https://m.facebook.com/nt/screen/?params=%7B%22note_id%22%3A10158791436142200%7D&path=%2Fnotes%2Fnote%2F
- Jorge (mobile)
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 10:25, Kain, Becki (.) via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> Does meta keep a board somewhere to tell the world it’s down?
>
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Jay
> As
They reported a major failure (fat finger source) on one of their DB
clusters.
-J
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:07 AM Jay Ashworth wrote:
> It's making the general press this hour so of course you already know
> about it but my question is this: who peers with meta and have you seen BGP
> sessions
clarinet !!
wish this was included with every subscription to internet services
-J
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:50 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> another old dog doing a search wrote to tell me they really appreciated
> that i still had some antique advice up. i had long forgotten this one.
> but
>
>
> You, seemingly, do not have much knowledge on UUNET.
>
> Of course I don't :-)
#N atina
#S Everex 386 Step 33; SCO Xenix System V 2.3.3
#O Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto
#C Jorge Marcelo Amodio
#E atina!postmaster
#T +54 1 315 4804, Fax: +54 1 315 4
>
>
> > This gets sort of merged with DTN (Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking.)
>
> I have been saying that DTN is a reinvention of UUNET.
>
Hmmm, nope not even close.
>
> As such, it should be noted that, in UUNET, availability of
> phone links between computers was scheduled.
>
You must be
FYI,
We are in the process of starting a new Working Group at IETF, Timer
Variant Routing or TVR.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/tvr/about/
Some of the uses cases are for space applications where you can predict or
schedule the availability and capacity of "links" (radio, optical)
This gets
Musk didn't do anything revolutionary, besides launching a shload of LEO
satellites.
NASA and DoD have been working for long time on optical space
communications, last year LCRD was launched and preliminary tests using it
as a relay showed 622Mpbs, this year NASA will include on one of the
cargo m
Solved years ago …
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielaam/92/8502886/8412572-aam.pdf
-Jorge
> On Jan 23, 2023, at 1:30 AM, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 1/22/23 21:54, Tom Beecher wrote:
>> Yes re: Iridium. Contrary to what the Chief Huckster may say, inter-sat
>> comms are not some r
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:32 PM Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>>
>> With IPv6Foo you can click on the icon and it will show you a table
>> listing what URLs are serving some piece of a given page with v6 and v4.
>>
>> LinkedIn for example shows the main feed page served vi
; hampered IME by github not serving git over v6. Supposedly it's coming
>> soon but so much modern
>> software fetches stuff from Github that that's a major blocker.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On 11/27/22 7:44 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> >
>> > I us
I use the same extension on Chrome.
I'm surprised that with all the recent hoopla about it, from the major
social media platforms, Twitter still shows serving their http site over
IPv4, Facebook and LinkedIn show solid IPv6.
-J
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 9:29 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> I use a web pl
Unless you are running in a very slow and resource constrained piece of
hardware, most of the latency comes from the link layer, not from the protocol
stack.
If your concern is delay and disruption, check out DTN (Delay/Disruption
Tolerant Networking,) and Bundle Protocol, we have a WG in IETF
Recommended reading …
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/iot-value-set-to-accelerate-through-2030-where-and-how-to-capture-it
-Jorge
IMHO not good.
-J
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 5:14 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> I would like to solicit the opinions of network operators on the practice
> of scanning all of, or large chunks of the internet for known
> vulnerabilities.
>
> In earlier times, this was generally viewed as being di
kick your leader out of the window first ...
- Elon
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM Jay Hennigan wrote:
> Dear Elon:
>
> Us next?
>
> - Russian citizens
>
> >
>
I feel that the reclamation of IP address space will be more painful than the
loss of connectivity, ouch.
-Jorge
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 1:12 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> Here’s a paywall-free version:
>
> https://archive.ph/TFgyg
>
>
> Andy Ringsmuth
> 5609 Harding Drive
> Lincoln, NE
I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN
to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in situations like this,
increasing the flow of real information counters the flow of misinformation.
-J
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 7:05 AM John Curran wrote:
> ICANN response re
How come such a large operation does not have an out of bound access in
case of emergencies ???
