On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Slashdot, Github etc, still no IPv6 though.
oddly github has ipv6 being announced from their ASN:
AS36459 | 2620:112:3000::/44 | GITHUB - GitHub, Inc., US
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, John Curran wrote:
There is a large number of Internet service providers who:
Not only ISPs, but also content:
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/06/05/1744246/distrowatch-finally-adds-support-for-ipv6
"When asked why DistroWatch enabled IPv6 access to their server at thi
On Jun 2, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I would be surprised if more than 10% - 20% of networks have received
> effective marketing on IPv6.
>
> Look at how many network operators that don't "get" basic network security
> alerts like "There is a long since patched vulnerability be
On 7/Jun/16 03:28, Ca By wrote:
>
> AWS / Cloudfront / Fastly - please have a look at how it is done. I think
> Cloudflare already did this.
CloudFlare already do.
Mark.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
> >
> > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> > over 10%" faster than
i just want my mtv. and the normal commercials are bad enough.
Rubens, good day.
Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:32:29PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
> >
> > https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
> >
> > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
>
On Thu 2016-Jun-02 11:05:54 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Warning: Hat = Enterprise Network Admin
Sarcasm = High
...
Sadly, I wish all these answers were some sort of carachture of reality,
but I think they are too many folks reality.
IOW:
http://ipv6excuses.com/ / https://twitter.com/
>responded, "Why not just get more IPv4 addresses? Just go back to
>IANA[sic] for more if you don't have enough already."
I can't say I'm surprised. Within the past year we've had mail from
people here on NANOG who haven't gotten the memo that Network
Solutions and Verisign are not the same comp
On Thu, June 2, 2016 15:45, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jeff McAdams wrote:
>> Yes. I had a member of an account team for a networking vendor express
>> extreme skepticism when discussing IP address plans and work I had
>> done. When describing why I went with an
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jeff McAdams wrote:
> On Thu, June 2, 2016 13:31, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> > REALLY??? I mean REALLY? people that operate networks haven't haven't
> > had beaten into their heads: 1) cgn
On Thu, June 2, 2016 13:31, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> Yes.
>>
> âREALLY??? I mean REALLY? people that operate networks haven't haven't
> had beaten into their heads: 1) cgn is expensive
> 2) there is no more ipv4 (not large amounts for la
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett > wrote:
> >> do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6
> >> deployment on the slow-boat?
> > Yes.
>
> I have a confession: I don't use IPv6.
>
> I don't use IPv6 at home be
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6
>> deployment on the slow-boat?
> Yes.
I have a confession: I don't use IPv6.
I don't use IPv6 at home because:
1. My Verizon FiOS link does not support IPv6.
2. My Cox Ca
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe
>>> wrote:
>>>
Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6
Warning: Hat = Enterprise Network Admin
Sarcasm = High
In a message written on Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Christopher
Morrow wrote:
> REALLY??? I mean REALLY? people that operate networks haven't haven't had
> beaten into their heads:
> 1) cgn is expensive
Wazzat? Isn't
"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "nanog list"
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 12:31:43 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett < na...@ics-il.net > wrote:
Yes.
REALLY??? I mean REALLY? people that operate network
--
>
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> To: "Daniel Corbe"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 11:41:33 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should
Yes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: "Daniel Corbe"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 11:41:33 AM
Subject
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if
>>> objectively that isn’t true. Perhaps th
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe > wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if
>> objectively that isn’t true. Perhaps that will help speed along the
>> adoption process.
>
>
> do we
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe
wrote:
> Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if
> objectively that isn’t true. Perhaps that will help speed along the
> adoption process.
do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6
deploy
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
>
> Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
> studies from Li
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M DSL
>> out in the sticks. That weighs the average connection time down. v6 being
>> capable on modern 4G wireless and fib
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M DSL
> out in the sticks. That weighs the average connection time down. v6 being
> capable on modern 4G wireless and fiber connections makes the average
> faster.
>
>
>
Akamai,
CenturyTel in this area provides IPv6 to DSL customers.
Thank you,
- Nich
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 10:43 AM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject:
Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M DSL
out in the sticks. That weighs the average connection time down. v6 being
capable on modern 4G wireless and fiber connections makes the average
faster.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
>
> Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
> studies from Li
https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
studies from Linkedin and Facebook.
Fair to ask your business 1) does mob
29 matches
Mail list logo
