On Thursday, June 2, 2016, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6 > >> deployment on the slow-boat? > > Yes. > > I have a confession: I don't use IPv6. > > I don't use IPv6 at home because: > > 1. My Verizon FiOS link does not support IPv6. > 2. My Cox Cable Internet link does not support IPv6. > 3. The colo I tunnel to in order to announce my addresses via BGP does > not support IPv6. > 4. IPv6 does not offer me enough value to pony up the $500 initial and > $100/year ARIN fees I would have to pay in order to have parity with > my IPv4 installation, at least not until my other vendors support it. > > I don't use IPv6 at work because: > > 1. My employer moved half of everything to the Amazon cloud. AWS does > not support IPv6. > 2. My employer moved the other half of everything to various software > as a service vendors, none of whom implement IPv6. > > > Marketing problem? If it won't work with -any- of the vendors I do > business with, that's not a marketing problem. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > Yes, the data shows your page loads will be 10% slower than other folks.
I am sure you don't mind CB > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com <javascript:;> > b...@herrin.us <javascript:;> > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> >
