Hi!
On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:32 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." wrote:
> By end user I mean hosting clients (cloud, collocation, shared, dedicated,
> VPS, etc.) of any sort. For example you have clients that would needsay
> /24 for their dedicated server. If you charge a $1.00/IP which is typical
Hi,
On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:22 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." wrote:
> Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
>
> Just wondering, with so many IPv6 resources in a single allocation it
> would seem difficult to charge anything at all.
>
> 1. How are you making up loss of revenue on IPv4 assi
Hi,
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Eric Germann wrote:
> Well, I did when I checked them shortly after I saw the log messages.
>
> Wondering now if the routes for those bounced and in the "middle" of the
> bounce, they're considered martian.
Yes, that sounds reasonable. Anything that is retur
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Eric Germann wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm trying to understand why a Vyatta 6.4 collection of routers is carping
> about the following as martian routes:
>
> 113.107.174.14
> 27.73.1.159
> 94.248.215.60
> 95.26.105.161
>
> They don't look like they fall in the traditio
Hi,
On 3/8/2012 5:40 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
Just got an email today to our account associated with our legacy ARIN address space. A firm
"Precision Management of Texas" is interested in subleasing some of our IP space for
"on-demand solutions for brand marketers and website promotion chiefly
hi,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Nicolai wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:20:07PM -0500, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
>> Assuming it is not a futile/wasted effort, where is the current best
>> place/resource to report an active botnet C&C to?
>
> I don't know if there's a single best option, but there a
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:22:53 -0400
Chris wrote:
> > McColo and Atrivo were disconnected for much larger sins than
> > spamming someone's wordpress blog.
>
> Many of you do not understand the scope of "just spamming a Wordpress
> blog".
I do understand the scope of shady SEO companies.
> This i
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:47:03 -0400
Chris wrote:
> For folks who do not understand, I'm trying to "McColo" XSServer so
> their lack of response in regards to abuse is gone rather than the
> suggestions of scripting (guess you didn't read the full text of the
> email) or you pushing a product on me
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
"Brian R. Watters" wrote:
> We are looking for a SORBS contact as their web site and registration
> process is less than friendly if somehow you get listed by them.
As I recall it, you can manually create an account on their
request-tracker instance and
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST)
Tim Franklin wrote:
> > Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
>
> Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other
> anti-spam?
>
> I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to
> nanog@nanog.org :(
>
Ditto. G
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:32 -0700
Landon Stewart wrote:
> Lets say you had a file that was 1,000,000,000 characters consisting
> of 8,000,000,000bits. What if instead of transferring that file
> through the interwebs you transmitted a mathematical equation to tell
> a computer on the other end
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:22:03 -0400
Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Scott Brim
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:42, Leigh Porter
> > wrote:
> >> So are they basing this on you downloading it or on making it
> >> available for others?
> >
> > Without knowing t
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:12:57 -0400
"Thomas York" wrote:
> At my current place of business, we have several manufacturing plants
> in China as well as the United States. All of the plants have an OVPN
> tunnel to a datacenter here in Indianapolis which connect all of the
> plants. Our China plants
On Mon, 9 May 2011 17:14:06 -0400
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, May 09, 2011 04:45:36 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Depends on what he is doing. BSDs tend to be far more mature than
> > any Linux. They are poor systems for desktops or anything like
> > that. They are heavily used as servers by man
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700
Dan Dill wrote:
> http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
>
> Seems like it wouldn't be hard to track down that information...
Can you identify where on that page it lists a contact for the IT
department of the Panama City government?
I can't, because it doe
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:18:30 -0700
Wil Schultz wrote:
> I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of
> testing ipv6 out.
>
> A couple of concerns that come to mind are:
>
> 1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same
> content. Typical SEO standards are
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
goe...@anime.net wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> > Why o why are isp's and hosters so ignorant in dealing with such
> > issues and act like they do not care?
>
> they don't act like they do not care. they really *don't* care. no
>
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:34:11 +0100
Alfa Telecom wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 03:25 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Alfa Telecom wrote:
> >
> >> Both ranges are from RIPE region and couldn't be announced from
> >> ARIN ASN at all.
