Re: Noisy prefixes in BGP

n some location but is still tied to that person or could be orphaned project/code ... but that's the story of many systems :-) Please reach out if you see any bad routing behavior. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: Noisy prefixes in BGP

I'm escalating this internally. I hope to have this resolved asap. - Jared On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 04:41:05PM +1100, Geoff Huston wrote: >Hi Romain > > We are seeing in RIS data a constant flow of update messages from a few > ASes, here is the list of the top prefi

Re: ACX6360-OX Question

if there's any payload options thos eare set correctly, be they otu or odu for your 100g signal. Have you logged into the FPC and dumped the i2c to verify the optic tuning is staying, or is it tuned with an external box, eg: flexbox? - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key avai

Re: 2 undersea cables cut

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 09:55:58AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: >I think sabotage implies intent. > >- Left here without comment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br3K93-z6PI - Jared

Re: Hurricane Electric ISP custom routing via BGP communities

as well: > Nanog is unfortunately not representative. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: IPTV Solution

that. How to route or otherwise use your multicast w/ SSM is left as an exercise to the reader. mumudvb will do IPv6 as well, despite my bad example using IPv4 only :/ - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: IPTV Solution

x27;m sure you will see no shortage of them reach out. > 6. Etc. Good luck! - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: Sept. 30 Verizon outage

> On Oct 2, 2024, at 3:55 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > > On 10/1/24 19:38, Jared Mauch wrote: >> As the market squeezes margins our tolerance for faults also narrows. > > I think with the squeeze on margins getting tighter and tighter, all manner > of

Re: Sept. 30 Verizon outage

Due to the scale of this I would expect an outage report to appear with the FCC in the next year. I do think this highlights the increased frequency and impact of these outages. Make sure you have backup plans for communications if one or more fails. While my personal impact was near nil many

Re: Wi-Fi Calling in a corporate environment

I’ve seen if there’s too much buffering or some sort of other issues it drop out and not work. I’ve actually replaced customer CPE to address this. You want to make sure that you are passing ESP through, and there’s even issues with some of the carriers not liking a phone using wifi calling if

Re: eero outage

or-blades and hate…[0] Hah, I've had some issues with the service and seem to have hit some quite interesting bugs, since they seem to attract me. I've tried to report them, but the recent outage does have me reconsidering things. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

eero outage

Does anyone know about the big eero outage going on? - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: Akamai connectivity issue across several states

in for help with little to no feedback. > > > >Can someone from Akamai reach out off-list? Its impacting quite a few key >accounts. > > > >-Schylar > >ASN395662 > > -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: HE.net problem

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2182.txtIs what you should use as guidance Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Jul 4, 2024, at 4:55 PM, Crist Clark wrote:On the other side of this, we all may be learning the value of not having all of you NS records in a single zone with a domain under a single

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Nokia you want the G6 XS-010XR-P line and the 230 enclosure UBNT also has XG and GPON PoE devices, you can dual power them from their USB + 24V passive - Their XGS unit does not do POE. I don’t recommend using the GPON SFP modules, the device they go in may not signal to you enough information

Re: Opengear alternatives that support 5g?

If someone wants to assemble some of the freetserv boxes, I have some of the PCBs and components here if you want them. - Jared > On Apr 26, 2024, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Latham wrote: > > If anyone is interested in https://freetserv.github.io/ but does not want to > build one I have sort of docum

Re: Whitebox Routers Beyond the Datasheet

> On Apr 13, 2024, at 12:15 AM, 7ri...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> I feel like this shouldn't be listed on a data sheet for just the whitebox >> hardware. The software running on it would be the gating factor. > There would be two things ... BGP convergence, and then the time required to > get r

Re: Akamai contact

ssue. https://www.akamai.com/us/en/clientrep-lookup/ - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Fiber aggregators and such

With all the $ being spent expanding fiber in the last mile, I’ve got a theory that a lot of new and diverse fiber routes are being built between locations. There’s a few places I know that roll up some of this information, but I’m wondering if there’s anyone rolling this all up either publicly

