> On May 31, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Richard
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Date: Friday, May 31, 2019 08:04:13 -0400
>> From: Jason Kuehl >
>> Is it possible, yes. I've seen it several times now at my place of
>> work. Targeted attacks are a thing.
>>
Dan Hollis wrote:
Phishing scheme
/me gestures at this thread
If you needed more reason that NANOG might not be the place to discuss email
issues at any higher level than port numbers, this is it.
(I especially liked the "I use plain text everywhere!" message sent as HTML).
mailop lives at the perpetually-TLS-challenged
https:
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 10:53 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
> Can someone from Comcast contact me off list?
>
> Your customers can’t reach my network right now.
>
It's much bigger than just your network, and probably bigger than just Comcast.
They're aware of it, but probably kind of busy.
Cheer
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 4:29 PM, Filip Hruska wrote:
>
>
>
> This is just stupid.
>
>
>
> OVH is one of the largest server providers in the world - of course they will
> be at the top of that list.
>
> What exactly should they do, according to you?
Read their abuse@ alias. Shut down
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> I question whether there is *any* high volume hoster out there that has a
> reputation for successfully addressing abuse issues coming from their
> customer base, and cuts off services... By high volume hoster I define it
> as companies wher
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 2:16 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
> na...@studio442.com.au (Julien Goodwin) wrote:
>
>>> The first optimisation is to remove any supplied prefixes which are
>>> superfluous because they are already included in another supplied
>>> prefix. For example, 2001:67c:208c:10::/64 wo
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 1:22 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> "John Levine" writes:
>
>> Broken rDNS is just broken, since there's approximately no reason ever
>> to send from a host that doesn't know its own name.
>
> rDNS is not a host attribute, and will therefore tell you exactly
> nothing about t
> On Mar 19, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Justin Wilson wrote:
>
>
> Then you have the lists which want money to be removed. I have an IP that
> was blacklisted by hotmail. Just a single IP. I have gone through the
> procedures that are referenced in the return e-mails. No response. My next
> step s
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
>
>> 1b) anti spam filters believe in the magic of checking
>> forward/reverse match.
>
> Someone in this thread said that only malware-infested end-users are
> behind IP addresses with no reverse lookup. Well - no. As long as we
> keep telling an
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Many service providers have IPv4 reverse DNS for all their IP addresses. If
> nothing is more relevant, this will often just be the IPv4 address hashed
> somehow and tagged to the ISP domain name. For some arcane reason it
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> In a message written on Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Stephen
> Satchell wrote:
>> For the last couple of weeks, every single abuse mail I've tried to send
>> to networks in a very short list of countries has bounced back with
>> "
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Bryant Townsend wrote:
>
> *Events that caused us to perform the BGP hijack*: After the DDoS attacks
> subsided, the attackers started to harass us by calling in using spoofed
> phone numbers. Curious to what this was all about, we fielded various calls
> which al
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
> I would suggest that violation of the ISP’s ToS should also be consideration,
> since what may be illegal in one jurisdiction may not be illegal in some
> other jurisdictions.
Unless your abuse / security desk is staffed by lawyers it's
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
> Den 27. jul. 2016 17.12 skrev "Steve Mikulasik" :
>>
>> Disclaimer: I have a ton of respect for Clouldflare and what they do on
> the internet.
>
> They just lost all respect from here. Would someone from USA please report
> these gu
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Justin Paine wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> "For a long time their abuse@ alias was (literally) routed to /dev/null. I'm
> not
> sure whether that's still the case or whether they now ignore reports
> manually."
>
> @Steve It (literally) never was. :)
Yes, it was. Th
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 7:15 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> Have you tried to contact their Abuse?.
For a long time their abuse@ alias was (literally) routed to /dev/null. I'm not
sure whether that's still the case or whether they now ignore reports manually.
Cheers,
Steve
>
> mehmet
>
> On Tu
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 8:13 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2016-06-08 07:27, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> In message <20160608070525.06fd5...@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>, Tore
>> Anderson writes:
>>> * Davide Davini
>>>
>>> Blocking access to Netflix via the tunnel seems like an obvious
>>>
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
>
> * Spencer Ryan
>
>> As an addendum to this and what someone said earlier about the
>> tunnels not being anonymous: From Netflix's perspective they are. Yes
>> HE knows who controls which tunnel, but if Netflix went to HE and
>> said "Tell m
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
>
> On Mon 2016-Apr-11 13:02:14 -0400, Ken Chase wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: GeoIP put unknown IP location mappings to the 'center of the country'
>> but then rounded off the lat long so it points at this farm.
