OARC 43 - Call for Contribution (location and date changs)

will be provided when registration opens. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee For OARC 43 we are open to patronage and donations to fund t

OARC 43 - Call for Contribution

n registration opens. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee For OARC 43 we are open to patronage and donations to fund the Workshop and asso

OARC 42 - Call for Contributions (co-located with NANOG 90)

lease note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.) John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

OARC 41 - Call for Contribution -- deadline extension & location announcement

ssi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact spon...@dns-oarc.net if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and

OARC 41- Call for Contributions

t OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.) John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

Re: Yondoo provided router, has "password" as admin pw, won't let us change it

eelhouse of their tier 1 support, which was all we could get a hold of. Thanks to everyone who's responded -- I value all of your input. Cheers, Todd On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:09 PM Jason R. Rokeach via NANOG wrote: > It’s been a while, but attacks that take advantage of this a

Reminder OARC 40 - Call for Contribution

ontact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact spon...@dns-oarc.net if your organization is int

Reminder OARC 40 - Call for Contribution

ontact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact spon...@dns-oarc.net if your organization is interested i

DNS OARC 40 - Call for Contribitions

. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact s

Extended Deadline and Reminder OARC 39 - Call for Contribution

e provided when registration opens. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissi...@dns-oarc.net John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social

DNS-OARC 39 Call for Contributions

amme Committee:     https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events.  Please contact if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run

Re: Carrier Options in Bogota

c/telcomindedness reasons are better covered by transit arrangements. For the nations in which we are deployed with them, EdgeUno has solved most of those issues for us. Tests are possible via their LG: https://lg.edgeuno.com/ JT -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

OARC 38 Call for Contributions

https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events.  Please contact if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit

Re: Certificates for DoT and DoH?

gistry data. For example, we had to activate web servers and objects on our anycast network to answer specific queries during some of the check processes. TL;DR: Digicert is still the only player for v6 signing, and it will not be entirely hands-free to manage but also not overly difficult. JT -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

various “speed testing” servers in their own networks, which may not truly provide accurate measurements of anything other than local loop speeds, which now sort of defeats the purpose of the speed test for anything other than the most local set of results. JT -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net

Re: DNS-OARC 37 Call for Presentations

r concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee -- John Todd - jt...@quad9.net - +1-415-831-3123 General Manager - Quad9 Recursive Resolver

DNS-OARC 37 Call for Presentations

February 2022. It would be very useful to have your slides (even if draft) ready for this. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via John Todd, for the DNS-OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on spons

Re: Famous operational issues

There are all the hilarious leaks and blocks. Pakistan blocks youtube and the announcement leaks internet-wide. Turk telecom (AS9121 IIRC) leaks a full table out one of their providers. So many routing level incidents they're probably not even interesting any more, I suppose. The huge power out

Re: favorite network troubleshooting tools (online)

makes life much easier. Todd On Thursday, 16 July 2020, Adam Thompson wrote: > I see NLNOG’s IRRexplorer has been mentioned, but what about the NLNOG > RING <https://ring.nlnog.net/> ? There’s a publicly-reachable LG ( > lg.ring.nlnog.net) but you have to sign up for acc

Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters

However, if you are stopped and don't have a letter, you're much more likely to trigger the "bozo making stuff up" detector and get sent home. Virtually no one stops to print out a weird document on their way to buy beer. I'm aware of security guards and telecom techs who have been sent home for

Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

and just to check one thing... On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Daniel Sterling wrote: > I don't particularly *want* to block or advocate blocking QUIC, but if > I keep hitting the issue and can't help people troubleshoot, what > other sane option have I? > i don't think you've addressed the "re

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Call of Duty Modern Warfare Update came out yesterday. https://dotesports.com/call-of-duty/news/cod-mw-update-version-1-13 On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 10:21, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > > On Jan 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Kaiser, Erich wrote: > > > > Yeah we saw that as well. Must be a game release or so

Re: ECN

as one of the authors of that talk, it definitely is "a thing", has been for years and years and years, and indeed, mostly works. t On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:18 PM Hunter Fuller wrote: > It is certainly odd, but it's definitely a "thing." > > https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presenta

Re: D'oH III: In 3-D! Plot Twist from Google/Chrome, Vixie approves?

the relevant sentiment is: thanks for whitelisting a fixed number of them so i can block them. t On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:42 AM Royce Williams wrote: > The difference is that Chrome won't use resolvers other than the ones > you've configured yourself, and will simply opportunistically upgrad