Re: puck not responding

logy to improve to the point where auto-updates and many other things are without trouble, sadly i had to do a bit of physical moving of things, but the machine should now have a ~10g uplink and if I can find the right 100g device that I'm happy with I'm in a better position to update/upgr

Re: puck not responding

> On Feb 29, 2024, at 10:56 AM, Jay Acuna wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:22 AM Jared Mauch wrote: >> > > Apparently some of the most important email lists, Outages, etc, are > being kept online by 1 person's Unix/Linux server. > There’s other peop

Re: puck not responding

> On Feb 28, 2024, at 1:30 AM, Daniel Marks via NANOG wrote: > > We’re getting rocked by storms here in Michigan, could be related. > [ brief version of what happened from what I can tell reconstructing things] I was alerted ~4am US/E yesterday about the issue. This machine has been gener

sendgrid.net contact

If you have a contact there can you please contact me off-list. Thanks. - Jared

Re: Internet Exchange Visualization

> On Aug 15, 2023, at 3:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> actually, i am amazed by the extent of "remote peering." if one >> measures rtt to all the peers on the six, for example, the curve goes >> out to well over 200ms. the six has seen remote peers from the gulf >> states, and i do not mean l

Re: Hawaiian ILEC infrastructure and fire

> On Aug 17, 2023, at 1:55 PM, TJ Trout wrote: > > I'm familiar with the island, it's it's puzzling that the major 3 cell > carriers would accept a single point of failure like that, you would think > they had microwave backup at minimum. Maybe it was a generator issue. > It’s common for

Re: Flapping Transport

> On Aug 1, 2023, at 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I have a wave transport vendor that suffered issues twice about ten days > apart, causing my link to flap a bunch. I put in a ticket on the second set > of occurrences. I was told that there was a card issue identified and would > be not

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

> On May 16, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > > > On 5/16/23 7:35 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote: >> +1 to what Josh writes below. I would also differentiate between mobile >> networks (service provisioned to individual devices & often carrier s/w on >> the device) and wireli

Re: New addresses for b.root-servers.net

I know when I did the openresolver project stuff I saw a number that would send glue or referrals from before they moved to the root servers domain names. - Jared Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Jun 2, 2023, at 8:49 AM, Nathan Ward wrote: On 2/06/2023 at 10:22:46 AM, Wes Hardaker

Re: Routed optical networks

> On May 11, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 5/11/23 15:50, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote: > >> Hi Jared, >> Could I make a conclusion from your comments: "only Carrier itself >> understand the traffic - see many examples in the text". >> I would very agree to this. > >

Re: Routed optical networks

> On May 11, 2023, at 7:45 AM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG > wrote: > > To clarify the table I linked to in the previous email: > > Cisco estimates IP traffic exchanged over the access network by both > businesses and consumers with: > > • endpoints over managed networks and > • e

Re: Routed optical networks

> On May 2, 2023, at 5:11 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > > I’ve seen proposals for an LSR MPLS/ROADAM type solution, where imagine you > are at a hop where in a long distance system solution, you would end up with > OEO, but instead you get directionality capability with an IP/MPLS c

Re: Routed optical networks

> On May 4, 2023, at 6:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 5/4/23 11:40, Denis Fondras wrote: > >> >> You may also take into account the time to deliver. >> Laying fiber takes much more time than plugging a colored optic. > > Indeed - part of the expense of running new fibre is the time i

Re: Spectrum networks IPv6 access issue

> On May 2, 2023, at 2:43 PM, Daniel Marks via NANOG wrote: > > This has been “resolved", I finally got through to some awesome engineer at > Spectrum who has rerouted traffic while they work with their hardware vendor > (thanks Jake): One of the tools that I’ve used in the past is the RIP

Re: Routed optical networks

> On May 2, 2023, at 2:29 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG > wrote: > > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote: > > In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a > > better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take

Re: Dormant space on blacklists, how can I resolve this?

