Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again

2 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Thank you for the notice. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Feb 10, 2017 12:42 PM, "Alexander Harrowell

Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again

I'm getting suspicious e-mail pretending to come from leading NANOGers. Not the first time this has happened, but you may want to be warned. Yours, Alex Harrowell

Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT

This is a really interesting thread; my telco clients are mad keen on various solutions of this general form. As a rule they would love to consolidate their various SME and enterprise CPEs down to a single x86 box that gets configured with VNFs from a central VIM or container pool. But they'd also

Re: ATT Mobile Outage San Juan, PR 8+ hours, 1 Million out.

you mean there's an outages.org outage? [sorry] On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Nathan Schrenk wrote: > It looks like www.outages.org stopped being updated with outage data in > January 2013? > > Nathan > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > > > > On May 4, 2016, at 4:3

Re: Fiber to the home specialists/consultants?

Diffraction? (i.e. Benoit Felten's company) http://www.diffractionanalysis.com/services/what-we-do On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Fletcher Kittredge wrote: > Since two asked: Tilson > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: > > > Ditto. > > On W

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Hugo, I still don't think that you have quite made it to the distinction that > we are looking for here. > > In the case of the hotel, we are talking about an access point that connects > via 4G to a cellular carrier. An access point that att

Re: GMail contact - misroute / security issue

Related oddness: if you're British and a GMail user, you either got a gmail.com username before the lawsuit, or you got a googlemail.com between the lawsuit and the point when Google and the owner of the "gmail" trademark settled, or then you got a gmail.com again. Google chose to alias googlemail

Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Matt Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:16:36AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> On 28-Jul-2014 8:06 am, "Matt Palmer" wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:28:08PM -0700, Richard Bennett wrote: >> > > It's more plausible that NAACP and LULAC have

Re: What Net Neutrality should and should not cover

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:25 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: >> On 4/27/2014 3:30 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> In a non-stupid world, the cable companies would do video on demand >>> through some combination of content caches at the head end or, for

Re: How to fix authentication (was LinkedIn)

On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 04:16:22 Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Leo Bicknell" > > Yes, but you're securing the account to the *client PC* there, not to > > the human being; making that Portable Enough f

Re: Dear Linkedin,

The Cambridge University Computer Lab has had a crack at this question in their Technical Report 817 on Web authentication: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-817.html Their conclusion is to use the Mozilla password manager (or close analogue, but they like it because it's open sou

Re: Muni Fiber (was: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc)

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:45 AM, William Herrin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Jacob Broussard > wrote: > > Who knows what technology will be like in 5-10 years? That's the whole > > point of what he was trying to say. Maybe wireless carriers will use > > visible wavelength lasers t

L3 consequences of WLAN offload in cellular networks (was - endless DHCPv6 thread)

In the DHCP v6 thread, there was some discussion of mobility and its IP layer consequences. As various people pointed out, cellular networks basically handle this in the RAN (Radio Access Network) and therefore at layer 2, transparently (well, as much as things ever are) for IP purposes. It th

Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation

On Monday 21 Nov 2011 20:27:55 Owen DeLong wrote: > I suspect that mDNS/Rendezvous will become much more widespread in > the IPv6 household and will become the primary service discovery > mechanism. It actually works quite well and is relatively resilient to > either frequent renumbering or the il

Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue

On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 23:37:20 Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 25/09/2011 12:39, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > I think a special mention should go to hardware vendors who adopt this > > dreadful practice in network equipment. I recently encountered an > > enterprise-grade WLAN

Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue

On Sunday 25 Sep 2011 04:09:22 Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > Just an fyi for anyone who has a marketing person dreaming up a big nxdomain > > redirect business cases, the stats are actually very very poor... it does > > not make much money at all.

Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a nationwide network

On Saturday 17 Sep 2011 22:37:46 Randy Bush wrote: > one to post overly aggressive defensive messages on nanog I am not convinced that Mr. Bush is best placed to comment on this particular issue. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining a

Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)

On Friday 09 Sep 2011 16:25:35 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:09:38 EDT, Jean- francois.tremblay...@videotron.com said: > > > A very interesting point. In order to save precious CGN resources, > > it would not be surprising to see some ISPs asking CDNs to provide > > a p

Re: Microsoft deems all DigiNotar certificates untrustworthy, releases updates

On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 17:17:10 Network IP Dog wrote: > FYI!!! > > http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoftpri0/2016132391_microsoft_dee > ms_all_diginotar_certificates_untrust.html > > Google and Mozilla have also updated their browsers to block all DigiNotar > certificates, while App

Re: DDoS - CoD?

On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 09:14:26 Greg Chalmers wrote: > Could be legitimate CoD servers responding to a spoofed query? My first thought looking at the packet dump. Interesting that some poor sap's hotmail address is embedded in it. > How much > traffic are you talking about out of curiosity? > >

Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics

On Monday 05 Sep 2011 15:53:38 Owen DeLong wrote: > This is true in terms of whether you care or not, but, if one just looks at whether it changes the content of the FIB or not, changing which arbitrary tie breaker you use likely changes the contents of the FIB in at least some cases. > > The k

RE: NANOGers home data centers - What's in your closet?

Eric Krichbaum wrote: >I have a 12 pack of single mode run between wiring closets upstairs and >downstairs. Only one server running feeding media to my xbmc's >everywhere >but quite a bit on gig. Nothing overly noisy unless you have your head >in >the closets. > >Eric > Anyone got experience w

Communications networks "will be closed down"

http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2011/08/uk-riots-david-cameron- announces-his-prescription/ I feel this is operational or at least potentially so. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining about them signature.asc Description: This is a d

Re: IPv6 end user addressing

On Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 14:57:54 Jeroen Massar wrote: > PS: the more power to your kids if they can sniff the network for your > 'adult content', decode it, and then actually watch it Indeed; I'd be more interested in making sure that, say, you can efficiently multicast the live footy to two di

Re: IPv6 end user addressing

On Monday 08 Aug 2011 22:00:52 Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:15:17 +0200, Mohacsi Janos said: > >> > >>> - Home users - they usually don't know what is su

Re: Ready For A Good Laugh

On Friday 10 Jun 2011 05:31:44 Michael Painter wrote: > Jimi Thompson wrote: > > Now I'm going to go off on you people - What kind of crack are you people > > smoking? > > The same stuff they're smoking over at PayPal. > Some genius decided to send out E-mails which said: > "Hello , > > It look

Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?

On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote: > On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote: > > > And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on which ip, as you can see the user-agent doesn't exactly match IP range. > > Googlebot-Image/1.0 > Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googl

Re: DWDM Metro Access Design

What's the constraint that rules out using SONET or something similar, which is designed to give you a robust ring topology? I think it's probably quite important to know whether that's really, absolutely out of the question, or whether it's a possibility to relax that in favour of a less painfu

Fasthosts postmaster

Can someone who's a mail admin at Fasthosts Ltd. in the UK/AS15148 contact this customer off list? Messagelabs is rejecting random e-mail from one of your SMTP boxes (error 553: Spam, exchange-out-45.livemail.co.uk/213.171.216.45). Your phone number goes to people who don't know what a postmaste

Re: IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!

On Wednesday 02 March 2011 03:03:22 JC Dill wrote: > > I *love* using Bozo filters. Anytime you can trick companies into > revealing their true colors, you are a step ahead in the game. > > jc > AKA the Brown M&M gambit. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

On Friday 11 February 2011 15:00:57 Scott Helms wrote: > While Facebook working over IPv6 will be a big deal you won't get all of > their traffic since a significant fraction of that traffic is from > mobile devices which are going to take much longer than PCs to get to > using IPv6 in large num

Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers

There are major GSM-land wireless operators who provide service to devices like Novatel's line of pocket-size WLAN hotspots. You can just buy one and stick a SIM in it, but some of the ops offer them as part of a business user package. I hope that means they get a proper IP or more handed out

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Friday 28 January 2011 21:22:55 Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Christopher Morrow > > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote: > >> For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET > >> PIP). > > > > that's the MCI