Re: Colombia Network Operators Group

References to all things Colombian being related to drugs and smuggling are racist. Please don't be racist here. Thanks! t On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <6f2876a6abe02547ba85adb58bd21...@mail.dessus.com>, > "Keith Medcalf" wrote: > > >Fascinating. W

Re: IPAM recommendations

nts to evaluate your software/hardware/datacenter space/networking gear etc. best, t On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Not much beyond this, > https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/ > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood

Re: IPAM recommendations

What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific interesting findings so far? Thanks! t On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source

Re: 44/8

silently deleting the thread isn't noise. posting that was, randy. t On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:23 PM Randy Bush wrote: > my deep sympathies go out to those folk with real work to do whose mail > user agents do not have a `delete thread` key sequence. >

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

This is truly awful and off topic for network engineering. Please stop and try to listen to the people who are offering you feedback. On other lists. Not here. Thanks! T On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 21:05 Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan Hello Everyone, > > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy

Re: Amazon now controls 3.0.0.0/8

google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC). t On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse wrote: > > I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24? > > -Steve > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer wrote: > >> I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at t

Re: CVV (was: Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling)

This is a confusing and off-topic discussion with respect to network engineering. But for completeness: Payments systems are architected by fraud rates, not by isolated security requirements or engineering mandates, as i think most network engineers can understand. The fraud rates in the US for

Re: courtesy

the "please" distributes to both clauses and the difference is a matter of style rather than substance. job's point is sound and correct. please try to respect his firm suggestion. thanks, t On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > --- j...@instituut.net wrote: > People - pl

BCP 38 addendum (was: New Active Exploit: memcached on port 11211 UDP & TCP being exploited for reflection attacks)

ul of adopters. —Todd > On Feb 28, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Job Snijders wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:52:54PM +, Chip Marshall wrote: >> On 2018-02-27, Ca By sent: >>> Please do take a look at the cloudflare blog specifically as they >>> name and shame OVH a

Re: list blockchain

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:05 AM, Tom Hill wrote: > On 28/01/18 18:38, Todd Underwood wrote: > > Moderators: even when posts are by long term members of the community can > > you remind them of the list purpose when they forget, please? Thanks! > > Randy's post has provi

Re: list blockchain

This isn't off-topic noise at all. Nope. Nothing to see here. Move along. Moderators: even when posts are by long term members of the community can you remind them of the list purpose when they forget, please? Thanks! T On Jan 28, 2018 13:04, "Andrew Kirch" wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:

Re: media are reporting "major Internet outage"

There's a whole lot of 'Comcast and L3 are having problems' on Reddit. Nothing much beyond that. On Nov 6, 2017 21:47, "Miles Fidelman" wrote: > Folks, > > It seems like various media outlets are reporting a "major Internet > outage" - some going so far as to call it an "attack." > > A few headl

Re: Puerto Rico: Lack of electricity threatens telephone and internet services

This thread is mostly full of idle speculation, is at the least insensitive and verges on offensive. If you have operational information about Puerto Rico (see Sean Donelan's posts rather than these responses), please go ahead. If you would like to allocate blame, please go somewhere else to do it

Re: Puerto Rico just lost internet?

the entire island is now without power: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-41340392 no bueno. t On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Mehmet A

Re: Puerto Rico just lost internet?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at5.shtml?cone#contents it's still south of san juan but maría will move across the island all day today. t On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Daniel Brisson wrote: > “Strongest storm of the century” just hit San Juan. > > -dan > > > > — > > Dan Brisson > Network

Re: Question to Google

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > it's a whacky world. as geoff said long ago, if there ever is real > money counting on v6 transport, these messes will straighten out. > totally agree. and i'd like someone else to volunteer the "real money" traffic, please. :-) t

Re: Question to Google

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > There are many zones (including your isc.org) that have several name > servers dual-stacked, and they didn't notice a problem. Furthermore, > since the DNS is a tree, resolution of google.com requires a proper > resolution of the roo

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

I still believe the onus is on them to justify the extension of these costs, regardless of what was in the agreement. Todd Grand -Original Message- From: Luke Guillory [mailto:lguill...@reservetele.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:39 AM To: Todd Grand Cc: NANOG Subject: Re

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

construed as fraudulent charges. Todd Grand -Original Message- From: Luke Guillory [mailto:lguill...@reservetele.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:08 AM To: Todd Grand Cc: Eric Dugas ; Graham Johnston ; NANOG Subject: Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations On

