35.5612
ekim.it...@gmail.com
(UTC-8)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: -Hammer- [mailto:bhmc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 October 2011 17:10
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide,
Egypt affecte
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:47:13 PDT, "andrew.wallace" said:
> > Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look
> > at this perhaps being sabotage.
>
> It ain't sabotage till you rule out "misconfigured router".
>
> And
Mechanicsburg PA 17055
-Original Message-
From: -Hammer- [mailto:bhmc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:52 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
affected (not N.A.)
What kills me is what they have told the public. The
0
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide,
>> Egypt affected (not N.A.)
>>
>> I have been witness to N+1 HUMAN failures but never a N+1 hardware
>> failure or system/design failure that warranted questioning the
> -Original Message-
> From: -Hammer- [mailto:bhmc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 12 October 2011 17:10
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide,
> Egypt affected (not N.A.)
>
> I have been witness to N+1 HUMAN failures
I have been witness to N+1 HUMAN failures but never a N+1 hardware
failure or system/design failure that warranted questioning the need for
N+2. Usually your N+1 failure is (as already referenced) pasting in a
bad config that gets replicated or something like that. Not saying the
hardware is pe
I think it raises serious questions about RIM's DR strategy if a DB corruption
or switch failure or whatever can cause this much outage. 'Surely' RIM have an
second site that is independent of the primary (within reason) that they could
of flipped to when they realised the DB was borked. If not
Idiotberry
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 12 oct. 2011 à 17:55, Charles Mills a écrit :
> +1
> On Oct 12, 2011 11:51 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:52:02 CDT, -Hammer- said:
>>> What kills me is what they have told the public. The lost a "core
>>> switch". I don't know if they actually mean
+1
On Oct 12, 2011 11:51 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:52:02 CDT, -Hammer- said:
> > What kills me is what they have told the public. The lost a "core
> > switch". I don't know if they actually mean network switch or not but
> > I'm pretty sure any of us that work on an enterprise environme
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:52:02 CDT, -Hammer- said:
> What kills me is what they have told the public. The lost a "core
> switch". I don't know if they actually mean network switch or not but
> I'm pretty sure any of us that work on an enterprise environment know
> how to factor N+1 just for these
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:47:13 PDT, "andrew.wallace" said:
> Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look at this
> perhaps being sabotage.
It ain't sabotage till you rule out "misconfigured router".
Consider the actual real-world threat models and their likelyhoods:
1) In
1 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
> affected (not N.A.)
>
>
> And continues:
> “RIM'S SERVICE OUTAGE CONTINUES INTO DAY 2”
> http://www.channelstv.com/global/news_details.php?nid=29652&cat=Politics
>
> Fra
: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
affected (not N.A.)
Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look at this
perhaps being sabotage.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20119163-266/blackberry-service-issues-spread-to-u.s-and-canada/
Andrew
gt;
> From: Frank Bulk
> To: outa...@outages.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
> affected (not N.A.)
>
>
> And continues:
> “RIM'S SERVICE OUTAGE CONTINU
6_3-20119163-266/blackberry-service-issues-spread-to-u.s-and-canada/
Andrew
From: Frank Bulk
To: outa...@outages.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
affected (not N.A.)
A
: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt
affected (not N.A.)
And continues:
“RIM'S SERVICE OUTAGE CONTINUES INTO DAY 2”
http://www.channelstv.com/global/news_details.php?nid=29652&cat=Politics
Frank
From:andre
>>> I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much
>>> effect
>> what shutdown of egyptian domain names?
>> randy, who has a server which serves them
> there's an interesting point to be made about the geographic
> administrative and political distribution of secondaries being
>
On 2/16/11 5:37 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much
>> effect
>
> what shutdown of egyptian domain names?
>
> randy, who has a server which serves them
there's an interesting point to be made about the geographic
administrative and political
> No the BGP and the physical links were down.
What about non-Internet layer 2 links? A number of companies have
private IP networks extending into Egypt providing MPLS or other VPN
services. In addition, there are often longlines into the Gulf states
to provide the Egyptian sites with redunda
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Bush"
> To: "Fred Baker"
> Cc: "Franck Martin" , "North American Network Operators
> Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 2:37:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Local root zone (Was NYTimes: Egy
> I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much
> effect
what shutdown of egyptian domain names?
randy, who has a server which serves them
Yes all sessions were operational during that period.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Martin Millnert wrote:
> Mounir,
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Mounir Mohamed
> wrote:
> > No the BGP and the physical links were down.
>
> did you have any domestic BGP sessions up?
>
> Regards,
> Mar
Mounir,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Mounir Mohamed
wrote:
> No the BGP and the physical links were down.
did you have any domestic BGP sessions up?
Regards,
Martin
ained lit?
>
> --Richard
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Eubanks
> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:15 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html
> >>
> >> There has been in
>> withdrawal of BGP prefixes.
