On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
> Just what is going on in the WISP industry for the most part. 802.11n
> so far on point-2-point links, are working quite well, cheap hardware as
> well as ease of use is playing factors in this. We are seeing 10+ mile
> N links running 60
They have not claimed this. The option to change is there if LTE
becomes a better long term solution but no one has said it will happen
(or even probably).
Either way, both technologies will continue to develop and both will
be viable players in the marketplace for quite some time.
On Wed, Jun 1
other
devices so don't think for a second you're going to get 170Mb/s down and
80Mb/s up.
LTE speeds are much more comparable to Wimax.
-Original Message-
From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:16 AM
To: Seth Mattinen; nanOG list
Subj
Mattinen; nanOG list
Subject: RE: Future of WiMax
For business purposes such as fixed wireless access for small branch
offices, it would seem that Wi-Max is superior to current GSM and CDMA
proprietary networks in that the upload/download speeds are symmetric.
It appears that GSM and CDMA networks
For business purposes such as fixed wireless access for small branch
offices, it would seem that Wi-Max is superior to current GSM and CDMA
proprietary networks in that the upload/download speeds are symmetric.
It appears that GSM and CDMA networks are based on the asymmetric low
upload bandwidth/h
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 09:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>> Lots of my clients (Wireless ISPs) have looked into deploying it,
>> however the costs are well over 20 times the cost of a unlicensed system
>> per access point.
>>
> Yeah...that is really the c
-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: Bret Clark [mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:00 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of WiMax
On 06/17/20
On 06/17/2010 09:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Lots of my clients (Wireless ISPs) have looked into deploying it,
however the costs are well over 20 times the cost of a unlicensed system
per access point.
Yeah...that is really the crux of the problem. Every WISP I know would
switch over in a h
otik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"
-Original Message-
From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rube...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:48 PM
To: Seth Mattinen
Cc: nanOG list
Subject: Re: Future of WiMax
The future of WiMAX seems a lot less promising now that FD-LTE is the
cl
they've already claimed they'll probably switch to LTE. They said it
was just a software change to do that. Of course the standard for
actually placing a phone call on it (LTE) has yet to finalized.
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:35:16 -0700
From:
attinen
Cc: nanOG list
Subject: Re: Future of WiMax
The future of WiMAX seems a lot less promising now that FD-LTE is the
clear winner for wide-scale mobile deployment, and TD-LTE, 802.11n and
proprietary technologies will compete for non-paired spectrum and/or
niche markets.
But one can build
The future of WiMAX seems a lot less promising now that FD-LTE is the
clear winner for wide-scale mobile deployment, and TD-LTE, 802.11n and
proprietary technologies will compete for non-paired spectrum and/or
niche markets.
But one can build a network with WiMAX and make money out of it;
global m
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:35:16 -0700
> From: Seth Mattinen
>
> WiMax sounds promising, but I certainly don't hear a lot about it
other
> than Sprint/Clear. Is it just that everyone that's doing wireless is
> sticking with relatively inexpensive 802.11 a/b/g/n products, or is
> WiMax really a
13 matches
Mail list logo