I’ll help you off-list. - Jared > On Apr 27, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > > Hello, > > I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of > 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our > datacenter which shutdown a couple years

Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR)

> On Apr 3, 2023, at 4:54 PM, Tony Wicks wrote: > > I have been using the QSFP-100G-CWDM4 2k optics for within rack/DC for a > couple of years now. They are about the same price as SR optics but allow the > use of simple duplex single mode patches without blasting 10K optics at each > othe

Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR)

recommend FR1. They're available at a great price-point, and > 2km reach is adequate for most applications. > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are > supporting the LR1 to all

SF union square area fiber

Can someone who is familiar with the fiber assets around the union square area in SF ping me off-list? Thanks. - jared

100G-LR1 (DR/FR)

The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400G and future 800G optics as those use breakout to support 100G ports. Would you rather do a 400G port on a router vs 100LR1? Curious what others think. Sent via RFC1925 com

Re: Increasing problems with geolocation/IPv4 access

> On Jan 20, 2023, at 11:29 PM, Crist Clark wrote: > > Are you sure it’s really geolocation blocks? Or is it anonymizer and VPN > service detection? The geoIP vendors typically sell both since one of > anonymizers’ top applications is to evade geolocation. Have customers using > peer-to-pee

Re: Increasing problems with geolocation/IPv4 access

> On Jan 20, 2023, at 8:02 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > I will repeat what I have been saying since the first discussions of the > concept of ip geo-location some decades ago… > > An IP address is not tied to any of the following: > Location > Person > > An IP address may be trans

Increasing problems with geolocation/IPv4 access

I’ve been seeing an increasing problem with IP space not having the ability to be used due to the behaviors of either geolocation or worse, people blocking IP space after it’s been in-use for a period of time. Before I go back to someone at ARIN and say “your shiny unused 4.10 IP space” is non-

Re: Google Speed Test

only impacts a few flows. - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: ROAs Expire

etup (eg: roa watch, similar to x509watch on *nix systems) would be appropriate. I'm sure others can refer to tools or services that can do this, but it's always a good idea to check your objects and watch when they go away or expire. - Jared -- Jared Mauc

Re: Geoip database update

I've been waiting for some updates since September, there are good and reputable geoIP services that accept updates and those that refuse to acknowledge issues or have no way to update. Some of the financial institutions and government agencies are examples of bad consumers of them, but it's n

Re: Random shower thought: GBIC with LC connector...

> On Nov 15, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:55 PM, Eric Litvin wrote: > A, Gbics: > > If you google ws-g5483, 84, 86, 87 - you’ll see the whole line up. All had sc > connectors except 83 which was copper rj45 connector. > > > > Well

Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers

like all those cloud on-ramp type services, you may end up with traffic blackholed or other side-effects. Simply put, SAV/BCP-38 et al is hard, and nearly impossible when you get much further away from the subnet that traffic originates from. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key

Re: Geo-IP Sling.com and/or Dish Network Contact.

delay to the providers as > well. > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > > > Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else > > it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their > > service. > > &

Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers

we don't accept the traffic"? Are you putting in some kind of fall back > > filter > > in based on something like IRR data? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Charles Rumford (he/his/him) > > Network Engineer | Deft > > 1-312-268-9342 | charl...@deft.com > > deft.com > > -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: Geo-IP Sling.com and/or Dish Network Contact.

Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their service. Or if someone knows why 23.138.114.0/24 would be geolocated outside US/Michigan would be great to know. Thanks!Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn

Re: AKAMAI Contact

Please ping me off list. Thanks. Sent via RFC1925 compliant device > On Sep 28, 2022, at 3:47 PM, Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote: > >  > Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI? > > Thanks in advance. > > Josh

Re: Akamai Contact/Issues

You can ping me off list. Thanks. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 26, 2022, at 1:39 PM, Dustin Brooks wrote: Anyone having issues with sites hosted by Akamai?  We have several users within a single /24 that are not able to access several (go.microsoft.com, www.irs.gov, adobe.com, n

Samsung too?

