On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:22:16 +0000 deles...@gmail.com wrote: > What happened to CRS-2? :)
I agree. We were joking at work what the announcement might be and I suggested a CRS2. Missed it by >< much :-( > ------Original Message------ > From: Robert Enger - NANOG > To: David Hubbard > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: CRS-3 > Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM > > > Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement > already? :-) > > She said it was great for drying her clothes. > If she gets the CRS-3, will she be able to dry her clothes even faster? > > > > On 3/9/2010 11:54 AM, David Hubbard wrote: > > > > The article about this in the tech section on CNN > > already has comments in it like "Oh, well Cisco > > owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will > > my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can > > download at those speeds?" LOL > > > > > > > > > On 3/9/2010 11:54 AM, David Hubbard wrote: > > From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfe...@mac.com] > >> So who is going to be the first to deploy these? > >> > >> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html > >> > >> > >> - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second > >> - Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minutes > >> > >> If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine! > >> > >> Brian > > The article about this in the tech section on CNN > > already has comments in it like "Oh, well Cisco > > owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will > > my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can > > download at those speeds?" LOL > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