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Friday 28 January 2011 20:36:30 George Bonser wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jake Khuon [mailto:kh...@neebu.net] > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:07 PM > > To: Patrick W. Gilmore > > Cc: NANOG list > > Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt > > > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 a

Re:

On Monday 13 December 2010 17:02:59 Atticus wrote: > Cc I presume this is some sort of spam-test? -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining about them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: wikileaks unreachable

What is the MLC position on threatening the lives of political adversaries via the list? At least he didn't swear, I guess. That would be wrong. "Andrew Kirch" wrote: >On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations >> state lev

Re: On the control of the Internet.

I'll bet that is a political statement, against list rules. Larry is currently making up a really high percentage of list traffic and this is beginning to annoy. L "Larry Sheldon" wrote: >On 6/13/2010 15:54, Joe Greco wrote: > >> If we want to be pedantic, Sony this year announced that it is sh

Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

This would appear to be political in nature and therefore not operational, right? "Larry Sheldon" wrote: >On 6/9/2010 08:21, Joe Greco wrote: > >> Your car emits lots of greenhouse gases. Just because it's /less/ doesn't >> change the fact that the Prius has an ICE. We have a Prius and a HiHy

Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

No, but we can and do require cars to have functional brakes and minimum tread depths, and to be tested periodically. Obviously this is acceptable because the failure modes for cars are worse, but the proposed solution is less intrusive being after the fact. Excuse topposting, on mobile. "Joe

Re: MikroTik strikes again ?

On Monday 03 May 2010 11:25:45 Bret Clark wrote: > Uhmokay...but why does anyone prepend their ASN that much? Are you > saying the Mikrotik did that on purpose? > There was a well-known routing incident last year in which a difference between the Mikrotik and Cisco CLIs caused the propagati

Re: Starting up a WiMAX ISP

On Wednesday 28 April 2010 03:13:24 John R. Levine wrote: > > Of course what they offer over those "long long rural runs" and what they can > > actually provide are two different things. DSL performance decreases with > > distance rather dramatically.. > > That's what I thought, but my friend

Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways

On Wednesday 10 March 2010 14:09:18 Tim Franklin wrote: > > Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and "corporate compliance > >offices" and professional whiners. > > The obvious answer is that if your corporate email policy makes you look > like an idiot, post to mailing lists from a person

Re: dark fiber and sfp distance limitations

On Friday 01 January 2010 23:19:30 Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Mike wrote: > > I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I > > don't have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes, > > and so I am wondering what

Re: ip-precedence for management traffic

On Tuesday 29 December 2009 22:22:05 Randy Bush wrote: > > None of us knows precisely what we're going to absolutely require, or > > merely want/prefer, tomorrow or the next day, much less a year or two > > from now. Unless, of course, we choose to optimize (constrain) > > functionality so tightly

Re: FTTH Active vs Passive

Another issue - how far does the technology support open access/infrastructure sharing/wholesaling? Not only are networks that get public funding likely to be expected to provide these, but there is evidence that they are important financially. Benoit Felten's presentation at eComm Europe sugg

Re: ISP/VPN's to China?

On Thursday 22 October 2009 12:38:11 Chris Edwards wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Alex Balashov wrote: > | Understood. I guess the angle I was going more for was: Is this > | actually practical to do in a country with almost as many Internet users > | as the US has people? > | > | I had always ass

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility

On Wednesday 07 October 2009 00:27:55 Joe Greco wrote: > Assuming that the existence of an infected PC in the mix translates to > some sort of inability to make a 911 call correctly is, however, simply > irresponsible, and at some point, is probably asking for trouble. > > ... JG Also, someone me

Re: operations contact @ facebook?

This is a classic case of one of the problems of the increasingly numerous and powerful Web dev platforms - as you let other people either control your app through an API, or even write code that executes on the server-side, you're increasing the cycles available to an attacker. It's similar to

Re: Gmail Down?