>
> Per the NYT article, the issue was the Egyptian "Intranet" -- people couldn't
> contact other sites within Egypt by host name, even though the routes were
> up, because they couldn't resolve .eg, .com, etc.
>
> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
>
>
>
>
>
>> withdrawal of BGP prefixes.
>
> Per the NYT article, the issue was the Egyptian "Intranet" -- people couldn't
> contact other sites within Egypt by host name, even though the routes were
> up, because they couldn't resolve .eg, .com, etc.
This is interes
ticle, the issue was the Egyptian "Intranet" -- people couldn't
contact other sites within Egypt by host name, even though the routes were up, because
they couldn't resolve .eg, .com, etc.
i'll have to check if the .eg servers were ever taken off-line.
resolution of .c
Egyptian "Intranet" -- people couldn't
contact other sites within Egypt by host name, even though the routes were up,
because they couldn't resolve .eg, .com, etc.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Never mind, Messrs. Cowie and Baker answered my question:
<http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-February/033181.html>
Couldn't have paths through Egypt if layer 2 were cut off.
(Right?)
--Richard
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Richard Barnes
wrote:
> It also seems l
MacFie wrote:
>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html
>>
>> There has been intense debate both inside and outside Egypt on whether the
>>> cutoff at 26 Ramses Street was accomplished by surgically tampering with the
>>> software mechanism
On 2/16/11 4:25 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much effect ...
ditto.
i'm not aware of any actions by the .eg registry operator, though i'll
ask, coincidental to the prefix withdrawal.
i suppose in the interests of completeness i should al
I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much effect;
that's why the bgp prefixes were withdrawn. What was effective was the
withdrawal of BGP prefixes.
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml notes, for
example, that routes *through*
On 02/16/2011 11:50, Franck Martin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Millnert"
To: "Marshall Eubanks"
Cc: "North American Network Operators Group"
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Swit
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Millnert"
> To: "Marshall Eubanks"
> Cc: "North American Network Operators Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
> Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Interne
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:15 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html
>>
>> There has been intense debate both inside and outside Egypt on whether the
>>
On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:15 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html
>
> There has been intense debate both inside and outside Egypt on whether the
>> cutoff at 26 Ramses Street was accomplished by surgically tampering with the
>&g
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html
There has been intense debate both inside and outside Egypt on whether the
> cutoff at 26 Ramses Street was accomplished by surgically tampering with the
> software mechanism that defines how networks at the core of the In
am a consultant to the Egyptian President. I am contacting you for a possible
business deal based on the present political crisis in Egypt. The conglomerate
of Mobarak is ready to partner with you to help secure the resources of the
president since the office of the presidency has been dissolved."
nd-user or if they
> were being sent as a service announcement from Vodafone.
> >>
> >> Certainly, if the government were sending the messages under the company
> name then something sounds wrong about that.
> >>
> >> What I would like is to hear from someo
nt were sending the messages under the company
>> name then something sounds wrong about that.
>>
>> What I would like is to hear from someone who received the messages and what
>> their experiences were.
>>
>
> They were described to me as being "from
On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:20 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
>> On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>>>
Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of
using
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>>
>>> Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of
>>> using its network to send pro-government text messages.
>>>
>>> htt
On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>
>> Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of
>> using its network to send pro-government text messages.
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12357694
>
> Here is the
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of using its
> network to send pro-government text messages.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12357694
Here is their PR
http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/press.html
Note
This is from a 3% to 4% estimate of telecomms and datacomms in the
overall Egyptian economy.
The OEDC communique notes that attracting foreign investment may now
be more difficult. (Is there anyone not looking at regional alternatives?)
Source:
http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011
Hi again from Network World...
We're now looking into a story on how Egypt may have restored service -- did
they bring up all routes at once? Stagger the re-introduction of routes so as
not to overwhelm routers? Any specific ISPs brought up before others and why?
ie, Noor and the
Good to see the traffic back. Graphs visualizing return of Egyptian traffic
volumes below.
Week view:
http://www.monkey.org/~labovit/egypt_back_week.png
Today:
http://www.monkey.org/~labovit/egypt_returns.png
- Craig
Craig Labovitz | Chief Scientist, Arbor Ne
been withdrawn. Even the Egyptian stock
> >> exchange - egyptse.com - now appears to be off the Internet.
> >
> > I have been told that the Egyptian Prime Minister has publicly announced
> > that the Internet would be restored soon, but at present neither my
>
>
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:30:45PM +0100,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
> EUN (the academic network, which includes the primary name server for
> .EG) is still unreachable (1130 UTC).
It works now (1137 UTC). BGP was a bit slow.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 06:23:39AM -0500,
Jim Cowie wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> Yes, confirmed from 09:29 UTC. Basically all major providers are
> back, full status quo ante (modulo reagg), major sites are up.
