---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >
>> > Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
>> > how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
>> >
>>
>> Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR
Paul Ferguson expunged (fergdawgs...@gmail.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
> > how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
> >
>
> Admittedly, my
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Bob Snyder wrote:
Linecards are interesting. We get a 100Gb card, we get a linerate
14-port 10Gb card, but apparently there's still only a single port
OC-768 40Gb card.
There has been claims that volume for OC-768 is low so no major effort has
been seen to reduce OC-768
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to "new" CRS-3.
T1600 - 250 Gbps full duplex /
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to "new" CRS-3.
Both companies looks like want to re
Cisco and linerate...if it would be a Juniper I could say OK, on a Cisco, first
see then believe.
Also, seeing CRS-1's, is the '3' in CRS-3 the multiplier or magnitude of
problems to be expected compared to its 'little' buggy sister.. ? :)
-Original Mess
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Gregory Hicks wrote:
> The press release at
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html states that the
> pricing for the CRS-3 STARTS AT $90K...
Is that the cost for a nameplate you can stick on an empty rack with
dark glass so you can fo
> Subject: Re: CRS-3
> From: David Conrad
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:06:39 -0800
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> >> Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost?
> > Admittedly, my information on these top
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, David Conrad wrote:
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Power is fairly easy, you need somewhere in the order of 14kW per rack (at
least you need to provision that
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost?
> Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR these days. :-)
>
> They said it costs ~US$90k, and that AT&T was in trails.
Somehow, I'
al Message-
From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patr...@ianai.net]
Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 11:02 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: CRS-3
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> The only "wow" here is "wow, w
or translate the
> marketspeak.
>
> Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
> how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
>
> Or perhaps more interestingly, given the way things seem to be going, how
> many (tens of?) mi
On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Crooks, Sam wrote:
> "Spend the GDP of a small nation on a single box!"
I'll admit to being too lazy to dig through and/or translate the marketspeak.
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or how much
power it would con
On 3/9/2010 9:19 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever
I fail to see how using linksys's range of products is going to be comparable
to enterprise grade cisco gear. Well, your average consumer wouldn't be
involved with a CRS or for that matter, anything that remotely resembles a CRS.
Not sure why you'd pull the consumer market into this marketing
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
>
> So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
>
>
> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
> - Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minu
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthew Petach wrote:
/me sits back patiently and waits for CRS-5, then...[1]
CRS-3 is ~3 times as fast as CRS-1, so I guess the next iteration will be
CRS-12 and then CRS-36, CRS-108 (perhaps CRS-100 just to make it easy).
:P
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm
"Spend the GDP of a small nation on a single box!"
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfe...@mac.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org list
> Subject: CRS-3
>
>
> So who is going to be the first to deploy the
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Durack
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:39 PM
> To: Brian Feeny
> > Subject: Re: CRS-3
>
> "This intelligence also includes carrier-grade IPv6 (CGv6)"
>
> Can't wait to find out what this is.
"accel
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Express Web Systems
wrote:
>> Wow what?
>>
>> Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
>>
>> If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per
> slot,
>> and pre-relea
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:45 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 17:31, Jake Khuon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-03-0
> It's called doing the "wall street dance". Their stock price jumped 3%
> yesterday in anticipation of the "big" announcement. Hype is hype, and
> people still remember the magic of the dotcom bubble. "ZOMG! They increased
> the size of the tubez! BUY! BUY!"
>
> [full disclosure: I own stock in Ci
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 17:31, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only "wow" here is "wow, why
No one ever got fired for buying Cisco?
(This isn't true btw -- I know of people that did get fired for buying Cisco.
Just saying...)
J
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisc
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
> >> are?"
> >
> > Because in some organisatio
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 20:22 +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
>> What happened to CRS-2? :)
>
> It exploded and was destroyed during construction. Parts of it were
> also recycled to build the next CRS. |8^)
/me sits back patiently and waits fo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
> >> are?"
> >
> > Because in some orga
It only supported IPv5. :)
Scott
[1]deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
--Original Message--
From: Robert Enger - NANOG
To: David Hubbard
Cc: [2]na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
>> are?"
>
> Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.
Then why bother hyping at all?
It's teh future of the tubes! Didn't you get the memo?
Nah, actually it is just hardware assisted SP-wide NAT... See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/white_paper_c11-558744-00_ns1017_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html
Cisco believes that this is the (intermed
On 9. mars 2010, at 22.39, Tim Durack wrote:
> "This intelligence also includes carrier-grade IPv6 (CGv6)"
>
> Can't wait to find out what this is.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/white_paper_c11-558744-00_ns1017_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html
--
Joachim
On 3/9/2010 4:39 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
>>
>> So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
>>
>> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
>>
>>
>> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
>> - Stream every m
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
>
> So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
>
>
> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
> - Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minu
Yes, and their stock price dipped today after the news release actually hit.
So remember people, buy on rumor, sell on news.
Brian
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Express Web Systems wrote:
>> Wow what?
>>
>> Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping
Renaming the 6500? Nice one, let's call it 7600 then :-)
Arjan
-Original Message-
From: bas [mailto:kilo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 9:33 PM
To: Brian Feeny
Cc: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: Re: CRS-3
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote
> If nothing else y
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 20:22 +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
> What happened to CRS-2? :)
It exploded and was destroyed during construction. Parts of it were
also recycled to build the next CRS. |8^)
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
> are?"
Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network En
> Wow what?
>
> Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
>
> If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per
slot,
> and pre-release equipment is in use in some networks already.
>
> The only "wow" here i
ubbard
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: CRS-3
> Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
>
>
> Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
> already? :-)
>
> She said it was great for drying her clothes.
> If she gets the CRS-3, will she
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Feeny wrote
> If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
Indeed Cisco marketing machine.
Nothing new to CRS-1, just new linecards and route-processor.
It would be like giving the CAT6500 a new name back when the
SUP720/DCEF cards came out.
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:51:28 -0500
Brian Feeny wrote:
>
> So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
>
>
> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
Is that about 11 giggitybits per second?
> - Stream every
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
> LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment..
>
> But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps
LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment..
But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!
> Subject: RE: CRS-3
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:54:16 -0500
> From: dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com
> To: nanog@nanog.org
>
> From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfe...@mac.com]
> >
> > So w
What happened to CRS-2? :)
--Original Message--
From: Robert Enger - NANOG
To: David Hubbard
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
already? :-)
She said it was great for
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
already? :-)
She said it was great for drying her clothes.
If she gets the CRS-3, will she be able to dry her clothes even faster?
On 3/9/2010 11:54 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
The article about this in the te
Yes, it says that right in the press release.
J
--
Joel Esler
joel.es...@me.com
http://www.joelesler.net
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010, at 03:09PM, "Brandon Galbraith"
wrote:
>It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
>
>On Mar 9, 2010 1:53 PM, "Brian Feeny" wr
On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
Maybe Peter Lothberg is testing one in his basement? :)
-b
It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
On Mar 9, 2010 1:53 PM, "Brian Feeny" wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Str
n less than four minutes
>
> If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
>
> Brian
The article about this in the tech section on CNN
already has comments in it like "Oh, well Cisco
owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will
my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can
download at those speeds?" LOL
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minutes
If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
50 matches
Mail list logo
