On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 10:08 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>>
>> I just want to say happy xmas to everyone at NANOG.
>>
>> I'm about to sign off for the holidays.
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>
> enjoy
I just want to say happy xmas to everyone at NANOG.
I'm about to sign off for the holidays.
Andrew
w bundling Nmap with
malware!]
On 12/6/2011 13:30, andrew.wallace wrote:
> It could be argued that Nmap is malware, and such software has already been
> called to be made illegal.
>
> If I was Cnet, I would stop distributing his software altogether.
>
> Link: http://nmap.org/boo
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:48 PM, wrote:
> On the other hand, just being Fyodor is sufficient to get him taken seriously.
It could be argued that Nmap is malware, and such software has already been
called to be made illegal.
If I was Cnet, I would stop distributing his software altogether.
Link
Using fruitful language and acting like a child isn't going to see you taken
seriously.
Andrew
> - Forwarded message from Fyodor -
> F*ck them! If anyone knows a great copyright attorney in the U.S.,
> please send me the details or ask them to get in touch with me.
>
> Also, shame on M
Before we see knee-jerk conclusions about who to blame, these attacks could be
carried out by anyone.
Is country even relevant in the cyberscape?
Andrew
From: Leland Vandervort
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: Leland Vandervort
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 201
I expect to see Joe Bloggs arrested next week then, it won't happen though.
Andrew
From: Jared Mauch
To: andrew.wallace
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Water Utility SCADA 'Attack': T
These reports are ment for private sector eyes only. I suggest new secrecy
legislation, for fusion centres.
Andrew
From: Jared Mauch
To: andrew.wallace
Cc: Jay Ashworth ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 8:14 PM
Subject:
My comment about a certain person leaking public-private sector correspondence
to the media still applies then.
https://plus.google.com/114359738470992181937/posts/DSnJfKqrJK1
Andrew
From: Jay Ashworth
To: NANOG
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 3:14 AM
S
"There is no evidence to support claims made in initial reports -- which were
based on raw, unconfirmed data and subsequently leaked to the
media."
http://jeffreycarr.blogspot.com/2011/11/latest-fbi-statement-on-alleged.html
From what I'm seeing and
hearing is the report by the fusion centr
Here is the latest folks,
"DHS and the FBI have found no evidence of a cyber intrusion into the SCADA
system in Springfield, Illinois."
http://jeffreycarr.blogspot.com/2011/11/latest-fbi-statement-on-alleged.html
Andrew
If NSA had no signals information prior to the attack, this should be a wake up
call for the industry.
Andrew
From: Jay Ashworth
To: NANOG
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:32 PM
Subject: First real-world SCADA attack in US
On an Illinois water utility:
Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look at this
perhaps being sabotage.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20119163-266/blackberry-service-issues-spread-to-u.s-and-canada/
Andrew
From: Frank Bulk
To: outa...@outages.org
Sent: Tues
Sad day for all concerned in the tech industry. RIP
Andrew
From: Alex Rubenstein
To: 'NANOG list'
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 1:15 AM
Subject: Steve Jobs has died
Not entirely on-list-topic, but still relevant.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-2011633
I'm hearing on the news wire 80mph winds will come to UK over the next 72 hours.
Andrew
It looks like the DHS, FEMA got this emergency wrong... by the time it got to
NYC it was the equivalent of a normal day in Scotland.I live in Scotland...
Andrew
World day is a sure-shot bet win at an anti-climax, and an industry
failure and waste of investment and publicity campaign.
Andrew
A tsunami warning is issued for north-eastern Japan after an earthquake with a
magnitude of 7.4 hits the region.
Andrew
Someone has recently post to a mailing list:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-April/080096.html
Andrew
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:
>> travels in general at approx 970 kph (600 mph)
>
> True in the deepest parts of open ocean - upon reaching the shore-line
> it'll be travelling a lot slower.
You guys forget a lot of folks on the list are working on cabling ships and off
s
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
> *yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
Remember a wall of tsunami water travels in general at approx 970 kph (600
mph), think about it.
More information from http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/
Andrew
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jeff Aitken wrote:
> What's to be surprised about?
This isn't the rhetoric of a super power, more like one of a university campus.
To think these guys have built a cyber command with war waging capabilities,
and allegedly capable of building nuclear worms such
These "coronal mass ejections" will slam into the Earth's magnetic shield.