Somebody's getting fired !
-J
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:51 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
wrote:
> It looks like it might take a while according to a news reporter's tweet:
>
> "Was just on phone wi
With that kind of attitude and disconnect from reality I wonder who is the
unprofessional moron...
- Jorge (mobile)
> On May 15, 2017, at 1:12 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:07:39AM -0500, Joe wrote:
>> One word. Linux.
>
> Or BSD, or anything but Windows. Anyone
Hey!
New message, please read <http://qrcp.us/hall.php?dxudf>
Jorge Amodio
et loss, time 1001ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.270/14.278/19.287/5.009 ms
>
>
>
>
> On 11/14/14, 7:12 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>> Hi There,
>>
>> anybody seeing problems with TWC broadband access and IPv6?
>>
>> After a brief outage this morning I no l
Hi There,
anybody seeing problems with TWC broadband access and IPv6?
After a brief outage this morning I no longer have IPv6 in my residential
line and don't see any IPv6 neighbor at the other end of the coax :-(
-Jorge
I use a RouterBoard with RouterOS and afaik not the hardware nor the software
are open
-Jorge
> On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>
> Have you looked at Mikrotik.com (Software) and Routerboard.com (Hardware)
>
I just caught an alert on my desktop about high disk activity by Skype,
looking at the details it shows a 472MB of disk write activity, no
notification of upgrade or any other messages.
Trying to see if I can find what was recently written.
This the first time I see a report about such high disk
Same here, they are written with invisible bits, like invisible ink. You have
to drop some special lemon juice on your email client to be able to see it.
-Jorge
> On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:24 PM, ML wrote:
>
>> On 12/8/2013 4:59 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>>> On 12/8/2013 8:13 AM, Michael Brown wrot
I've it working with TWC with a Motorola SB6141 and a RB450G router
board running MikroTik RouterOS
I had to replace the old modem which didn't have DOCSIS 3 and upgrade
the RouterOS 6.3.
So far from both Windoze and Linux machines have now full IPv6 connectivity.
One gizmo app that became very
hta
> wrote:
>
> Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>> There is no field on the IP packet header to indicate to which
>> political mandate the packet belongs.
>
> If a service provider violates some local regulation, the
> provider will be punished, which is the political
This is not 100% true, the economics of hosting and providing layer 7
services are not longer strictly defined by geographic boundaries, also
some local companies (global or not) provide services locally regardless of
the location (or multiple locations) of the servers.
There is no field on the IP
I've never seen a byte claiming any nationality, Internet network topology is
not geopolitical (at least a vast percentage of it) and routing policy !=
politics. When now in a "cloud" world your data may get replicated anywhere,
trying to create "islands" (which btw are not immune to eavesdropp
LOL, I was typing on an iPad and didn't notice, s/nog/big/
Thanks for the catch.
-J
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't glark 'nog' in that sentence from context...
>
>
> Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>
>>
Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet is a nog part of USG's
cyber-espionage efforts is completely preposterous.
-Jorge
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> The balkanizing of the Net?
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-ant
I still have some one time pads if you are good writing fast ...
-J
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > For encryption of traffic between datacenters;There should be very
> > little session setup and teardown (very few public key operations);
> > almost all the crypto l
And you are ?
Perhaps Singapore became the equivalent of a fiscal paradise for IP packets
away from the prying eyes of the NSA ...
-J
LOL, we'll move the taps one layer down ...
-J
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock -
>
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
> From: Bill Woodcock
> To: liberationtech
> Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break f
Now is pretty clear, Randy is The Mole ROFL
-J
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Gregory Perry
> -
>
> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:14:47 +
> From: Gregory Perry
> To: Phillip Hallam-Baker
> Cc: "cryptogra...@metzdowd.com" , ianG <
You have to change way more than that. BTW the one in office didn't start this.
-Jorge
On Sep 7, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
> Not just a Canadian issue but one we should look at in the US as well.
> Deploying more IXs and routing our traffic direct instead of through the "big
> g
Just call your senator and ask her/him to stop signing the checks ...
-J
ineering problem.
