speed on things.
You'll want to ask your account team for a dedicated project manager
to help with the process.
HTH,
-a
On Fri, J
On 10.06.2016 16:00, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full
> cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc.
>
> Can anyone lend any input either way on that?
Same issue here. Super complicated. I'm tempted to stop the process
after the first step.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full
> cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc.
>
> Can anyone lend any input either way on that?
>
>
there are 2 meanings (at least) to 'move', did you mean:
1) move port f
Hah. You know that I know that. :-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Reynolds"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 8:18:59 PM
Subject: Re: E
If you wanted 1/4 cab out of 1102 Grand in KC we might be able to
accommodate you as well.
On Jan 24, 2016 8:06 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs
> to be both of those due to the number of cross connects to other players
> within
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> because a /23 of ipv6 is very large :)
That’s a good reason not to use a /23, but not a good reason not to use IPv6.
>
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> #fios
>
No it’s not
On 11/12/14 11:49 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
tunnel for that...
yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese an
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
>>> tunnel for that...
>> yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
>> upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the
>> middle o
>> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
>> tunnel for that...
> yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
> upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the
> middle of my work process?
wait a sec! there's cheese? where?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:27 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for
> that...
yea.. because when
> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel
> for that...
there is no such thing as a nice tunnel
just last week i was able to get a /23 from $ISP as part of my transit
purchase with them for one location, but you still have to explain and
justify your use to $ISP (who in-turn has to explain/justify to ARIN). if
you can't do that, it really is "just cuz i want it". like someone else
said previo
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel
for that...
Indeed. I've h
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for
that...
pgpXkkUAc8thG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 01:00:54 AM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> why thought? Justification is really about having a use
> for the ips, right? and if you have 500
> servers/network-devices ... then you have justification
> for a /23 ... it seems to me.
Unless Equinix have an actual product
because a /23 of ipv6 is very large :)
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
#fios
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
>
>
> -Bill
>
>
>> On Nov 10, 20
Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
-Bill
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 15:02, "Christopher Morrow"
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. wrote:
>> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
>> justification
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. wrote:
> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
> justification these days, sadly.
why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips,
right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have
justif
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:20:44AM -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> > Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> > certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explain
On 10 November 2014 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> > Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due
> to
> > certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explaining the "rest
On 2014-11-10 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
>> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
>> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explaining the "restraints," this
> Hey,
>
> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
Without explaining the "restraints," this kinda boils down to "'cuz we
want it," which s
I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
justification these days, sadly.
Good luck nonetheless.
On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already a
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
/Ruairi
On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie wrote:
> Couldn't you put a router or VPN
Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggli
Equinix sales is broken down by region. Where are you looking to go?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 8:28 PM
To: Daniel Corbe; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Equinix Sales
I have a contact. I ill
I have a contact. I ill dig it up.
On 10/3/14, 10:33 AM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote:
>
>Equinix Sales seem impossible to reach. Should I just give up and go
>through a sales agent or can someone from Equinix sales contact me
>off-list?
>
My experience with Core Site has been that their sales people are responsive,
but their other areas not so much.
What one would expect from a Telco-owned facility.
Equinix, the sales people are less responsive, but at least when I open a
ticket with them, it gets done pretty quickly in most cas
coresite might be a good alternative if they are in the market you are
trying to get space into.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
On 10/3/14, 7:33 AM, "Daniel Cor
Well,
I am sure they haven't gone out of business. They charge so much for cross
connects that it's impossible for them to go under. Besides the power is
still up on all our racks in their various facilities.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> Sorry for the list traffic but I am having a tough time get
KINX is the best bet. http://idc.kinx.net/eng/
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Shahid Shafi wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone has experience hosting services in South Korea,
> who did you choose for colocation services and in what city?