On Thursday 24 September 2009 16:53:32 Jeff MacDonald wrote: > On Thursday 24 September 2009 11:20:06 Michael Holstein wrote: > > > Anyone else seeing Google's Gmail down right now? > > I am not able to use "google talk" at the moment. each time I try to send > an IM, I get a "500" error. > London

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

On Thursday 27 August 2009 15:04:59 Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:58:22AM +0100, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > An interesting question: as the population gets sparser, the average > > trench mileage per subscriber increases. At some poi

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

On Wednesday 26 August 2009 23:16:17 Robert Enger - NANOG wrote: > As tedious as the downstream can be, engineering the upstream path of a > cable plant is worse. A lot of older systems were never designed for > upstream service. Even if the amps are retrofitted, the plant is just not > tight enou

Re: dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky

There are really two security problems here, which implies that two different methods might be necessary: 1) Authenticate the nameserver to the client (and so on up the chain to the root) in order to defeat the Kaminsky attack, man in the middle, IP-layer interference. (Are you who you say you

Re: cisco.com

Up via Sprintlink in London... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: EU elections - piratenpartei.net censored

On Sunday 07 June 2009 23:16:12 Peter Dambier wrote: > Hello, > > right during the election the website > > piratenpartei.net > > of the german pirates party gets censored by the hoster. > > alfahosting.info > > Good advertising, isn't it? > > Interestingly enough their website is down too. > Afrai

Re: Looking for AT&T / Verizon / Sprint WWAN service impressions - on or off-list replies welcome

On Thursday 16 April 2009 03:08:52 Eddie wrote: > > Also interested in similar information on impressions of similar EMEA > > WWAN service providers, particularly Vodaphone and T-Mobile, if anyone > > has experiences with these. > I regularly use 3UK (Hutchison)'s data service. £10 gets you 15GB o

Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?

On Thursday 09 April 2009 16:48:32 Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote: > Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch) > networks have Gi segment (interface between GGSN & IP Router/firewall). Due > to the IP address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi firewall to >

Verizon EVDO issues

On Thursday 09 April 2009 15:31:10 Daniel Senie wrote: > On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:15 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > > > Interesting. When I got my Sprint EVDO card (u727) a year and a half > > ago, they were pretty nasty about gunning down (bidirectional spoofed > > RST coming out of the middle of

Re: Verizon EVDO Issues

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:10:24 Charles Wyble wrote: > Been troubleshooting a very strange problem for a couple of weeks now. > > I have a few hundred systems deployed throughout the United States > utilizing EVDO connectivity with Verizon as a carrier. They are stationary. > > Over the past few

Re: Netflix, Blockbuster, and streaming content ... what impact?

Regarding OnLive, the short answer would appear to be that it's like streaming video, but more latency-critical.

Re: Netflix, Blockbuster, and streaming content ... what impact?

The UK has already had this experience in early 2008 when the BBC began making huge amounts of TV content available through its iPlayer project. The impact on the DSL ISP industry was..not pretty. Our company did quite a bit of analysis on the results: http://www.telco2.net/blog/2008/02/bbcs_iplaye

Re: Seeking Connectivity in IRAQ

NewSkies' NSS703 is apparently intended to cover Turkey and Iraq especially well; www.talia.net and probably many others resell the service, or you can buy it directly (http://www.newskies.com/ipsyssolutions.htm). Perhaps you could say what kind of connectivity you need? As various people have poi

Re: Yahoo and their mail filters..

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > This also pre-dates organized crime becoming heavily involved, and >> pre-dates the obsession with browser exploits. Back then a lot of spam was >> sent by semi-legitimate marketers from the US. These days all the bad guys >> are out to g

Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless

Leo Bicknell: Lastly, you've assumed that only a "smart phone" (not that the term > is well defined) needs an IP address. I believe this is wrong. > There are plenty of simpler phones (e.g. not a PDA, touch screen, > read your e-mail thing) that can use cellular data to WEP browse, > or to fetch

Re: Google search results leading to google "This site may harm your computer"

GMail classified this as phishing. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:34 PM, aljuhani wrote: > > Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within > google. > > The error message about the site may harm your computer is also displayed > in Arabic on google Saudi Arabia, www.google.

