It's a fraud tactic as far as I'm concerned, they markup internet only into
the hundreds of dollars a month, but if you bundle with security edge it's
very affordable, except after 12-36 months now it is even more expensive
than if you had just let them screw you initially.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 6
> I have been trying to assist someone with a business connection that runs a
> server farm. Recently the business cable modem started to short-stop port 53
> for UDP and TCP. Apparently, a transparent DNS proxy somehow got activated
> and all outbound traffic to any IPv4 or IPv6 address is in
I've been down this road many times before. You need to find your local
account manager/sales rep and ask them to remove the coding from the
account. This may result in losing the bundle price, so pair it with a
different service like Comcast Connection Pro or something like that.
Should keep it fr
We get around the brain-damage by having our router grab all DNS requests and
convert them to DoT or DoH using dnsdist. That probably won't work if you're
hosting a DNS server on your cable connection though.
Call the normal support number and have them disable the "Security Edge"
service. The
Contact made, thank you NANOG.
Access to Comcast ethernet services on a wholesale level, interconnection
for NNI to use comcast as local access, etc
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:01 PM Keith Christian
wrote:
> TJ,
>
> What are you seeking, exactly?
>
> Keith
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:46 PM TJ Trout wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know
ubject: Re: Comcast contact
"Shaw, Matthew" writes:
> Make sure the remote phone is using a low bandwidth codec too. In a
> previous life changing a remote (home) user's phone from G.711 to
> G.729 made all the difference in the world to their call quality.
i think you&#
agreed this isn't the case based on what I've seen based on my latest
former employer(s). Comcast is playing by the (generally agreed upon)
rules. what I have been seeing is a lot of other route optimizations
changing as other providers consolidate routing among latest acquisitions.
And of course,
11:10:30 -0500
From: Brandon Galbraith
To: Andy Ringsmuth
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Comcast contact
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Have you monitored your user's home Comcast connection with regards to packet
loss or latency, preferably from network-near th
>I have found Comcast rate shapes or resets long running encrypted
>sessions such as https. At $DAYJOB I had to set our SSL VPN system to
>re-key via new-tunnels every 5 minutes to keep it under their threshold
>of what looks like seven minutes for a tcp session. After that the
>sessions appear
"Shaw, Matthew" writes:
> Make sure the remote phone is using a low bandwidth codec too. In a
> previous life changing a remote (home) user's phone from G.711 to
> G.729 made all the difference in the world to their call quality.
i think you've got that backwards. 80 kbit/sec on the wire is no
On 8/6/2013 11:56 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact
> me off-list? I have an employee in Virginia who works from home using, in
> part, a VOIP desk telephone tied into our office phone system back in
> Nebraska. She's had n
If you run something like a pingplotter or MTR from pbx side towards the
Remote,
and do similar from remote towards the pbx side...
Let it run for a bit, and compare / analyse the results.. you will spot your
problem very quickly.
---
We find that the IP Transit is often overloaded betwee
t.com
www.FairPoint.com
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Galbraith [mailto:brandon.galbra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:11 PM
To: Andy Ringsmuth
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Comcast contact
Have you monitored your user's home Comcast connection with regards to packe
Have you monitored your user's home Comcast connection with regards to
packet loss or latency, preferably from network-near the SIP
termination point?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact
> me off-li
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Colin Alston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The URL Comcast gives with the spam block message is invalid. I doubt
> I'll get action through their support channels either, and I can't even
> find a useful looking one of those on their website...
The URL you want is ht
16 matches
Mail list logo