> >
> > Your premise is incorrect. Any block from any RI
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:03:18 -0500
Leon Kaiser wrote:
> This is the man who poisoned DroneBL. He is a bad man. Keep your
> children safe.
> http://raged.tittybang.org/
How, exactly, has kunwon1 poisoned DroneBL when he has had no RPC key
for over a year?
William
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:25:23 + (GMT)
Tim Franklin wrote:
> > I do not live over there, I have never seen a Vonage or Magic jack
> > or any other VoIP service ad on TV in the UK, ever.
>
> Vonage *are* advertising on UK TV. Hardly the carpet-bombing the OP
> suggests is the case in the
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:41:57 -0800
Kate Gerry wrote:
> We've been advised by a client that they're incorrectly listing
> a /15. The listing is:
>
> (E-431420) 96.44.0.0/15
>
> According to their FAQ they only take delistings via newsgroups and
> Google News isn't co-operating with me in re
Hi,
Could an nLayer network engineer contact me offlist regarding a service
or core router at I'm guessing One Wilshire that is having serious
problems?
Thanks.
William
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:12:40 -0600
"Aaron Wendel" wrote:
> How can someone steal something from you that you don’t own?
>
>
Legacy space. The best example I can think of was Choopa's hijacking
of Erie Forge and Steel's legacy space. In this case, it was theft as
it was a legacy allocatio
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:55 +1300 (FJST)
Franck Martin wrote:
> Any relation?
>
> http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
No, that has to do with wireless users, not DSL. Wireless is an
entirely different part of the Verizon empire.
William
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:45:40 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to extend a special thanks to one of the Spamhaus team
> members for reaching out to me and offering dialogue on this matter.
> He was quite polite and understanding of the situation and we came to
> terms on wha
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:34:49 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> We were offering a privacy protected domain registration service at
> one point which we have since discontinued for obvious reasons.
Ah yes! That *was* you guys.
Did you know that you're still being recommended on 4chan /b/ for
no-quest
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:38:54 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> It's a problem with PCCW not accepting the tags, we've had this issue
> with them occasionally and will need to address it with them directly.
> The machine itself has also been shut down so there should not be any
> further heartache.
$ w
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:28:55 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> Rhetorical question. Probably PCCW isn't accepting the null routes.
> Why not blacklist them for having messed up communities?
Why not actually nullroute the IPs instead of depending on BGP tagging?
Again: "ip route 208.64.120.197 255.255.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:23:17 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:21 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:55 -0500
> > Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> >
> >> Raymond,
> >>
> >> I
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:55 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> Raymond,
>
> I do not take you for a fool, the assignment is legitimately null
> routed. My traceroutes are dropping at my home ISP.
I call bollocks. It's alive and kicking via BGP here.
edge1.lax01# show ip bgp 208.64.120.197/32
B
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:42:22 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I fat fingered the netmask, try now.
$ wget -S www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl
--2011-01-17 19:07:59-- http://www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl/
Resolving www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl... 208.64.120.197
Connecting to www.vertrouwdeapotheek.nl|208.64.120.19
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:21:19 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> William,
>
> It depends, we have criteria. You can't just e-mail
> ab...@blacklotus.net and expect any given web site to be immediately
> shut down. There is due process and we need to make a decision on the
> matter and serve it to o
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:13:16 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I'm getting 72.215.225.9 for that host.
The nameservers just changed to ns2/ns4.codiz.net.
ns2 is a bogon, the real deal is ns4 hosted at corbina.ru, which has an
abuse@ that goes to /dev/null so whatever.
Man. Hosting Y
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:11:37 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> William,
>
> You're quite right, we don't. We presume that our customers are
> honorable until proven otherwise. We're a legitimate U.S. based
> corporation and we make ourselves available to the pertinent RBL's and
> authorities as a
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:54:37 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> William,
>
> Our company is primarily focused on the filtering of DDoS traffic. A
> significant amount of our IP space is routed elsewhere via proxy or
> GRE. If a customer pollutes, they pollute and thats their own
> business. If the
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:35:22 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> William,
>
> I'm not certain that any Black Lotus IP's are even connected to EFnet.
