On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 23:52 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote: > > > Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at? > > I might argue the "few" comment, but I think it's better not to reply to > Guillaume so people who are smart enough to not see his posts (which would be > quite a bit more than a "few") will not be force to see them.
I would say that, in general, more people care about NANOG than nsp-security, although nsp-security is a worthwhile resource for those who are dealing with backbone-level problems (which is a minority of the people on NANOG, who generally are managing single typically-not-multihomed sites for the most part). > > Although I have to admit I am impressed at how quickly he has managed to piss > off, alienate, and pretty much guarantee lasting animosity from, well, pretty > much every significant person on the 'Net. Perhaps we should lump Guillaume > in with $HE_WHO_MUST_NOT_BE_NAMED[*]? Ugh, that IADL guy. I blackholed his entire IP block at edge because I got tired of receiving his crap. :D And yeah, I'm surprised Guillaume can actually post here still. William