I tried to place some new IP space under 4.10 ARIN into service and there's some Samsung thing that doesn't work now per customer reports so I moved people back out, so if there's someone who knows about that I'd also appreciate a ping. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 17, 2022, at 2:34 PM,

Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC

> On Aug 2, 2022, at 4:31 PM, John Levine via NANOG wrote: > > It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG said: >> >> On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote: >>> It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter >>> being Jared's situation) > > I don't understand

NANOG List posts and DMARC

Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as if one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large. Not sure who manages it anymore these days. - Jared

Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia

> On Aug 2, 2022, at 11:58 AM, Tom Beecher wrote: > > This conventional interpretation is the one I'm applying in this question. > > I would argue even the 'conventional' definition of 'Tier 1' has been > nebulous for long enough that it doesn't really matter much anymore. > > Who a networ

Re: Akamai Peering

> > > > > > Jawaid > > > > > > > > > > > > *[image: uc%3fid=1CZG_hGEeUP_KD95fSHu2oBRA_6dkOo6n]* > > > > *Jawaid Bazyar* > > > > Chief Technical Officer > > > > VERO Broadband > > > > [image: signature_3735065359] > > > > 303-815-1814 > > > > [image: signature_3363732610] > > > > jbaz...@verobroadband.com > > > > [image: signature_60923] > > > > https://verobroadband.com > > > > [image: signature_4057438942] > > > > 2347 Curtis St, Denver, CO 80205 > > > > > > -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: HE.net and BGP Communities

You always want to prefer customer routes over non customer routes as a service provider. Of course having a robust set of communities to let adjustments happen helps. Without proper tiering of routes you may see unstable routing. Having a standard set of customer, peer, transit set of local

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

> On Jul 11, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote: > > This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons, specifics > are likely not in the cards. As most services ride over common service > networks, its quite possible that a network substrate failure can have a > numb

Re: is nanog really in the spoofer report?

I can confirm that the hardware that NANOG does use can't filter it all automatically I think for v6 as I helped them look at it. Sent via RFC1925 compliant device > On Jul 10, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Matthew Luckie wrote: > >  >> >> I just realized that many automatically put emails with the sub

Re: FCC BDC engineer?

Yeah the big thing I’ve seen is that companies have historically over claimed on their 477 reports in weird and interesting ways. I understand why and how it happens, for example, if we do a HH meet for service at location X in census tract 2020-01 and I have a 2 mile loop to location Y in cens

Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements

> On Jun 14, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: > > With the current shortages and lead times, I almost feel like I did back in > the beginning of my career --- > > Then it was "what can we do with what we can afford" now it's more like > "What can we do with what we have (or ca

Re: Comcast Network Peer Survey on DSCP/ECN for L4S

This seems to be missing some of the reasons/why things are remarked, perhaps it would be wise to bring some of the people interested in this to the various vendor-specific lists or such? For example, for some hardware types, enabling any sort of rate shaping at all will rewrite the DSCP values

Re: [Story] When IPv6 Fixes IPv4 Peering Issues

> On Jun 13, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Brielle wrote: > > I quickly reconfigured the Cys WireGuard node to connect to the Den node over > IPv6 and, after WireGuard did its magic dynamically reconfiguring endpoints, > suddenly the connection was back up and routing at full speed. Hell yeah! > > So,

Re: Upstream bandwidth usage

Yes, XG-PON. > > Most FTTH operator stories I've heard of are still running regular GPON, > thought. > > Seems XG-PON has a high barrier-to-entry for el-cheapo home consumers. You would be surprised. The equipment isn't that expensive in the grand scheme of thin

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

ong-haul fiber passing them but can't get service. Not everyone is that lucky, but I've seen places with 2-3 fiber providers that pass them and none offer service. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

> On May 31, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG > wrote: > > All the large DOCSIS networks of which I am aware are in fact working on > changing their spectrum plan and physical layer to enable higher US speeds > and in some cases symmetric multi-gig services. Yes, I’ve seen Com

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

Sadly thus us repeating the same problematic data based on average usage by older Americans vs usage by younger people or those of us with several children. I agree with the average utilization but when it comes to those peaks my customers can finish their uploads or restores quickly when they