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

fraud. Todd Grand -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+tgrand=tgrand@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:00 AM To: Graham Johnston Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations >From what I

Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites

I am not familiar with Cogent’s architecture but why couldn’t they just null route the IP address at their edge routers from within Spain? I am not a lawyer but from what I understand, since the Spanish government has zero say on what goes on outside of their borders, a court order that may or m

Re: dilemmas

randy, On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > yep. and thanks for the forward, reminding my why i have a long > .procmailrc. > if this is an attempt to simply publicly mock someone on the nanog list i have a polite request: keep your snark to yourself. this kind of uncivil be

Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?

to answer the actual question: all abuse mailboxes have quotas, either implicitly or explicitly. the amount of storage available to any given mailsystem is finite. technically correct. it's the best kind of correct. :-) t On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote: > For the l

Re: colo at 111 8th ave NY?

Ditto > On Jun 24, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Sean Watkins wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for a rack or half rack at 111 8th ave NYC. > > I've tried going via sales at Equinix etc and few other carriers, it seems > to never go anywhere... > > Can anyone who is there, and wants to sell some space cont

Re: Sunday night social?

ne > >> On Jun 12, 2016, at 15:08, Todd Underwood wrote: >> >> surely this is not the same randy bush that loves to point out that >> humans are social animals! >> >> t >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>>>

Re: Sunday night social?

surely this is not the same randy bush that loves to point out that humans are social animals! t On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> Is Wednesday night the only social? >> Yes. > > damn! if i had known there was a chance of folk acting more like sober > adults than the usual

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Fixed it for you > On Jun 5, 2016, at 10:38 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > > > They buy from 2 or more wholesale transit providers and in general they > opportunistically bureaucratically peer, although scale helps a lot there.

Re: craigslist.com admin

According to bgp.he.net and ARIN, craigslist has 2620:7E::/44 which is announced on several transits. Curious as to what they use it for if not Web, MX, or DNS. —Todd > On Jun 2, 2016, at 2:00 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > apparently Craigslist doesn't have an IPv

Re: ATT Mobile Outage San Juan, PR 8+ hours, 1 Million out.

http://www.univision.com/noticias/comunicacion/cerca-de-un-millon-de-abonados-de-at-t-sin-servicio-en-el-pais-debido-a-averia for spanish speakers. they say it's a "hardware" issue that caused the fault. the story has almost no other facts in it about the RFO. there. i just read it for you. :

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

their insurance companies. Now we have people that can't think for themselves that NEED labels. It's much like the debate about trying to legislate common sense. Todd Crane > On Apr 13, 2016, at 6:25 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:57:42 -0700, Todd C

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

? Hell, with the amount of money we all pay them in annual fees, I can’t imagine it would be too hard for them to maintain. They could offer it as part of their public whois service or even just make raw data files public. Just a though —Todd signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: mpls switches

). -Todd > On Apr 6, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Mike wrote: > > Hi, > >Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco 3600X > series but the low density of 10g ports has me wanting to consider perhaps > others. I would love a minimum of 4 10g ports but of

Re: how to deal with port scan and brute force attack from AS 8075 ?

I must have missed that… my bad. > On Mar 31, 2016, at 2:01 AM, Dan Hollis wrote: > > It's right there in his email: > > "We have sent email to ab...@microsoft.com, but no answer." > > -Dan > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Todd Crane wrote: >

Re: how to deal with port scan and brute force attack from AS 8075 ?

Oh and, I’m assuming you contacted Microsoft’s abuse? If not, it’s not cool, not to mention unprofessional, to publicly call them out on such a public forum without giving them an opportunity to correct it first. > On Mar 31, 2016, at 1:15 AM, Todd Crane wrote: > > Marcel > &g

Re: how to deal with port scan and brute force attack from AS 8075 ?

government in Asia. This is configurable to various applications, timing schemes, and blocking/jailing mechanisms. -Todd > On Mar 31, 2016, at 1:02 AM, marcel.duregards--- via NANOG > wrote: > > Dear Nanog'er, > > We are facing a lot of port scan and brute force attac

Re: Cogent Communications

As a Cogent customer, I say ‘good luck’ Last time I called them on a Friday night, it was because they announcing (not originating but bad nevertheless) the IPv6 default route. The NOC “engineer” I spoke with adamantly insisted that there was nothing wrong with this. After about a half hour I g

Re: Oh dear, we've all been made redundant...