>
> thanks,
> shahid
>
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:17:48 +, Carlos Alcantar said:
> I would agree here cross connects. We pay 15x more in cross connects per
> month then we do in just the space/power. We actually pulled out of a
> colo once our contract came to terms with one of the large colo providers
> because of th
ntar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Rogers
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:07 PM
To: PC
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: EQUIN
Here's the list pricing we received about a year ago for 60 Hudson/111 8th
in NYC: (24 month contract)
Single cab: $800/mo + $1000 setup
20A @ 208V: $605/mo + $500 setup
XC - Coax: $225/mo + $500 setup
XC - Fiber: $325/mo + $500 setup
XC - POTS: $25/mo + $100 setup
XC - T1/E1: $225/mo + $500 setup
My experience has been that the monthly rack rental fee will be a
comparative bargain to basic power and a couple in-building cross connects,
which will often more than double the cost. When shopping for any
provider, make sure you price out all the options you need in addition to
the rack space i
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, ML wrote:
> On 1/17/2013 4:49 AM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>
>> What's the going rate now a days for a rack within EQUINIX?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Ryan
>>
>>
> I would imagine this varies greatly by market and maybe even suite within
> the building
And also power/cooling r
On 1/17/2013 4:49 AM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
What's the going rate now a days for a rack within EQUINIX?
Cheers
Ryan
I would imagine this varies greatly by market and maybe even suite
within the building.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:19:10AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
> It does concern me that the only connectivity options are FE/GE, no
> 10GE at this time. Makes me wonder about how serious the service is,
> and whether I will end up with a more congested service than simply
> getting a mix of transit p
Thanks for the response to my question.
What I have received confirms this is basically a metered IXP with
route servers and a mix of paid transit/peering options. Will be
interesting to see what the participant mix is.
It does concern me that the only connectivity options are FE/GE, no
10GE at t
Bought and used ED at SV1 since mid-2004 I think. I was running a consumer
website at the time. I'm no longer with the company but when I checked
last year, they were still using it as a *backup* internet provider and
it's worked out well for them. The biggest problem back then, and
currently, i
>
>. o O ( and I don't know where equinix's building was in south florida,
>either. but I know they never showed up on our radar when we were
>hunting
>for space with dark fiber back to the NAP to feed our southern customers
>their dose of WCQ...)
>
>...david
This was the Metro Mall facility, op
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Last week, we saw some traffic about the Lightfiber problems because EqM1
is apparently in a building that's been condemned by the city or county
of Miami.
If I were to toss out purely random semieducated guess - a lot of
south florida datacenter bui
On 1/25/2012 15:11, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Amazingly, there doesn't seem to be any coverage of the incident, even in
> technical circles. Does anyone know anything they're permitted to tell
> about how a building which contained a datacenter managed to get itself
> condemned?
I've been in a few D
Is Equinix Denver the old Switch and Data site at 9706 East Easter Avenue,
Suite 160, Englewood, Colorado, 80112?
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
- Original Message -
From: "Keegan Holley"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011 4:47:37 PM
Subject: Equinix
Assuming it's not own
They have been real slow to respond to me in the past 14 days. They say it's a
24 hour turn around after calling their marketing line, I'm still waiting a
call back and I've left 3 messages.
I guess they don't want to lease a cab in TX…
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> Assumi
Thank you Richard your reply was very helpful.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:37 PM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Equinix of Candia?
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:31:34PM -0700, Ryan
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:31:34PM -0700, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Equinix only has one center within Toronto. Is there someone with a
> larger number of centers across the country?
I'm assuming when you say "like Equinix" you mean a carrier neutral colo
where you can buy from, sell to, and inter
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:32 PM
To: Paul WALL; NANOG list
Subject: RE: Equinix of Candia?
Equinix only has one center within Toronto.Is there someone with a
larger number of centers across the
Equinix only has one center within Toronto.Is there someone with a
larger number of centers across the country?