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

> On May 26, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG > wrote: > >> Latency is a limitation for things that are generally relatively low >> bandwidth (interactive audio, zoom, etc.). >> Higher bandwidth won’t solve the latency problem > > +1 > IMO as we enter the 'post-gigabit era', an

Re: BGP Javascript Map/Visualization

where it's hosted, and it was a bit amusing when I left NTT that he gave me grief about the as2914.net domain registration ... I would love to see it updated, even if it's not from the 2914 vantage point, i think he left some docs about how it was done. - jared -- Jared

Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

> manipulate PIM assert winner in Cisco boxes though. Highest IP is the > winner if IGP costs are the same to the source. > > R > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:02 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > > > If this is ASM, what device is the RP? You may want to configure MSDP &g

Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

If this is ASM, what device is the RP? You may want to configure MSDP between PE1/PE2 to help if that’s the case, or is this SSM or something else you may want to just flip the PIM priority to make it pick what you want and see if you can tie it to your HSRP (Cisco, might I suggest VRRP so you

Re: Anyone have contacts for Akamai GeoIP

Yup.. ping me with the details off-list - Jared > On Mar 2, 2022, at 7:02 PM, Christopher Munz-Michielin > wrote: > > Hey All, > > Hoping someone has a contact at Akamai who can assist. > > As part of my day job I run a DNS network and we've been having issues with > Akamai mis-locating the

Re: home router battery backup

> On Jan 13, 2022, at 12:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Brandon Martin said: >> AT&T and Comcast don't seem to provide battery by default if you buy >> voice service from them. > > The only major power outage I've experienced at my house (I've been here > over 20 years) was

Re: Can it really be this quiet?

> On Jan 3, 2022, at 2:53 PM, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > > Hi Allen, > > Yes, it can be this quiet. It’s good news, it means the thing is mostly > working :-) > > I wish everyone a happy and calm 2022! > I’m surprised nobody talked about the major provider outages that happened over

Re: Log4j mitigation

> On Dec 13, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > The bigger problem seems to be the ever growing list of products you may be > using which depend on it potentially without your knowledge. This isn’t a new problem. This is an great modern example showing how deeply embedded things could

Re: Log4j mitigation

This is largely a patching exercise for people that use the software. If you use it, please patch. Sent via RFC1925 complaint device > On Dec 10, 2021, at 10:59 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > > The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this > Log4j issue that sounds

Re: private 5G networks?

> On Dec 5, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > > On 01.12.21 15:17, Tom Beecher wrote: >> While you are correct that it's just as illegal to intentionally interfere >> with the unlicensed wifi bands as it is with CBRS, the difference is that >> the FCC and regulatory bodies are much mo

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast

but the client side OS will still be a variable that is difficult to digest. Not sure how many people are running very old IP stacks. This is another hard to measure problem. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast

> On Nov 18, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > as a measurement kinda person, i wonder if anyone has looked at how much > progress has been made on getting hard coded dependencies on D, E, 127, > ... out of the firmware in all networked devices. At least the E space is largely usable l

Re: IPv6 and CDN's

other CDNs do have IPv6 on the authorities and should work without issues. eg: dig -6 +trace www.akamai.com. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

Re: DNS pulling BGP routes?

This is quite common to tie an underlying service announcement to BGP announcements in an Anycast or similar environment. It doesn’t have to be externally visible like this event for that to be the case. I would say more like Application availability caused the BGP routes to be withdrawn. I

Re: Disaster Recovery Process

> On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Karl Auer wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 08:50 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: >> A few reminders for people: >> [excellent list snipped] > > I'd add one "soft" list item: > > - in your emergency plan, have one or tw

Disaster Recovery Process

> On Oct 4, 2021, at 4:53 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote: > > How come such a large operation does not have an out of bound access in case > of emergencies ??? > > I mentioned to someone yesterday that most OOB systems _are_ the internet. It doesn’t always seem like you need things like modems o

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

I mostly agree with this. Even new hardware like eero doesn't do v6 by default. It's just off. So many things are like this. It's nice that LTE and other deployments have v6 by default. Last time I knew providers like t mobile are great but their MVNOs like Ultra Mobile do not do v6. All this

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

> On Sep 16, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Ca By wrote: > > > > > This has nothing to do with IPv6, of course, other than that modern phones use > VoLTE so within a mobile carrier's network your voice call is probably handled > using IPv6 transport. > > Good point John. > > A lot of folks missed tha

Re: do bgp optimizers think?