Hushmail postmaster

of days ago, but no joy and no ticket number. Alexander Harrowell

Re:

> Stop Making sense?

Re: Telecom Collapse?

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We haven't really had a major catastrophe where we've been totally > dependent on IP yet, AFIAK. Maybe all of the qos, call gapping and > the rest of the stuff the TDM networks do to deal with disasters > will be left

Re: Telecom Collapse?

Solar is civil defence - that goes for Node Bs as well as citizens. In the UK, I have absolutely no confidence in the reliability of our major cable op, because everywhere I go I find their street cabinets broken into, presumably by scum looking for copper (how long will they take to respond to th

Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision

OK. This seems to be a flaw in RIPE RIS, a pity because BGPlay is great. - original message - Subject:Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision From: Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 13/11/2008 8:05 pm alexander, all, On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:56:26PM +, Ale

Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision

It may be the North American NOG, but it's been said before that it functions as a GNOG, G for Global. I don't think Brazil is insignificant. I respect Todd's work greatly, but I think he's wrong on this point. - original message - Subject:Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision From: "Scot

Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs r equesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)

Have we yet had a peering war that was genuinely international, i.e. the partition was between net X in country Y and net Z in country W? Rather than between X's Y and Z's Y divisions, which wd both be in Y jurisdiction? - original message - Subject:Re: Internet partitioning event regula

Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Jim Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oddly enough, the ISP's in the region have not caught on to the potential > winfall of providing cost effective hosting locally, so therefore, the bulk > of the hosting for companies in the region is primarily done in the US,

Re: So why don't US citizens get this?

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Foster wrote: > > deadfake.com offer anonymised email services with no signup. Does this > > not immediately raise questions in itself? > > > > Or am I just unnaturally suspicious of such services? > > > > Have to admit

Re: Exploit for DNS Cache Poisoning - RELEASED

In what way is the EU's governance model the same as, or anything similar, to the UN's or ITU's? This argument gets increasingly silly. Hell, when did ITU last let someone randomly take over a chunk of the e164 name space? On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, David Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs

Well, at least the new TLDs will promote DNS-based cruft filtration. You can already safely ignore anything with a .name, .biz, .info, .tv suffix, to name just the worst. If only there was a way to get the cruft to move over into the new ones... On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, John Levine <[EMAIL

Re: [NANOG] [Nanog] P2P traffic optimization Was: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Mike Gonnason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This idea is what I am concerned about. Until the whole copyright mess > gets sorted out, wouldn't these iTracker supernodes be a goldmine of > logs for copyright lawyers? They would have a great deal of > information ab

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Christopher Morrow < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It strikes me that often just doing a reverse lookup on the peer > address would be 'good enough' to keep things more 'local' in a > network sense. Something like: > > 1) prefer peers with PTR's like mine (perhaps

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

a way to insert non-technical > > information about the network into the decision-making process. > > It's strange that noone in this thread mentioned P4P yet. Isn't there > someone involved in P4P at Nanog? > > http://www.dcia.info/activities/p4pwg/ > > IMHO, th

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

NCAP - Network Capability (or Cost) Announcement Protocol. On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I know, replying to your own email is sad ...) > > You could probably do this with a variant of DNS. Use an Anycast > > address common to everyone to solv

Re: [Nanog] ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Joe Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As far as I am concerned the killer application for IP multicast is > > *NOT* video, it's market data feeds from NYSE, NASDAQ, CBOT, etc. > > You can go compare the relative successes of Yahoo! Finance and YouTube. > > Whi

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the scenario above, I would expect the network operator to ban > connections to their DSL address block. Instead, they would put > some P2P clients in the rack with the topology guru middlebox > and direct the transactions there. Or

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

The good news about a DillTorrent solution is that at least the user and ISP interests are aligned; there's no reason for the ISP to have the guru lie to the users (because you just know someone'll try it). However, it does require considerable trust from the users that it will actually lead to a b

