Denis Fondras writes:
> May we discuss IPv6 support ? Last time I checked, UBNT was lagging
> behind...
I've been running an IPv6 tunnel ( FIOS) with one end being
Mikrotik and the other being UBNT (ER-Lite) since January 2013. The
UBNT is in a fairly simple-minded configuration so I can't spe
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> I am interested to hear opinions on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti Networks routing
> and switching products. I know both hardware providers are widely deployed
> in WISP networks, but I am less interested in their wireless solutions and
> more in thei
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
> > Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
> > Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
> > working things out. A lot of what you have
Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
> Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
> Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
> working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
> has to still be done in command l
Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
has to still be done in command line. If you are cool with that then not
a big deal
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Colton Conor wrote:
How stable and feature rich are both of their platforms? How do both of
I have played around with the Edgerouter ER-5. It's a fairly immature
product compared to Cisco and Juniper. One of the bigger problems is that
they don't really release fixes for
>
> I personally feel like at this level of traffic, A entry level of linux
> server (like dell r210) with adequate domain knowledge is the best
> combination. It would happily do most stuff you throw at it, if you know
> how to use it. Entry level hardware solution tries to hide details from
>
EdgeRouter only support "hardware accelerated" routing with limited
features. If you start playing with firewall filters, gre tunnels etc you
would have to be careful about how they decrease your performance.
I personally tried to use a edgerouter to replace my j2350 with 300mbps
traffic. I first
I ported one of our Juniper SRX configs to an EdgeRouter Lite and it was a
relatively painless experience. I benchmarked the end results and it would
do ~1gbps without breaking much of a sweat. Not bad at all for a <$100 box.
We keep some on the shelf, just in case of an emergency. At that price,
Personally I have a simple matrix for routing and switching, if the customer
can afford it I use Juniper, if they can afford it and really want Cisco then I
will use Cisco. If the customer wants to put something in that will "just work"
for years to come I use Juniper. If they want the cheapest
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Colton Conor
wrote:
> I am interested to hear opinions on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti Networks routing
> and switching products. I know both hardware providers are widely deployed
> in WISP networks, but I am less interested in their wireless solutions and
> more in the
Should we say, both products are an acquired taste ?
:)
Are they perfect, no, but then what is ?
Do they do the Job, yes.
Do they work well ? yes.
Do they do everything under the sun ? No... but then what does ?
Each has it's own set of peculiarities.
However, what actually sets them apart from
12 matches
Mail list logo