"Eliminates media stream buffering” Well, hell… my job is done here. [drops mic, walks out] > On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Found on Staple's website: > http://www.staples.com/NetReset-Automated-Power-Cycler-for-Modems-and-Routers/product_1985686 > > Fixes all issues, l

Re: Why the US Government has so many data centers

old machine that would otherwise be collecting dust to ensure that users can login to their computers despite conditions outside of our control is apparently akin to treason and should be dealt with accordingly. --Todd Sent from my iPad > On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:01 AM, George Metz wrote: &

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

> This is only tangentially related but it looks like HE has surpassed Cogent > on IPv4 adjacencies. That said the source probably suffers from a selection > bias at the very least. > > http://bgp.he.net/report/peers > > Hit reply by mistake instead of reply all. >

E911 (was CALEA Requirements)

While we're at it, can somebody point me on the right path for E911. I'm not looking for a managed service but rather an in-house solution. Todd Crane > On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > > --- lor...@hathcock.org wrote: > From: "Lorell

sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

commercial offerings for the "better" protocol) Todd Crane

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a clue. cheers, t On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie wrote: > They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :) > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> >> Todd Underwood wrote:

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data? T On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" wrote: > Anyone else aware of it? >

Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?

If we are still talking about Netflix issues, eventually many of the issues will sort themselves out. As more and more "smart" devices are IPv6 enabled, IPv4 only devices will become rarer and rarer. Thus the CGNAT pools will be shared by less and less accounts. Then again... we may run into the i

Re: Anonymous Threats

I’m pretty sure that is what TOR was designed to prevent. While your intent may be altruistic, technologically speaking, there is no difference between that and say Iran or China sniffing out traffic. > On Jan 10, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Eric Rogers wrote: > > Is there any way to sniff for that ty

Re: Binge On! - get your umbrellas out, stuff's hitting the fan.

At least Microsoft would get heat for unsolicited downloads. Why does Microsoft (allegedly) think they can download (unwanted or at least unsolicited) software to unsuspecting users computer, just to upsell them, at our expense? 20Gigs per household is a lot of data across a market. If it was m

Re: bad announcement taxonomy

Reorigination? Mis-re-origination? On Nov 18, 2015 22:53, "Randy Bush" wrote: > > What about "origin scrubbing". > > so now it has no origin? >

Re: Project Fi and the Great Firewall

Why not both? So sad when you have to choose a single oppressive regime to track your internet use. T On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, 09:04 Brandon Butterworth wrote: > > This is what roaming data means, Your data packet is simply trunked to > > your original operator to process. So you will be having

Re: spam smackdown?

luckily, many of us saw almost none of this spam due to effective inbound spam filtering on our accounts. which is awesome. i did, however, manage to see lots of messages from people complaining about the spam that they did receive. :-) t On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:

Re: /27 the new /24

all, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: >> it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes >> that serve these kinds of collections of people. >> > > this conve

Re: /27 the new /24

it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes that serve these kinds of collections of people. how much inter-ASN traffic is there generally for a city of 100k people, even if they all have 1Gb/s connections? are they all torrenting, accessing local business web pages that ar

Re: /27 the new /24

In general, most of NANOG recipients live in the populated metros and know very little about what it's like to try to provide internet access in the hinterlands. do not pay attention to there magical claims of 'just connect to some IX and everything will be fine'. you already know that that's not

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

that's crazy. why would you want a simple way to boostrap more addresses from what we have now? you'll never make yourself into an internationally known ipvNEXT advocate with engineering like that. more advocacy. less engineering! t On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

worked well and we had plenty of addresses. we still have plenty of addresses and although they're no longer ~free from quasi-governmental organizations they're way cheaper than the cost to implement v6. so we're still going to use v4 ~forever. > > So, please, Todd, ex

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

evers. Instead of a simple, practical matter of engineering a transition we got 15 years of advocacy. It makes the sleazy v4 transfer market look appealing. :) T On Oct 1, 2015 8:59 PM, "Owen DeLong" wrote: > I’m not at all tied up in a particular protocol. > > Still, Todd,

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

hack and should die already. It will take a few years for > router manufactures to get it right but them they do it will be better for > all. > > Regards, > > Dovid > > -Original Message- > From: Todd Underwood > Sender: "NANOG" Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 22