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Mark Smith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:58 +0100 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But there is another way. That is for software developers to build a > > modified client that depends on a topology guru for information on the > > networ

Re: Dubai impound ships suspected in cable damage

Lots - for values of lots including "practically all" - of ships use the AIS (Automatic Identification System), which broadcasts various details on radio. For an example application, try www.aisliverpool.org.uk On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:1

Re: NANOG 43 Preliminary Agenda

Hey, you missed the Abuse BOF sponsored by RBN, and my talk on "The IP Multimedia Subsystem - Like Jesus, with Routers" On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Scott Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Bitchin' network map there ras. Can I use it at work? Everyone keeps > telling me to use the p

Re: cooling door

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 10-20mW (or more) of nuclear power/gensets. > > While I would be much amused to see the response > in the area when Paul requested approval to site a > nuclear reactor on the Peninsula, I do not think > even Paul

Re: 2008.02.19 NANOG 42 Taiwan Earthquake Aftermath notes

Cf Renesys's superb analysis of the FLAG/FALCON/SMW4 cut, it looks like SingTel are the people to go to for reliable connectivity in Asia (they were the reconnection champs in January as well). On Feb 20, 2008 2:03 AM, Matthew Petach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, quick flurry of notes all

Re: SMTP addresses in <>

On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't > have an email problem at all. > > A > Becausewe wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperability for a "notmail" system tha

Is anyone aware of recent by-protocol traffic data in the public domain?

Europe, either. Alexander Harrowell

Re: Creating a crystal clear and pure Internet

On Nov 27, 2007 3:28 PM, John Musbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:38 AM, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > France anti-piracy initiative > > > > http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/index-olivennes231107.htm > > > > I don't understand, how in the world do th

Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads

Good idea, but there's a trust issue. If I were Comcast I might configure the box to lie about our backhaul network in order to spork the p2pers. On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't think of an obvious way for a p2p client to detect this. > > Work through middl

Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads

On 10/22/07, Andy Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In the UK at least, option 1) is financially more favourable for > ISPs, since the data flow is > vendor -> transit -> last mile -> end user, > rather than > end user -> last mile -> last mile -> end user. > > The last mil

Re: Can P2P applications learn to play fair on networks?

>MSO's typically understand this as eyeball heavy content >retrieval, not content generation I was under the impression Comcast advertised Internet access, which is read/write. Clearly I was mistaken... Really, the heart of the matter is that in doing this they are not being honest with their cu

Re: shameful-cabling gallery of infamy - does anybody know where

On Mon Sep 10 1:14 , Jay Hennigan sent: > > > > >Vinny Abello wrote: > > > >> One of the stranger things a field tech of ours encountered wasn't > necessarily > bad wiring (although it's not great), but the fact that the demarc was > located > next to the toilet in the bathroom. Naturally, the c

Re: Network Operations Guide

I'm impressed by this example of simple, decent, practical NANOG advice.

Re: peter lothberg's mother slashdotted

I'm aware of several mobile carriers who are buying into CRS-1s, usually at the same time they decide to pull fibre to their heavier-trafficked cell sites - which is generally just after HSPA/EV-DO Rev.A deployment. For hip hop fans: "Yes Yes Y'All, CRS-ONE, CRS-ONE, ROCK ON!"

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

Mythic Beasts Ltd, IIRC, names their machines after, uh, mythic beasts. Which is consistent, but not especially useful.. On 6/29/07, Leigh Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then you get some networks who name all the routers after cheeses or characters from bill and ben the flowerpot men. --

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

On 6/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:33:25 EDT, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ said: > I'm working on it ... But I think it will be really difficult to capture in > a couple of pages what the document try to explain ! The story goes: Richard Feynman, the late

Re: FBI tells the public to call their ISP for help

On 6/17/07, Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the 2+ years I have been working for an ISP I'm not aware of one customer that has gone over to one of our competitors because we identified and cut them off for an abuse issue. Most of them have been very grateful that we identified a probl

Re: 24x7 Support Strategies

Didn't we discuss the need for standard water connectors not so long ago? Water over Ethernet?

  1   2   >