The biggest flares can disrupt technology, including power grids,
communications systems and satellites.
"Our current view is that the effect of the solar flare is likely to
reach Earth later today (Thursday GMT), possib
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:11 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:49:36 EST, Josh Smith said:
>
>> even if it was I suspect any service available via satellite might
>> suffer from similar problems if the methods used to disrupt
>> connectivity in Egypt were employed here.
>
> The real question isn
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:20 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
>>
>>> Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of
>>> using its netwo
We should be asking the Egyptians to stagger the return of services so that
infrastructure isn't affected, when connectivity is deemed to be allowed to
come back online.
Andrew Wallace
---
British IT Security Consultant
This is what I was seeing too.
- Original Message -
From:Andre Gironda
To:"nanog@nanog.org"
Cc:andrew.wallace
Sent:Thursday, 16 December 2010, 21:39:24
Subject:Re: Facebook issue
It's returning an empty set of html tags
Anyone having issue with Facebook?
Andrew
Thenextweb have been quick to push out speculation -
http://thenextweb.com/uk/2010/12/12/amazon-co-uk-and-de-are-down-is-anonymous-to-blame/
Andrew
- Original Message -
From:Wil Schultz
To:North American Network Operators Group
Cc:
Sent:Sunday, 12 December 2010, 21:33:29
Subject:Amaz
Like I said the other day on Cnet comments section, December 10, 2010 3:31 PM
PST.
"It is extremely easy to find out who everyone is, because the
"anonymous" is decentralised and easy to infiltrate and manipulate."
Andrew
From: Leo Bicknell
To: North American Network Operators Group
Cc:
I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous".
http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanonymous-press-release/
Also:
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html
Andrew
From: Stefan Fouant
To: 'Marshall Eubanks' ; 'North American Networ
time is a pretty serious
deterrent ;). I'm sure the bot-masters are quaking in their boots... :)
- Original Message -
From: andrew.wallace
To: Michael Smith
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu Dec 09 18:14:16 2010
Subject: Re: Mastercard problems
It was a quick arrest wasn't it?
--
It was a quick arrest wasn't it?
- Original Message -
From:Michael Smith
To:andrew.wallace
Cc:
Sent:Thursday, 9 December 2010, 21:49:16
Subject:RE: Mastercard problems
1 down, 3896 to go... :)
-Original Message-
From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wall...@rocketmai
ml
Andrew
- Original Message -
From:James Downs
To:andrew.wallace
Cc:Christopher Morrow ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent:Wednesday, 8 December 2010, 21:30:20
Subject:Re: Mastercard problems
On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:30 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> I would say the attack falls un
I would say the attack falls under the jurisdiction of the US secret service
since this is an attack on the financial system.
"Today the agency's primary investigative mission is to safeguard the payment
and financial systems of the United States." --- secretservice.gov
Andrew
- Original
Washington (CNN) -- U.S. officials at the Pentagon and State Department denied
Friday knowing of any efforts to take down the WikiLeaks website or asking
companies to do so.
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/12/03/wikileaks.takedown/index.html
Andrew
Hi Nanog,
Some more information here -
http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/ecwnn/wikileaks_hacked_ahead_of_secret_us_document/c176lcb
The hacker has featured previously in a news article on his attack platform -
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/3258-Hacker-Releases-Second-Video-of-E
Issue is corrected, apologies.
- Original Message
From: andrew.wallace
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 14 October, 2010 11:53:13
Subject: Google groups outage
500 server error for a long time.
http://groups.google.com/
Andrew
Completely down again (UK).
Up in United Kingdom.
Andrew
- Original Message
From: Harry Strongburg
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 23 September, 2010 21:08:48
Subject: Re: Facebook Issues/Outage in Southeast?
It's up for me in the North-East. Should be back now, I hope.
Over the last 30 minutes or more (UK)
Andrew
- Original Message
From: Ernie Rubi
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 23 September, 2010 20:39:15
Subject: Facebook Issues/Outage in Southeast?
Anyone else having trouble? We're colo'ed at the NOTA in Miami and directly
peer
with them - eve
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com (andrew.wallace) wrote:
>
>> A British computer expert has been entrusted with part of a digital key, to
>>help
>> restart the internet in the event of a major catastrophe.
>>
>
A British computer expert has been entrusted with part of a digital key, to
help
restart the internet in the event of a major catastrophe.
