let me try to be more concrete and helpful: lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list. none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c there are no facts in evidence yet.
if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a clue. cheers, t On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com> wrote: > They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :) > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: >> >> Todd Underwood wrote: >> > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data? >> >> are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list? >> >> Nick >> >> > T >> > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <f...@web2objects.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Anyone else aware of it? >> >> >> >