Maybe not presently, but your company has a history in the IRC
community. And it's not a history I would define as "good."
A history of selling "protect
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:09:07 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> That's fine, but the listings don't even make sense. There is no
> evidence in the listing and i'm still trying to figure out a) why they
> think that these new listings have anything to do with the ones we
> already cleaned and b) whi
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:49:15 -0500
Richard Barnes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What IPv6 prefix lengths are people accepting in BGP from
> peers/customers? My employer just got a /48 allocation from ARIN, and
> we're trying to figure out how to support multiple end sites out of
> this (probably ar
Hi,
I am wondering why it seems that many ISPs still do not do packet
source verification in 2010? Just last night I had to deal with a DoS
attack that would have been impossible if more ISPs did packet source
verification.
I mean, it's 2010. We can do IP-level ACLs in hardware on most of the
c
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:34 +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 9/12/10 8:04 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
> >> The problem is that they were also slashdotted. The logs would also have a
> >> large number of unrelated.
> >
> > pro-tip: the tool
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:58 -0500, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> I really want to move all newly installed internal and customer racks
> over to all 208v power instead of 120v. As far as I can remember, I
> can't remember any server/switch/router or any other equipment that
> didn't run on 208v AC.
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:02 -0500, Bret Clark wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 07:55 PM, Ren Provo wrote:
> > http://blog.comcast.com/2010/11/comcast-comments-on-level-3.html
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> >
> >
> Okay's let's say L3 gives in to Comcast and pays them.
L3
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:07 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in
> place.
They used to host thepiratebay. I would figure that site probably got a
lot of ddos attacks...
William
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station.
Wikileaks gets DDoSed all the time. My understanding is that PRQ
nullrouted the IP because the DDoS is much larger this time.
William
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:06 +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris wrote:
>
> > If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
>
> When does it become a meal and, more importantly, do you want to
> supper (sic) size?
>
The supersize option offered
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:39 -0500, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
> Can anyone explain why ATT's UVerse adds significant delay to packets
> compared to their ADSL service?
U-Verse is actually the name of two entirely different services - VDSL
and FTTP. This is a typical symptom of stupidity on behalf
Hi,
Have you checked the IronPort reputation scores for your mailserver IPs?
Google uses this data as part of it's spam detection method.
William
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:15 -0400, Erik L wrote:
> I realize that this is somewhat OT, but I'm sure that others on the list
> encounter the same issu
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 16:29 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Brad Fleming wrote:
>
> > Any Road Runner abuse reps on the list?
>
> http://postmaster.rr.com/ is a good place to start.
Quoting that website:
| The Postmaster team is part of the Road Runner Mail Operations
| te
Vyatta's commercial products (the bundles with OS+Hardware) come with adequate
support in my experience.
William
(Sorry for topposting. The android email experience is depressingly lacking.)
Andrew Kirch wrote:
> On 8/23/2010 1:17 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> What it really comes down to is p
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 18:49 +, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Isn't this a little bit like an SSL daemon?
no.
> One which refuses to process a revocation list on the basis of the
> function of the certificate is useless.
no, it's not. ssl as a form of identity assurance itself is what is
usel
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:25 +, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> it is:
>
> c) RIAA/MPAA members trying to make ISPs liable for what customers do in
> order to somehow fork the isp into kicking out the customer, as they
> refuse to simply go to court against the customer but rather prefer to
> ha
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:29 +, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> hmm funny, it had the piratebay on it,
if you think that is a good sales point... do you actually have any
legitimate customers?
william
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 14:42 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> But I do take your point about .co/.com, and in all fairness, it is a
> decade delayed favor returned by NeuStar to Verisign for the .bz/.biz
> "collaborative marketing" ploy of 2001.
Or eNom's .cc/.com ploy from 1999-present. D
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:50 -0400, Steven King wrote:
> I am very curious to see how this would play with networks that
> wouldn't support such a technology. How would you ensure communication
> between a network that supported 33-Bit addressing and one that doesn't?
