Well hard for them to establish an ipv6 connection, none of the domains for the urls I posted have an aaaa record :-)
-J On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 1:02 PM Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote: > But IPv6Foo , ast least as far as I could tell by quickly looking at the > code, cannot tell you if an IPv6 connection WOULD have worked, but IPv4 is > where it ended up. > > With Happy Eyeballs, if the IPv4 TCP session finishes up only a couple ms > faster than the IPv6 ones, the v4 one wins out. That doesn't give you any > meaningful signal as to WHY it landed on IPv4 instead. > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:32 PM Jorge Amodio <jmamo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> With IPv6Foo you can click on the icon and it will show you a table >> listing what URLs are serving some piece of a given page with v6 and v4. >> >> LinkedIn for example shows the main feed page served via v6 but there are >> a couple of pieces with v4 from these sites >> >> - dpm.demdex.net >> - lnkd.demdex.net >> - p.adsymptotic.com >> - radar.cedexis.com >> - sb.scorecardresearch.com >> - trkn.us >> >> Some may be feeding ads content, others tracking, market research, etc. >> >> Regards >> Jorge >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote: >> >>> Often lost in the 'debate' about V6 adoption is that for a 100% native >>> IPv6 experience to work, there are multiple other components that have >>> nothing to do with the network that ALSO have to work correctly. Any issues >>> with these are likely going to cause fallback to v4. >>> >>> It's very difficult to know how much v4 traffic to a website COULD have >>> worked just fine on v6, but didn't, and why it didn't. >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 7:16 PM Matt Corallo <na...@as397444.net> wrote: >>> >>>> It would be nice if IPvFoo showed the bytes and connection/request >>>> count. It's going to be a >>>> loonnggg time before we can do consumer internet browsing with no v4, >>>> until then it's about reducing >>>> cost of CGNAT with reduced packets/connections. >>>> >>>> For twitter, the main site is v4, yea, but abs.twimg.net (Edgecast) >>>> and pbs.twimg.net (Fastly) make >>>> up the vast majority of the bytes fetched on the site for me and are >>>> both v6 now. I don't recall >>>> when I last checked but they were still v4-only not too long ago. >>>> >>>> The other end of it is v6-only servers that don't accept inbound >>>> connections. Thos have been >>>> hampered IME by github not serving git over v6. Supposedly it's coming >>>> soon but so much modern >>>> software fetches stuff from Github that that's a major blocker. >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> On 11/27/22 7:44 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I use the same extension on Chrome. >>>> > >>>> > I'm surprised that with all the recent hoopla about it, from the >>>> major social media platforms, >>>> > Twitter still shows serving their http site over IPv4, Facebook and >>>> LinkedIn show solid IPv6. >>>> > >>>> > -J >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 9:29 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I use a web plugin tool called ipvfoo to track my actual ipv4 vis >>>> ipv6 >>>> > usage. I wish it worked over time. With very few exceptions I am >>>> still >>>> > regularly calling ipv4 addresses in most webpages. Has anyone >>>> done a >>>> > more organized study of say, the top 1 million, and how many still >>>> > require at least some ipv4 to exist, and those trends over time? >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work: >>>> > >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz >>>> > < >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz >>>> > >>>> > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC >>>> > >>>> >>>