I think that "privacy" on a "public" network is a very relative concept,
same as "security".
-J
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> > IMHO, there is no amount of eng
> > The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back
> > >
> >
> > Who is we ?
>
> If you bothered to read the 1st paragraph you would know.
>
I read all of it, the original article and other references to it.
IMHO, there is no amount of engineering that can fix stupid people
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/05/government-betrayed-internet-nsa-spying
>
> The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back
>
Who is we ?
-J
www.apple.com.edgekey.net.
www.apple.com.edgekey.net. 442 IN CNAME e3191.dscc.akamaiedge.net.
e3191.dscc.akamaiedge.net. 5IN A 23.42.157.15
;; Query time: 39 msec
;; SERVER: 209.18.47.61#53(209.18.47.61)
;; WHEN: Mon Sep 2 21:07:09 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 161
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013
king the CDN or just plain bad routing/peering
or the NSA is running out of cycles/memory on the tap I've in my line :-)
Cheers
Jorge
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> is anybody having any problems with sites that go through Akamai's CDN
Is the list just silent of something is not working ??
Not very common to see almost two days without messages.
-J
Hi There,
is anybody having any problems with sites that go through Akamai's CDN ?
I'm having problems to connect to many served by them, just two examples.
www.ti.com
www.newark.com
Cheers
Jorge
You are absolutely right
-Jorge
On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:55 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll put on my flame-proof undies, have some fun
> and bite at this one...
>
>
> --- s...@donelan.com wrote:
> From: Sean Donelan
>
> :: It seems odd that there are relatively good estimates
> ::
What Congress ? We have to be very careful with this the ITU may complain the
we are taking a US centric approach to the subject and the EU will debate for
months on the definition of "Library" then ICANN will initiate a PDP to figure
how to associate Library with Congress after the SSAC says i
If devices behind an L3 proxy generate packets that end in the "public"
Internet or if they get packets originated there, IMHO those devices are also
part of the Internet not just the proxy, and you also may have that proxy for
particular protocols but not all.
-Jorge
On Aug 15, 2013, at 9:05
IPV6 makes it wider
-Jorge
On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:51 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> Not as big as the one that got away... (IPv6)
>
"This big" has been a pretty accurate answer over the years
-Jorge
On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> Researchers have complained for years about the lack of good
> statistics about the internet for a couple fo decades, since the
> end of NSFNET statistics.
>
> What are the
Interesting that they are showing screen captures of a ppt file.
-Jorge
On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Warren Bailey
wrote:
> Tin foil hat Wednesday, limited supplies.
>
> Revealed: NSA program collects 'nearly everything a user does on the internet'
>
> http://gu.com/p/3hy4h
Wrong list to ask that question. After you have a network you can share your
experiences and discuss how to operate it. The "O" in NANOG stands for
Operators.
BTW your email was marked as confidential so this response does not exists
Cheers
-Jorge
On Jul 28, 2013, at 2:38 AM, Yazan Jaber wro
JVNCNet survived and became operated by Global Enterprise Services, the company
Sergio created to spin off the network out of Princeton University, GES was
acquired by Verio in 1997 and Sergio moved to start another company. Last
message I've got from him said he was in Panama providing consult
Ohh we had some of those at JVNCNet, a real piece of crap.
-Jorge
On Jul 17, 2013, at 6:56 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:36:19 -0700, Roy said:
>> On 7/17/2013 1:59 PM, Alex Harrowell wrote:
>>> On 15/07/13 01:09, Tony Patti wrote:
TWELVE years ago (press rele
for what is worth twc sucks
-J
Somebody sent a copy of the TD64 working doc to Milton Mueller of
IGP/ICANN-NCSG not yet on wcitleaks.
Be aware, the new treaty will get rid of SPAM !!
http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/06/06/td-64-for-breakfast/
-J
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Joe Provo wrote:
>
> While we will expec
With SOPA/PIPA and so much fuss about IP (not the protocol)
protection, CBS should sue the
government for using an image that looks like a Borg cube from Startrek.