Paul Kane talked to Eddie Mair on Radio 4's PM programme about what he might be
called upon to do in the event of an international online emergency.
ht
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Tarig Yassin wrote:
> I would like to issue a question here, who controls this Internet?
The truth to your question is, anybody who wants to. Hackers, activists,
governments, terrorists all have the ability to control it. But probably not
all
at the same time.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Roy wrote:
> On 7/24/2010 2:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> It does indeed seem to be tool/net.kook day here on NANOG. I didn't check
>> to see if there is supposed to be a full moon tonight.
>>
>> jms
>>
>>
>
> Close! Full Moon on 25 July 2010 at
n3td3v Security is monitoring the situation between North Korea, US and South
Korea.
North Korea has already threatened to use its nuclear arms when the "wargames"
begin Sunday by United States and South Korea, but n3td3v Security predicts
North Korea is planning a large scale cyber attack on U
Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704545004575352983850463108.html
My opinion:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704545004575352983850463108.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments%26commentId%3D1330685
Andrew
http://sites.google.com/site/n3td3v/
Why hasn't Gadi left a comment on the article?
Andrew
- Original Message
From: Randy Bush
To: andrew.wallace
Cc: Jeroen van Aart ; nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 1 July, 2010 23:01:02
Subject: Re: The Economist, cyber war issue
> There is a part 2 as well
and this is a
There is a part 2 as well
http://www.economist.com/node/16478792?story_id=16478792
Andrew
- Original Message
From: Jeroen van Aart
To: NANOG list
Sent: Thu, 1 July, 2010 19:57:08
Subject: Re: The Economist, cyber war issue
andrew.wallace wrote:
> Article: http://www.economist.
Article: http://www.economist.com/node/16481504?story_id=16481504
My opinion: http://www.economist.com/comment/586099#comment-586099
Andrew
http://sites.google.com/site/n3td3v/
- Original Message
From: Gadi Evron
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 1 July, 2010 14:25:04
Subject: The Econo
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> Cyber Threats Yes, But Is It Cyber War?
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100609_cyber_threats_yes_but_is_it_cyberwar/
>
> -J
Cyber war is something made up by the security industry to save it from going
bankrupt because the traditional pro
The original article is FUD. The Times newspaper is historically known as MI5,
MI6's newspaper of choice.
Andrew
http://sites.google.com/site/n3td3v/
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:17 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 2010-05-27 10:42, andrew.wallace wrote:
>>
>> Look at it from an attackers point of view. If you're thinking about
>> carrying out an electronic jihad of some kind when is the best time?
>> A normal wo
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:23 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:42:37 PDT, "andrew.wallace" said:
>> Look at it from an attackers point of view. If you're thinking about carrying
>> out an electronic jihad of some kind when is the best time? A normal working
>&g
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>> Internet and phone connections across Britain could go into meltdown
>> as BT workers threaten their first national strike for 23 years...
>>
>> ‘Many business and residential phonelines could go out of action, and
>> if broadband crashes the
Internet and phone connections across Britain could go into meltdown as BT
workers threaten their first national strike for 23 years...
‘Many business and residential phonelines could go out of action, and if
broadband crashes then thousands and thousands of people will find their
internet goes
--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Gadi Evron wrote:
> A socio-psychological analysis of the first internet war (Estonia)
There has been no cyber war yet.
Estonia was not a cyber war.
You've got it fundamentally wrong on the world stage infront of everyone.
Andrew
--- On Sun, 21/2/10, Larry Brower wrote:
> From: Larry Brower
> Subject: Re: CNN Cyber Shockwave only available in US
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Sunday, 21 February, 2010, 1:29
> andrew.wallace wrote:
> Funsec perhaps, but not here
Yo
It is not being broadcast world wide...
Provide links.
Andrew
I am from the UK and don't know how to watch CNN Cyber Shockwave via an
internet live stream.
The programme starts 8PM ET, 1AM UK.
What do I do?
Andrew
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Michael Painter wrote:
> From: Michael Painter
> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 22:18
> andrew.wallace wrote:
> > It looks like this demo is pressing ahead for the
> intr
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush wrote:
> From: Randy Bush
> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 21:58
> > It looks like this demo is
>
> a bunch of sick press an
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush wrote:
> From: Randy Bush
> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 3:10
> the details were in the press days
> ago. 83.2% scare, ne
US carried out "Cyber Shockwave" - an exercise by non-government actors who
have close relations to the government past.