EUN (the academic network, which includes the primary name server fo
com - now appears to be off the Internet.
> >
> > I have been told that the Egyptian Prime Minister has publicly announced
> that the Internet would be restored soon, but at present neither my
>
> Looks like it's coming back: http://stat.ripe.net/egypt
>
> ~2500 prefix
n told that the Egyptian Prime Minister has publicly announced that
> the Internet would be restored soon, but at present neither my
Looks like it's coming back: http://stat.ripe.net/egypt
~2500 prefixes being announced now.
--
teo - http://www.teoruiz.com
"Res publica non dominetur"
net would be restored soon, but at present neither my
monitoring nor http://stat.ripe.net/egypt/ confirms this.
Regards
Marshall
> DNS for egyptse.com also appears to be down, but Noor.net is definitely
> withdrawn :
>
> dig www.noor.net
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.6.0
> Here's an updated list:
> http://www.bgpmon.net/egypt-routes-jan31-2011.txt
Some decent opportunities for route aggregation in that list...
Hi Danny,
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 11-01-31 2:41 PM Danny
O'Brien wrote:
Does anyone has a list of routes that are still up, and seem to correlate
with Egyptian locations? Andree's last list is here:
http://bgpmon.net/egypt-routes-jan29-2011.txt
Here&#x
On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We did some analysis of the situation in Egypt using the RIPEstat toolbox
> (please note, this is a prototype and we're not sure how it will handle a big
> load):
>
> http://labs.
>>
> Yep, Noor is now down.
Collateral damage from all of this, as detailed in
http://blog.icann.org/2011/01/status-report-on-the-dns-in-egypt/
is that the Arabic script top-level domain .masr (مصر)
has been unavailable since the 27th, since it is is operated by NTRA of Egypt.
Regards
Ma
Hi, Danny.
> Does anyone has a list of routes that are still up, and seem to correlate
> with Egyptian locations? Andree's last list is here:
> http://bgpmon.net/egypt-routes-jan29-2011.txt
We see the following ASNs presently:
ASN CC AS Name
6762| IT | SEABO
r front line
support, and they're saying "technical problems" that will take a few hours
to fix.
Does anyone has a list of routes that are still up, and seem to correlate
with Egyptian locations? Andree's last list is here:
http://bgpmon.net/egypt-routes-jan29-2011.txt
I'
-- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Abley"
> To: "Marshall Eubanks"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2011 7:32:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
>
>
> On 2011-01-28, at 11:33, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Benson Schliesser"
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2011 2:47:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:44 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>
Here is the analysis of BGP table regarding what happened to the Internet in
Egypt:
http://stat.ripe.net/egypt/
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/akvadrako/live_eqyptian_internet_incident_analysis
Cidr report (http://www.cidr-report.org) shows this also very well:
Recent Table History
Dear all,
On 1/28/11 1:07 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Hey all,
Some NANOG participants are seeing hearing reports of disrupted
communications in Egypt. Are any of you seeing the same thing?
--Richard
Here is the analysis of BGP table regarding what happened to the
Internet in Egypt:
http
andlines are down (at least internationally).
> 4. Mobile networks seem to be on and off depending on location. For example,
> Vodafone is apparently working in Cairo while other networks are not !!
>
> God help them and bring Egypt and Egyptians out of this harmless inshallah.
> Regards..
Owen
On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:44 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
> infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
> come back online.
>
> Andrew Wallace
>
> ---
>
> British IT Security Consultant
Y
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, jim deleskie wrote:
> iMCI or WCOM? :)
w (technically the folks that engineered it were mci folk... from texas.
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
>>
>> > For instance, o
iMCI or WCOM? :)
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
>
> > For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET
> PIP).
>
> that's the MCI PIP...
>
>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:07:51PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> On 1/28/11, andrew.wallace wrote:
> > We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
> > infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
> > come back online.
>
> Well, yeah, i
On 1/28/11, andrew.wallace wrote:
> We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
> infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
> come back online.
Well, yeah, it has to be done carefully, otherwise the first guy to
turn on an E1 line
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:44 PM, andrew.wallace
wrote:
> We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
> infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
> come back online.
>
> Andrew Wallace
>
> ---
>
> British IT Security Consultant
ht
We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
come back online.
Andrew Wallace
---
British IT Security Consultant
On Friday 28 January 2011 21:22:55 Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
> >> For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET
> >> PIP).
> >
> > that's the MCI
hours,
otherwise Fiji would have gone dark for days...
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Abley"
To: "Marshall Eubanks"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2011 7:32:07 AM
Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
On 2011-01-28, at 11:33, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
gt;>> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:07 PM
>>> To: Patrick W. Gilmore
>>> Cc: NANOG list
>>> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it do
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
>
>> For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET PIP).