> On Sep 9, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune > what they announce? slfow? exploration? ouija board? > > randy Generally via sFlow or other traffic detail models. - Jared

9500 BGP Contact

Hello, I’m looking for someone at 9500 that can look into why you started announcing some IP space starting on August 25th intermittently that is causing an operational network issue. Can you please contact me off-list? Thanks - jared

Re: Reminder: Never connect a generator to home wiring without transfer switch

> On Aug 25, 2021, at 10:04 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > You need to make these things fool-proof. We haven't traveled in over a year > but the day we do, it's a recipe for disaster if the person that deals with > this stuff is on the road when the power goes out back at home. This is why I pe

Re: Setting sensible max-prefix limits

> On Aug 18, 2021, at 9:38 AM, John Kristoff wrote: > > Maybe because there isn't a simple, universal approach to setting it. > Probably like a lot of people, historically I'd set it to > some % over the current stable count and then manually adjust when the > limits were about to be breached,

AS20940 Max Prefix and as-path filtering

Hello, Akamai has been increasing the routes we are advertising in various locations as part of ongoing network changes. If you have a max-prefix set for Akamai can you please increase v4 to 1k and ensure you are accepting our additional ASNs that may live behind the clusters. We are going

Re: Global Akamai Outage

Work hat is not on, but context is included from prior workplaces etc. > On Jul 25, 2021, at 2:22 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > It doesn't seem like a tenable solution, when the solution is 'do > better', since I'm sure whoever did those checks did their best in the > first place. So we must assume

Re: Global Akamai Outage

> On Jul 22, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > > The outage appears to have, ironically, taken out the outages and > outages-discussion lists too. > > Kinda like having a fire at the 911 dispatch center… Should not have impacted me in my hosting of the list. Obviously if the dom

Re: Alien waves

I looked at this before and go far enough in the conversations with one carrier that had sold this as a product before and had a poor experience with the customers they were no longer offering it. You are likely better off getting a volume deal on waves, which can be had for pretty cheap these d

Re: 100G, input errors and/or transceiver issues

> On Jul 19, 2021, at 1:50 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 20:19, Graham Johnston > wrote: > >> I don't at this point have long term data collection compiled for the issues >> that we've faced. That said, we have two 100G transport links that have a >> regular background le

Re: A crazy idea

> On Jul 19, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote: > > On 7/19/21 5:41 AM, Feldman, Mark wrote: >> What you propose is not outlandish; some ISPs have been dual stack >> and providing some combination of these services for years. They >> already provide IPv6 ip6.arpa delegations should the

Internet Quality workshop CFP for the internet architecture board (IAB)

I know that many operators shift traffic based on network and internet quality (or don’t use certain networks at all). This is a great chance to share information about things operators have experienced or do to actively measure or otherwise to inform those decisions. - snip - For complete de

Re: Muni broadband sucks (was: New minimum speed for US broadband connections)

> On Jun 2, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 31, 2021 Mike Hammett wrote: Muni broadband does suck, but that's another thread for another day. >>> Excluding cases where muni broadband doesn't suck, why does muni broadband >>> suck? >>> >>> Personally I wouldn't

Re: Google IP Geolocation

I've had a similar issue in the past trying to get ready to peer with them. I wanted portal access to look at things. I may yet post a geofeed file just because. (I was also rejected a portal account, didn't escalate to friends at google because I know my traffic is under a gig for now). - J

Re: wow, lots of akamai

on't upgraded for a day a month of thsi big traffic, but when one of their customers has issues they immediately escalate to us to ask us to move (and we try hard to do that). It's not all throw bandwidth at the problem, but with 100g optics being so cheap these days, it may be the lower

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >