On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe <dco...@hammerfiber.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dco...@hammerfiber.com');>> wrote: > >> Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if >> objectively that isn’t true. Perhaps that will help speed along the >> adoption process. > > > do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6 > deployment on the slow-boat? > > YMMV, but the majority of my customers are ipv6. And for those customers with ipv6, 73% of their traffic is e2e IPv6. I agree that there are many dark corners of Santa Cruz without IPv6, but the story is: the whales of content and eyeballs are on IPv6, and it is cheaper (no cgn) and faster (RUM data) than the ipv4 alternative. Does it really matter what single digit % of Alexa 1M has a AAAA?