-J
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, wrote:
>
> http://csrc.nist.gov/nice/framework/
>
> its only a tad over 100 pages. :) the comm
On top of all that add that there are many apps that have also been
updated today to be in sync with new iOS features.
-J
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> The simple updates for a single machine today range in the 700mb-1.5gb or
> more range 10.7.2+iTunes+one iOS image. Wit
I didn't have issues downloading the update, it took less than 10min,
but I've so many apps and stuff on a 32GB iPod that the process of
backing up, upgrade, restore, somewhere in the middle you have to
confirm some settings and backing up the apps for which I still I see
23 pending updates I guess
I agree that only those organizing or with a real need of financial
support (folks from developing countries or from non-profit orgs or
some students without substantial resources) could have their
admission fee waived or reduced, all the rest MUST pay, even if you
give a talk or serve in other cap
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>Lets say I want to apply for .WINE with commercial purposes, then what
>>is a ballpark figure for the funds/investment required ?
>
> I wouldn't try it with less than a million bucks in hand. Beyond the
> ICANN application nonsense, you'd als
> keep in mind that the venues for asking precise questions for the
> purpose of obtaining accurate answers of record are tdg-legal, or
> the saturday gnso gtld hours ("the kurt show").
"Kurt Show" that's a good one.
I was not expecting any elaborated response, just see if anybody on
that panel h
Well I just asked the question during the "Getting Ready" panel at the
ICANN 41 meeting.
Q: How much on top of the $185K is required for a new gTLD
Answers:
It is hard to say, too many variables, biz plan dependencies, if the
string will be contended it can go to a more complex/costly process,
b
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> I was talking about public perception and the ability to change it
> through marketing; not any actual security.
>
> It's like the difference between ".com" and ".biz", "people" don't
> understand when something isn't a ".com" and don't trust it.
185K is just the application few, the process includes some
requirements to have a given amount of dough for operations in escrow,
add what you need to pay attorneys, "experts"
, lobbyists, and setup and staff a small corporation even if you plan
to outsource part of the dayt-2-day operations to a
> some of us try to get work done from home. and anyone who has worked
> and/or lived in a first world country thinks american 'broadband' speeds
> are a joke, even for a home network.
amen
-J
>> So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to
>> IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get
>> this fixed.
>
> And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.
Agreed, right on the money !!
Traffic stats may not say a lot yet due to tunnels and
> ...yes, there is a serious lack of v6 enabled eyeballs. But it's also
> not clear to me from Akamai's stats just how many of the sites they host
> are v6 enabled. 2? 12? 500?
True. I'll go back to their site and dig for more detailed info about
what those "hits" are actually hitting.
Regards
J
>>> http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
>>
>> The web access column reflects access to internal content or just the
>> home page ?
>
> Mark's notes explain what he tested and clicking on any link shows
> the result of his diagnostics:
>
> http://www.mrp.net//IPv6Day_files/diagnostics/aol.com.html
>
> g
> http://www.mrp.net/IPv6Day.html
The web access column reflects access to internal content or just the
home page ?
-J
> The main objective for today is to access the web services, that's why you
> can't reach a record for a DNS query for a given NS server.
So if there are no records from where we ftp6 the HOSTSV6.TXT file ?
-J
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and >4% packet loss ?
-J
Anybody keeping any realtime stats ?
-J
> Indeed, but "reverse engineered" and "Egyptian government snooping Skype
> calls" are quite different. Whilst some people may have rather foolishly
> relied on Skype for privacy, this is now not going to happen. I doubt it'll
> make a big dent on the user base though.
Skype privacy ? hehe, th
> Consider two alternatives :
>
> - Finance guns, soldier training, refugee camps, humanitarian ground
> help and political meetings and treaties to make a revolution happens
> in a (more or less controled) bloodshed
>
> OR
>
> - Take a strong position to preserve freedom of speech and wider use
>
Is not working for me since early today, first the connection went
down and later the application crashed ... I refuse to switch to MSN.
I'm afraid that soon my monitor will explode if microsoft acquisition
of NVIDIA goes through.
BTW, after yesterday announcements at WWDC I wonder if there are s
On a second thought, does this mean that you if get arrested after
reading the Miranda thing you get free WiFi ?
