Re: Yahoo and IPv6

Subject: Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Date: Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:56:37PM + Quoting Paul Vixie (vi...@isc.org): > :-). > > to be clear, the old pre-web T1 era internet did not have much content > but what content there was, was not lopsided. other than slip and ppp > there weren't a lot of networks

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

Subject: Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Date: Tue, May 17, 2011 at 04:22:54AM + Quoting Paul Vixie (vi...@isc.org): > > From: Owen DeLong > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:12:27 -0700 > > > > ... It's not like you can even reach anything at home now, let alone > > reach it by name. > > that must and will c

Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet

Subject: RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Date: Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:07:08PM -0400 Quoting Stefan Fouant (sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net): > > From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:t...@americafree.tv] > > even > > more snake oil now. > > And I'm afraid we'll be seeing a w

Re: Sunday Funnies: Using a smart phone as a diagnostic tool

Subject: Sunday Funnies: Using a smart phone as a diagnostic tool Date: Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:00:18PM -0500 Quoting Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com): > Do you have a smartphone? Blackberry? iPhone? Android? > > Do you use it as a technical tool in your work, either for accessing > devices or

Re: NIST and SP800-119

Subject: Re: NIST and SP800-119 Date: Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:46:01PM +0100 Quoting Mohacsi Janos (moha...@niif.hu): > >All modern TCPs support it; many firewalls are configured to block the > >necessary ICMPs. > > Then probably blackholing themselves the firewall operators And the replies

Re: AltDB?

Subject: Re: AltDB? Date: Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 06:09:13PM + Quoting John Curran (jcur...@arin.net): > On Jan 9, 2011, at 2:09 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote: > Please suggest your preferred means of IRR authentication to the ARIN > suggestion process:

Re: Blocking International DNS

Subject: Re: Blocking International DNS Date: Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:55:56PM +0100 Quoting Joakim Aronius (joa...@aronius.com): > * Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com) wrote: > > This isnt new - there have been proposals elsewhere for a resolver > > based blacklist of child porn sites. >

Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns

Subject: IPv6 6to4 and dns Date: Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:43:12PM -0800 Quoting Jeroen van Aart (jer...@mompl.net): > What would be the best way to configure your dns once you've set up IPv6 > 6to4? Separate the IPv4 and IPV6 domains or let them be the same? The same. Separation would be unneces

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:08:53PM + Quoting Nick Hilliard (n...@foobar.org): > On 08/11/2010 21:51, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > So there's empirical data that It Does Indeed Matter (at least to some > > people). > Any

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: RE: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:53:47AM -0800 Quoting George Bonser (gbon...@seven.com): > > > > Even if larger MTUen are interesting (but most of the time not worth > > the work) the sole reason I like SDH as my WAN technology is the >

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: RE: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:34:56AM -0700 Quoting George Bonser (gbon...@seven.com): > > Yes, I really don't understand that either. You would think that the > investment in developing and deploying all that SONET infrastructure > h

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: RE: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:38:33PM -0700 Quoting George Bonser (gbon...@seven.com): > No wonder there is still so much transport > using SONET. Using Ethernet reduces your effective performance over > long distance paths. The only

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:32:30PM -0700 Quoting Scott Weeks (sur...@mauigateway.com): > > > It's really quiet in here. So, for some Friday fun let me whap at the > hornets nest and see what happens... >;-) > > > http://www.ionary

Re: Terminology Request, WAS: Enterprise DNS providers

Subject: Terminology Request, WAS: Enterprise DNS providers Date: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:36:33AM -0700 Quoting Michael DeMan (na...@deman.com): > Hi, > > I have been following this thread, and am mostly curious - can somebody (or > preferably several folks) define what is meant by 'Enterprise D

Re: DNSSEC and SSL

Subject: Re: DNSSEC and SSL Date: Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:11:43AM -0400 Quoting ML (m...@kenweb.org): > On 8/22/2010 2:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > No, because DNSSEC isn't secured all the way from the DNS server to the > > application, only to the resolver. Both systems have problems, I'd

Re: Example RFI for colo provider selection

Subject: Example RFI for colo provider selection Date: Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:48:15PM -0400 Quoting Jason Lixfeld (ja...@lixfeld.ca): > I'm researching a list of some colocation providers I have here to find the > most suitable one to provide services for a project I'm working on. My > thought

Re: Inquiries to Acquire IPs

Subject: RE: Inquiries to Acquire IPs Date: Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:40:07PM -0500 Quoting Aaron Wendel (aa...@wholesaleinternet.net): > I sent an inquiry in to ARIN yesterday for a certain ASN that was available > and was told that management won't allow them to issue requested numbers. :( RIPE d

Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]

Subject: Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Date: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:31:06AM +0930 Quoting Mark Smith (na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org): > > > > > > So what happens when you change providers? How are you going to keep > > > using globals

Re: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?

Subject: Re: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Date: Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:35:32PM +0200 Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (sth...@nethelp.no): > > What I heard at a recent (within the past six months) conference was > > that "there is no customer demand for v6" so it isn't on the immediate > > needs list. He sa

Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]

Subject: RE: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU?IPv6 Group] Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:47:57AM -0500 Quoting Brandon Kim (brandon@brandontek.com): > > > Interesting, why is it causing quite a stir? Is it because they are trying to > allocate a large > po

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

> Just wait till customers start wanting to take their IP address with > them when they move... > > When that happens, I hope there will be a new generation of suckers to > fix it. There is PI space, you know ;) -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE

Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ?

Subject: Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ? Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:27:56AM +1200 Quoting Nathan Ward (na...@daork.net): > On 12/05/2009, at 4:47 AM, David Freedman wrote: > >> Yeah, interesting contact name on this: >> >> person: Fredrik Neij >> address:DCPNetworks >> address:

Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming

Subject: Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Date: Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:55:14AM +0200 Quoting Raymond Dijkxhoorn (raym...@prolocation.net): > Hi! > >> Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search. >> but i am looking for best practices and from experience people. > > The

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:26AM +0100 Quoting John R. Levine (jo...@iecc.com): >>> And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on? >> >> Anything except http; at which point everything will mo

Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:58:32AM +1000 Quoting Mark Andrews (mark_andr...@isc.org): > And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on? Anything except http; at which point everything will mo

Re: Where to buy Internet IP addresses

Subject: Re: Where to buy Internet IP addresses Date: Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:43:17PM -0400 Quoting Ricky Beam (jfb...@gmail.com): > The address space has be carved out; > there's no "uncutting" that pie. (much in the same way the /8 handed out > in the early 80's aren't being reclaimed.) I bel