33-bit is a fucking retarded c
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 19:16 +, Andy Davidson wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
>
> > Mark Schouten wrote:
> >> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
> >> Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
> > wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope y
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:42 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS s
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
> based service)[1].
>
> I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
> the smallest allocations from each pr
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:57 -0400, Steven Fischer wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with the Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10-gig
> switch that they'd be willing to share? How does it perform? How reliable
> is it? My experiences with the Dell switches have been less than favorable
> to th
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:07 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 11:01, Sandone, Nick wrote:
> > I would also add Brocade/Foundry to the mix as well. We've been deploying
> > these switches with great results. Since the IOS is very similar to
> > Cisco's, the transition has been quite eas
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:35 -0700, Tom wrote:
> In connecting to the conference network, I noticed this on the Westin
> wireless:
>
> ath0: no link . got link
> DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
> DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
> DHCPNAK from 1.2.1.3
> DH
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 23:40 -0700, jacob miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
They mean "use an operating system not made by crackheads." There's a
reason why SCO switched from UNIX sales to Intellectual Property
trolling after all.
William
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:27 -0400, Brad Beck wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been working diligently to improve performance of interactive
> applications (Citrix, terminal) that are run by users in our office
> located in Anchorage, and are served by a managed Internet connection
> provided by GCI. O
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 14:12 -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> Like many people, I can't justify the expense of "commercial" IP
> connectivity for my residence. As a result, I deal with dynamic IP
> addresses; dns issues; and limitations on the services that I can host
> at my residence. It just struck
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:23 -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 4/29/2010 21:05, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:48 -0400, David Krider wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> >>> Surely even at DeVry they teach t
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:48 -0400, David Krider wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > Surely even at DeVry they teach that if you refuse to hand over
> > passwords for property that is not legally yours, that you are
> > committing a crime. I
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:11 -0500, Olsen, Jason wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised that after the furor here on NANOG when the story
> first broke (in 2008) that there's been no discussion about the recent
> outcome of his trial (convicted, one count of felony network tampering).
Surely even at DeVry th
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:54 -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of
> > the v6 internet
>
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
DHCPv6 solv
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 15:07 -0500, Dennis Burgess wrote:
> I have a customer that has an IP of 12.43.95.126. Currently, I can not
> get any reverse on this IP.
>
>
>
> What is the best way to find out the responciable servers for this?
> Thanx in advance.
>
neno...@petrie:~$ dig -x 12.43.95
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 07:09 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> On 4/12/2010 2:49 AM, Alex Kamiru wrote:
> > I am in the process of sourcing for a carrier class email security
> > solution that will replace our current edge spam gateways based on open
> > source solutions. Some solutions that am currently
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Would someone from Google kindly confirm/deny this claim? I'm as patient
> as any other, but I'm beginning to feel for those who have yet (but are
> ready to) to trigger the filters...
>
> Thankfully, my 'reasonable' regex knowledge has me
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 15:31 -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:22 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:09 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct)
> > > wrote:
> > >> Was looking at the ARIN IP6 policy and cannot find any reference to those
> > >> who have
> > >> IP4 le
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 22:12 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
> On 3/20/10 8:37 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
> > That is not what I mean and you know it.
>
> What do you mean than? Hank made a good point on the type of traffic
> normally going through these groups.
My point hasn't
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 20:30 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
> >> An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
> >> trusted communities without leaks.
&g
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
> An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
> trusted communities without leaks.
Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:52 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
>
> I might argue the "few" comment, but I think it's better not t
Hello,
Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?
"Guillaume FORTAINE" wrote:
>Misses, Misters,
>
>I would want to inform you that the security of the Internet, that is
>discussed in the NSP-SEC mailing-list [0] by a selected group of vendors
>(Cisco, Juniper &
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 07:53 +, gordon b slater wrote:
> Hmm, the "hey! it's open source!" factor doesn't hold much sway in the
> network world, no-one will be amazed at that. Many observers are
> surprised at the amount of free software employed by ISPs and the
> like, but it's certainly no new
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 22:52 -0800, Nathan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm hoping to alleviate the "what's going on!?" type messages here this time.