-Original Message-
From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:56 PM
To: Ryan Finnesey; NANOG list
Subject: Re: Equinix of Candia
Yes sorry it has been a long day. Canada. Is the only Switch & Data
center in Toronto?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Karch [mailto:kevinka...@vackinc.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 9:16 PM
To: 'David DiGiacomo'
Cc: Ryan Finnesey
Subject: RE: Equinix of Candi
...somehow my email got cutoff
Equinix is in 151 Front Street in Torono
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:59 PM, "David DiGiacomo" wrote:
> If you mean Canada, Equinix bought out Switch & Data so Equinix is directly
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:04 PM, "Ryan Finnes
If you mean Canada, Equinix bought out Switch & Data so Equinix is directly
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:04 PM, "Ryan Finnesey"
wrote:
> Who if anyone is the Equinix of Candia?
>
> Cheers
> Ryan
>
>
Equinix at 151 Front?
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 11/1/10, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Who if anyone is the Equinix of Candia?
>
> Cheers
> Ryan
>
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Christopher Morrow wrote:
oh, so it occurs to me that when I read the original post I read it as
'mpls network' not 'mpls p2p link', I suppose if the OP was looking for
an L2 circuit emulated across an MPLS network ... that's the same thing
as a wave (basically) at the cus
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>> We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is
>> lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I
>> think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they
On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is
> lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I
> think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they can sell you.
>
Um, if you order an MPLS connection betwee
We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is
lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I
think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they can sell you.
-Original Message-
From: Leo Woltz [mailto:leo.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, Oct
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:24:16AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> why not just buy a wave on someone's dwdm system? (why mpls, I
> suppose, for what sounds like a ptp application)
The native wavelength for most longhaul DWDM systems is 10G, and not
everybody needs to buy bandwidth in 10Gbps i
My apologies! I was still finishing up my morning coffee so it hasn't kicked in
yet.
Thank you for the explanation however!
=)
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:12:16 -0400
> Subject: Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity
> From: morrowc.li...@gmail.com
> To: brandon@brandontek
I assume you mean some l2 circuit. That is something we can do here at ntt.
www.us.ntt.net should get you to the right place.
Jared Mauch
On Oct 9, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz wrote:
> We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and
> Equinix San Jose who would the gro
m point to point on their system, or many waves if you need more
than one wave's capacity.
-chris
>
> Thanks for the heads up!
>
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:24:16 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity
>> From: morrowc.li...@gmail.com
>> To:
Hi Leo:
Just trying to understand the lingo. What do you mean by buying a "wave" on
someone's dwdm system? And what is dwdm?
Thanks for the heads up!
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:24:16 -0400
> Subject: Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity
> From: morrowc.li...@gmail.com
> T
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz wrote:
> We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and
> Equinix San Jose who would the group recommend?
why not just buy a wave on someone's dwdm system? (why mpls, I
suppose, for what sounds like a ptp application)
as much contempt as I have at times for Verizon, they've not been a bad
carrier with respect to reliability. Our MPLS cloud has been pretty stable
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Leo Woltz wrote:
> We are looking for some MPLS connectivity between Equinix Ashburn and
> Equinix San Jose who wo
On 2009-10-21, at 19:44, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
I had a S&D rep at a convention recently tell me that their prices
were much
more competitive than Equinix. I guess that's about to be out the
window.
I imagine the general practice of ${vendor1} reps telling potential
customers that their pri
I had a S&D rep at a convention recently tell me that their prices were much
more competitive than Equinix. I guess that's about to be out the window.
Jeff
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Cord MacLeod wrote:
> http://www.equinix.com/news/press/na/2009/news-5109/
>
> Thought this was relevant.
na...@bakker.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:17 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Equinix contact
>
> * stefan.fou...@neustar.biz (Fouant, Stefan) [Wed 08 Apr 2009, 17:04
> CEST]:
> >Any good clueful network Engineers from Equinix on-list? If so,
> plea
* stefan.fou...@neustar.biz (Fouant, Stefan) [Wed 08 Apr 2009, 17:04 CEST]:
Any good clueful network Engineers from Equinix on-list? If so, please
contact me off-line as I noticed some oddball network behavior at some
of your peering points.
You do realise that the people who run an Internet
94 matches
Mail list logo