The results will be aired on CNN this weekend.
Intelligence suggests the scenario was not standard and that a crash in the
smart phone network was used as a concept of how US
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> You apparently fail to understand that making other people's research well
> known in the community is an important role. Would we be more secure, or
> less secure, if somebody did the research, but then nobody told the owners
> of all that Cisco gear ab
- Original Message
From: Brian Keefer
To: NANOG list
Cc: a.harrow...@gmail.com; andrew.wallace
Sent: Fri, 5 February, 2010 1:55:58
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Security consul
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, wrote:
> -original message-
> Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
> recommendations
> From: "andrew.wallace"
> Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> &
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
> associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
> and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without
> authorization. I’ll iden
-- Forwarded message --
From: andrew.wallace
Date: Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Skiddy Interview
To: Adrian Crenshaw
Cc: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Adrian Crenshaw wrote:
> Kind of interesting Ski
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Bruce Williams
wrote:
> Mark Rasch, former head of the Department of Justice computer crime
> unit, called the attacks “cyberwarfare,” and said it was clearly an
> escalation of a digital conflict between China and the U.S.
>
> As if the old threat models weren't b
Hey Marcus, you got what you wanted pal
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU), cyber security ramped up
as a
national security agenda item.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10436018-265.html
Congrats,
Andrew
And here is the direct link for anyone who's interested:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2010-January/072340.html
- Original Message
From: Brian Keefer
To: NANOG list
Sent: Sun, 10 January, 2010 2:59:50
Subject: JunOS remote DoS code has been posted to FD
I haven't
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> (again, this seems really off topic, but)
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:33 PM, andrew.wallace
> wrote:
>> though Gadi is Israeli and Marcus Sachs Pakistani and couldn't be
>
> marcus is pakistani?
>
>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:42:18 CST, Jorge Amodio said:
>>> http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/12/22/introducing-new-cybersecurity-
>>> coordinat
Hi,
Read my post one more time and think though: Only "zf0" are legally in the shit.
The guy "Dragos Ruiu" has absolutely no case against me.
Copy & paste doesn't count as defamation, speak to Wired's legal team
if you have an issue.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Richard A St
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> at the risk of adding to the metadiscussion. what does any of this have to
> do with nanog?
> (sorry I'm kinda irritable about character slander being spammed out
> unnecessarily to unrelated public lists lately ;-P )
>
What does this have to
--- On Wed, 7/29/09, Scott Weeks wrote:
> From: Scott Weeks
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Dan Kaminsky
> To: "andrew.wallace"
> Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 10:10 PM
>
>
> --- andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
> wrote:
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: andrew.wallace
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:22 PM
Subject: Real Black Hats Hack Security Experts on Eve of Conference
To: Information Security Mailing List
LAS VEGAS — Two noted security professionals were targeted this week
by hackers who broke
Big up the Nanog community, you do the net proud...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8163190.stm
Why are you alining yourself with a computer hacker? I thought you
were trying to stop these guys releasing exploits in your line of
work?
Andrew
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> This is one of them mysterious and rare cases where a non router OS
> vulnerability may affect ne
trick.
>
> --
> Steve
>
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Chaim Rieger wrote:
>
>> And I want cnet to not report this crap.
>>
>> They glamorise it.
>> --Original Message--
>> From: andrew.wallace
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> To: n3td3v
>
t report this crap.
>
> They glamorise it.
> --Original Message--
> From: andrew.wallace
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> To: n3td3v
> Subject: Re: Michael Mooney releases another worm: Law Enforcement /
> Intelligence Agency's do nothing
> Sent: Apr 17, 2009 18:38
So if Al-Qaeda blow up a shopping centre and the guy who masterminded
it turns out to be 17 he gets a job in MI5?
OH MY GOD.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> andrew.wallace wrote:
>>
>> I want this individual made an example of and im not joking.
>>
by n3td3v April 17, 2009 5:43 PM PDT
"The teenager who takes credit for the worms that hit Twitter earlier
this week has been hired by a Web application development firm and on
Friday released a fifth worm on the microblogging site, he said."
I hope the FBI nip him in the bud, this cannot contin
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
> Anyone seeing phishing alerts for senders in this thread?
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3080/3243440012_d1f6f1e5e7_o.png
>
> -Chris
Yes.
87 matches
Mail list logo