-J
> http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/internet-a-human-right
Looks like the UN does not have anything more interesting or important
to do, or how to waste time and money.
What happened with the other rights? yada yada and a signature in a
paper does not mean much.
-J
> You might be interested in this cool new technology called multicast.
in this context you may be probably talking about anycast.
there are few details but without digging in too much, there are at
least two name servers for which the packets are flowing through the
same exact route and end poin
TLD is delegated and alive.
pete@tango:~$ dig -t ns xxx
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> -t ns xxx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47132
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;xxx.
>> Is there any clear understanding of what "supporting IPv6" means?
Telling some words of encouragement to your consumer grade home
broadband router that barely does IPv4 right ?
-J
> is it spring vaccation in the states, when the children are loosed upon
> the net?
not yet, in two weeks. this may be from Jeff Williams boot camp.
-J
Most sincere thanks to Merit for their long time support to the
network community,
Cheers
Jorge
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i am getting nanog list mail repeats from last may
ME2
-J
> Almost a sigh, actually; though in a moment of horrid thread convergence
> and poor taste, there was some question being tossed around as to whether
> Egypt's space could be reused, if they're not going to use it after all...
> :/
That's sounds like those bad jokes that some jerks tell at a f
Does anybody knows what is the situation with local traffic, are
people able to communicate within the country, are there any local
servers/services that are being blocked/etc. ?
-J
> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/26/internet-run-ip-addresses-happens-anyones-guess/
"It's the end of the web as we know it. " We are doomed !!
Glad to know that, since a large percentage of it suxs.
Can we go back to the ftp.funet.fi (still up !! ) and gopher ?
Cheers
Jorge
> you may want to look at how television and radio were captured and
> turned into 500 channels of crap.
but now is digital and HD crap, wired and wireless :-)
perhaps we have to develop the Content Removal Admin Protocol, aka CRAP
-J
It is amusing to see how with the passing of time we went through the
cycles of government research, open collaboration, widespread
cooperation, global ubiquity, international coordination, trademark
protection, commitments affirmation, content regulation, and we seem
to be now in the government ma
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> And if I ever find the genius who came up with the "we are not the
>> internet police" meme ...
>
> he died over a decade ago
He also said "The Internet works because a lot of people cooperate to
do things together"
Remove the "together" and t
> Yes it has:
>
> http://blog.securetrading.com/2010/12/mastercard-maestro-3-d-secure/
I've been processing cards all day for my wife's biz without any problems.
-J
BTW, at this time only the server at NL seems to be responding
-J
> However, given the political climate and general network cluelessness in the
> government sector, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to spend an hour or so
> thinking what you'd do if the humorless guys in dark suits and sunglasses
> showed up with a court order to cut off your customer's access
> ++
<< (ie *2)
-J
> Not the Department, not the Secretary, not the Joint Chiefs, just the lowly
> old spokesman, all by himself, who is "not aware." A weaker and less
> convincing denial can scarcely be imagined this side of the divorce court.
>
> And the CNN headline, while technical true :
>
> U.S. officials de
> If you want to keep your domains, don't use .com or .net.
or .jobs, .names, .edu.
-J
> I see a new T-Shirt "Free speech has an IP address"
on the front, and on the back "DDOS me Senator if you can"
-J
> Assange has irritated a large beast: the US Government.
s/a large beast/a couple of large beasts/
I believe that he is pissing off not only the USG, some other Govts
dealing with the USG behind the veil of secrecy are probably getting
very pissed with him too.
-J
> 'they' is a multicast address ... dyn/everydns or wikileaks? which is
> the 'they' that is doing the twittering?
wikileaks. seems that they (wikileaks) got the message, following
tweets included their IP address and the new .ch domain.
The current IP address for the cablegate stuff is 213.251.1
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I guess the USG's cyberwar program does work (very dryly said).
Perhaps the PRC's works too.
-J
> But Jorge has a point. If they wanted to help users get past their DNS
> problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask to be
> re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities to set up wikileaks.$FOO.com to 'crowd
> source' their name, etc.
I'll just point to an article I foun
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