> :)
>
Any IPs we can ping and get a response back from to verify everything is
ok? 1.2.3.4 isn't pingable, for example. :(
William
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 19:30 +, gordon b slater wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:17 -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > The syslog message sent to the local unix socket (/dev/log
> > or /dev/syslog) may contain a timestamp, in which case, that timestamp
> > may be used inst
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:29 -0700, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> Isn't the timestamps inserted by syslog rather then the reporting
> program itself?
The syslog message sent to the local unix socket (/dev/log
or /dev/syslog) may contain a timestamp, in which case, that timestamp
may be used instead of th
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:21 +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Last week Czech researchers released information on a new worm which
> exploits CPE devices (broadband routers) by means such as default
> passwords, constructing a large DDoS botnet. Today this story hit
> international news.
>
What makes
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 13:05 -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> Lots of people roll FreeBSD with Quagga/pf/ipfw for dual stack. See
> the freebsd-isp list.
FreeBSD's network stack chokes up in DDoS attacks due to interrupt
flooding. We used to use FreeBSD for firewalling and basic routing, but
whe
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:12 -0700, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro?
> Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall
> Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not
> looking
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 09:56 -0800, Gerald Wluka wrote:
>
> I am new to this mailing list - this should be a response to an already
> started thread that I cannot see:
>
Welcome to NANOG!
>
>
> IntelliguardIT has a new class of network appliance that installs inline
> (layer 2 appliance)
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 22:16 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Bruce Williams wrote:
>
> > The problem with IE is the same problem as Windows, the basic design
> > is fundementally insecure and "timely updates" can't fix that.
>
> You do realize, of course, that IE is r
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:30 -0600, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
> http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
>
> Please let me know if you have a different experience currently.
It is up here.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message,
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 01:47 -0600, James Hess wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> > DDoS attacks are attacks against capacity and/or state. Start reducing
>
> DDoS, by its very nature is a type of attack tha
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:24 -0500, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> > In the most basic terms, a stateful firewall performs bidirectional
> > classification of communications between nodes, and makes a pass/fail
> > determination on each packet based on a)
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 23:25 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
>
> > It "worked" against Indymedia UK: http://www.indymedia.org/fbi/
>
> indymedia is in texas, no mlat required.
It was an MLAT initiated
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> >
> > Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
> > It continues to exist right up until either (a) one party ch
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:55 +, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> thing is that it's illegal to maintain a database with "personal details"
> which ip addresses according to various german courts are (don't ask..
> mmk? ;) ofcourse we all know ip addresses identify nodes on a network, not
> perso
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:12 -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:57 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know of a webservice that converts a given IP into the
> > public CIDR range that belongs to? I am devel
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:10 -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Current RIR whois actually does that.
>
> ie: search for 199.4.29
> it will show you 199.4.28/22
Yes, but it has to be parsed, and RIRs have varying whois formats. ARIN
vs RIPE whois output, for example.
William
Hi,
Does anyone know of a webservice that converts a given IP into the
public CIDR range that belongs to? I am developing a tool where IP to
CIDR conversion based on RIR whois data would be useful for implementing
filtersets.
William
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:32 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Read the last paragraph again.. "will be submitted for delisting" .. not
> "has been delisted and it will take 3-5 hours to propagate"... I have to
> process all removals manually after the robot because the robot does get
> it wrong,
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 18:02 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> > Seth Mattinen wrote:
> >>
> >> You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was
> >> always under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or
> >> you are moved to the back of
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +, John Levine wrote:
> >ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
> >Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
> >involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>
> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal G
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:25 -0800, Alex Lanstein wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> >>>Cernal and Atrivo are two different entities, Atrivo used to host
> >>>Cernal, but now they have different hosting arrangements.
>
> I now understand the original point you wer
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 09:55 -0800, Alex Lanstein wrote:
> >>>Also, the fact that Atrivo is *dead* and this
> >>>stuff is still listed means that anyone who gets
> >>>those blocks from ARIN next are basically screwed
>
> Why would you say Atrivo is dead?
>
> r...@localhost --- {~} nslookup www.go
Hi,
ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
So it'd be cool if I could you know, talk to someone who has involvement
with that, because frankly, I do no
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