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

; If you want the end host on the other side to be able to send a reply > packet, then > it pretty much has to be able to somehow handle that 128 bit reply address > to set up the destination for the reply packet, no? (No such requirements > for ASN32). > > Seriously, Todd, thi

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

one interesting thing to note... On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:01 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > Some of us have been running IPv6 in production for over a decade > now and developing products that support IPv6 even longer. > > We have had 17 years to build up a universal IPv6 network. It > should have

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

harder but not impossible. We just chose badly for decades and now we have NAT *and* a dumb migration. Oh well. T On Oct 1, 2015 19:26, "Matthew Newton" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +, Todd Underwood wrote: > > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

i'm still confused, to be honest. why are we 'encouraging' 'evangelizing' or 'forcing' ipv6 adoption. it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i guess we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say

Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115

C-DBA related stuff on opera...@pch.net JT --- John Todd - jt...@pch.net - +1-415-831-3123 On 29 Sep 2015, at 8:05, Bob Evans wrote: Nice of you to check Jim. This brings up the old idea - A long time ago I had an INOC phone by PCH.NET - It never rang, as we filter our outbound with d

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

another good idea is to design a migration path to ipv6 so that people using hte internet can also use the ipv6-internet. that would be cool. we should probably think about some migration path other than the pretty obviously implausible "dual stack" silliness before this stuff actually becomes a

Re: Recent trouble with QUIC?

This has now been resolved. See recent post by ian swett in a separate thread about quic. T On Sep 24, 2015 1:12 AM, "Mike Meredith" wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:01:19 -0500, Sean Hunter > may have written: > > a) Has anyone here had a similar experience? Was the root cause QUIC > > in your

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

: Todd K Grand Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists? On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Todd K Grand wrote: The problem has been resolved. Thanks to everybody that contributed. And the issue was...? ~Marcin

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Mikrotik router-boards can be used as a serial to IP converter. Complete with rip, ospf, bgp, etc. -Original Message- From: White, Andrew Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:33 AM To: Frank Bulk ; 'Roland Dobbins' ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

The problem has been resolved. Thanks to everybody that contributed.

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

IPV6 Glue is gone. and no the domain is qkstream.com not gkstream.com The domain I have owned for 8 or so years. The problem started within the past 3-4 weeks. -Original Message- From: Todd K Grand Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:03 AM To: Tony Finch Cc: Steve Atkins ; nanog

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

Definitely something I need to address, I agree. However with that said the tgrand.com domain has the same problem yet hotmail/outlook.com sends fine to these. -Original Message- From: Tony Finch Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:57 AM To: Todd K Grand Cc: Steve Atkins ; nanog

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

Interesting, however those ipv6 addresses were dropped from our dns almost 2 weeks ago. No quad A records should exist anylonger, as it has been more than 48 hours. -Original Message- From: Tony Finch Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:24 AM To: Todd K Grand Cc: Steve Atkins ; nanog

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

When I send from outlook.com to qkstream.com packets never arrive from microsofts outbound ip addresses. Yet I can see the packets fine if I send from outlook.com to tgrand.com -Original Message- From: Nate Itkin Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:38 PM To: Todd K Grand Subject: Re

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

another email domain hosted on the same server is tgr...@tgrand.com. Hotmail/Outlook can send fine to this domain. -Original Message- From: Todd K Grand Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:19 PM To: Steve Atkins ; nanog list Subject: Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists? Content-Type

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

domain is. Todd shared the domain with me privately. The DNS configuration (and SMTP and TLS) looks fine, with nothing out of the ordinary, to me too. So the next thing to look at would be the rejection message. Cheers, Steve=

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

is an IDN, which Todd already said wasn't the case. At least I know Unicode domains didn't work on Exchange 2013 OWA, but worked when changed to ASCII. It may have changed by now though. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Mess

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

DNS has been confirmed to be valid. -Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 1:22 PM To: Todd K Grand Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists? On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:49:30 -0500, "Todd K Grand" said: Th

outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

valid. This happens without ever sending a packet to our servers. The affected domain can send emails to hotmail/outlook accounts just fine. Anybody have some recommendations on how I resolve this, as Microsoft support seems to be under technical. Thanks, Todd K. Grand

Re: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS?

We call all relax. The Commander-in-Chief of the USA has declared this to be a technical glitch, and not a security breach or attack. -- Todd Williams Network Engineer Tactical Network Operations Rackspace Hosting On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:45:55PM +, Klimakhin, Kirill wrote: > This

  1   2   3   >