>>
>> Cant believe law enforcement
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Anybody have some recommendations on how I resolve this
>
> The most likely explanation is a configuration error at your end, so the
> first step is to share what the domain is.
Todd shared the doma
>
> Anybody have some recommendations on how I resolve this
The most likely explanation is a configuration error at your end, so the first
step is to share what the domain is.
Cheers,
Steve
> On Jul 14, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> This goes back a number of years. There was a product that literally was a
> cardboard box that contained everything one needed to get started on the
> Internet. Just add a modem and a computer, and you were on your way. No
> fuss,
On Mar 10, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> We recently got an abuse report of an IP address in our net range. However,
> that IP address isn't in use in our networks and the covering network is null
> routed, so no return traffic is possible. We have external BGP monitoring, so
> unle
On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain?
No.
But they should not, and in many cases *cannot*, rely on aol or yahoo addresses.
It would suck for them to have to change all their contact information,
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Royce Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> If your domain publishes p=reject it should not have any users
>> that participate in mailing lists.
>
> Like many, I was pretty unhappy (and busy) with the unil
On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants
>>> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service
>>> appropriate for the purpose.
>>
>> supp
On Oct 7, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Justin Krejci wrote:
> https://twitter.com/search?q=%23belkin
>
> Sounds like a bad firmware update most likely.
> Presumably the Belkin routers perform caching DNS for the LAN clients for if
> the LAN clients use alternate DNS servers (OpenDNS, Google, your ISPs, e
On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Mark Keymer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So this started a little while ago but seems to be getting worse.
>
> What I am seeing is dns servers over at godaddy not replying however I seem
> to be able to traceroute ok to them. Also I have started to see that the
> whois.godadd
On Aug 21, 2014, at 6:23 AM, Tarko Tikan wrote:
> hey,
>
> For a while now, we have been getting complains from our broadband customers
> about not being able to reach ebay.com/paypal.com
>
> We have nailed it down to some small prefixes and they are all listed in
> SORBS DUHL / Spamhaus PBL
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
>> On 03/22/2011 09:07 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly minutes
>>> after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 wa
On Jan 17, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> I fat fingered the netmask, try now.
Mmm hmm.
platter steve$ telnet 208.64.127.78 80
Trying 208.64.127.78...
Connected to 208.64.127.78.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: viagra-shopping.com
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Perma
On Oct 17, 2010, at 7:16 PM, James Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Day Domes wrote:
>> I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data
>> network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
>> any issues with this?
>
> The domain-name star
On May 28, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
Has Amazon given an official statement on this? It would be nice to
get
someone from within Amazon to give us their official view on this. It
would be even more appropriate for the other cloud infrastructures to
join in, and or have some sort
On May 23, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
Is it just us or does someone pWn *.amazonaws.com?
Every one of our mail servers is being slammed by I'm not sure what
but many thousands of user unknowns per hour (fortunately we handle
those pretty quickly but this is a deluge.)
All I know is
On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 12:43 AM, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2142
but i am surprised you asked here instead of an ietf list. here we
a
On Aug 15, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Al Iverson wrote:
On 8/15/07, Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure tasting is criminal or fraud.
Neither am I, we agree. I meant if there's subsequent criminality or
fraud that should be dealt with separately.
Dumb question, not necessarily l
On Aug 13, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
but today that provision is: If you buy a domain you have 5 days to
'return' it. The reason behind the return could be: "oops, I
typo'd" or
"hurray, please refund me for the 1M domains I bought 4.
On Aug 9, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
Yes a very big unless. Multi-core processors are already available
that would make very large BGP convergence possible. Change the
algorithm as well and perhaps add some multi-threading to it and
it's even better.
Anyone have a decent
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:21 AM, John Levine wrote:
Sounds like one of the global-scale load balancers - when you do a
(presumably) recursive DNS lookup of one of their hosts, they'll
ping
the nameserver from several locations and see which one gets an
answer the fastest.
Why would they pin
39 matches
Mail list logo