>
> that's the MCI PIP...
probably the .EG parts of that PIP are provided on a partner network
st
I have also seen reports that Syria has severed their Internet access, as well:
http://af.reuters.com/article/tunisiaNews/idAFLDE70P18Y20110126
http://twitter.com/AlArabiya_Eng/status/31002490816167936
Can anyone confirm that?
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:36:30 PST, George Bonser said:
> I think it would be pretty hard to actually cut off communications when the
> telephone system is still working. You can move a lot of email by dialup UUCP
> if you wanted to.
Sure, just pop onto amazon.com and order a modem... oh, wait.
(
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
> For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET PIP).
that's the MCI PIP...
011 12:07 PM
>>> To: Patrick W. Gilmore
>>> Cc: NANOG list
>>> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>>> I think it does not matter. Censorship is censorship. (So much
On 1/28/2011 1:02 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
I wonder if anyone's working on a mesh or p-t-p radio app that runs on a
smartphone?
Yes - came across http://www.servalproject.org/ from the linux.conf.au
program.
On Friday 28 January 2011 20:36:30 George Bonser wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jake Khuon [mailto:kh...@neebu.net]
> > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:07 PM
> > To: Patrick W. Gilmore
> > Cc: NANOG list
> > Subject: Re: Connectivity status f
Here is a blog by Al Jazeera on what is happening in Egypt.
Look at the time stamp of 7:46.
Kill-Switch is alive and well.
Coming to America soon?
http://blogs.aljazeera.net/middle-east/2011/01/28/liveblog-egypts-protests-erupt
.
**
*The only power people exert
>> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
>>
>> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>> I think it does not matter. Censorship is censorship. (So much for
>> "routing around it".)
>>
>
>
> I think it w
On 1/28/2011 8:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
out of curiousity, what's the difference though between loss of light
and peer shutdown? If the local gov't comes in and says: "Make the
internets go down", you as the op choose how to do that... NOT getting
calls from your peer for interface alarms
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake Khuon [mailto:kh...@neebu.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:07 PM
> To: Patrick W. Gilmore
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
&g
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I think it does not matter. Censorship is censorship. (So much for "routing
> around it".)
Obviously for the effected, the effects are the same. |8^)
However, I'm interested in knowing about the level of fine control that
the Egyp
On 2011-01-28, at 11:33, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> I have seen nation state disconnects where light is lost.
>
> I believe that was the case for Burma, for example.
It was not the case in Nepal in 2005 though, if I remember correctly. In th
Jim,
On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:43 PM, wrote:
> And would you comply with it if it indeed became law?
For better or worse, companies will comply with lawful requests. In the event
of US Civil Unrest, I think it would be much harder than in other regimes to
exert this type of control, and would c
pting your
operations in Egypt, Northern Africa and/or the Middle East? Have you noticed
any resumption of service since the outage went into effect on Thursday, Jan.
27?
Also, a bill was introduced recently in Congress proposing an Internet "kill
switch" to be used, apparently, in resp
n Canada this morning...
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2011/01/28/egypt-protests.html
Internet, data services cut
Internet and cellphone data service was unavailable throughout the country,
making it impossible for news of the protests to be broadcast via social
networking sites like Facebook and
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:17:58 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Jake Khuon wrote:
>
> > I guess this begs the question of whether or not we're seeing actual
> > layer1 going down or just the effects of mass BGP withdrawals. Are we
> > seeing lights out on fibre links
Does anybody knows what is the situation with local traffic, are
people able to communicate within the country, are there any local
servers/services that are being blocked/etc. ?
-J
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I have seen nation state disconnects where light is lost.
I believe that was the case for Burma, for example.
Marshall
>
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I have seen nation state disconnects where light is lost.
The question is not whether that would it (it obviously would). The question
is whether it is important if the laser stops blinking or just blinks in ways
that end users can't see all
I have seen nation state disconnects where light is lost.
Jared Mauch
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Jake Khuon wrote:
>
>> I guess this begs the question of whether or not we're seeing actual
>> layer1 going down or just the effec
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> I guess this begs the question of whether or not we're seeing actual
> layer1 going down or just the effects of mass BGP withdrawals. Are we
> seeing lights out on fibre links or just peering sessions going down?
> Both could still point to a
On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Patrik Wallström wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>
>>> Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of in
>>> Syria (where I have not heard of reports
On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Patrik Wallström wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
>> Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of in
>> Syria (where I have not heard of reports of protests).
>>
>> I have no confirmation of this as yet.
>
On 28/01/2011 15:15, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of
in Syria (where I have not heard of reports of protests).
I have no confirmation of this as yet.
AS29386 (Syrian Telecommunication Establishment) appears to be up at this
time
On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of in
> Syria (where I have not heard of reports of protests).
>
> I have no confirmation of this as yet.
I have seen no evidence if this. Can still reach services withi
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
