I'm aware that I sent something via email inadvertently to the NANOG list.
Sorry about that. If I could remove it I would.
Sorry about that
Mike
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:58 PM Peter Potvin <
peter.pot...@accuristechnologies.ca> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Please verify you are emailing the correct per
Mike,
Please verify you are emailing the correct person. I have no idea how this
thread relates to a domain name transfer but I highly recommend verifying
the recipient of your emails to make sure they go to the right place.
Regards,
Peter
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM Mike Tindor wrote:
>
>
Sorry all for emaling to Nanog inadvertently. I sent a copuole of
nonrelevant posts
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:46 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>> I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for
>> wanting to avoid route server routing. For the content/cloud folk, I think
>> avoi
The ... AUTH code did NOT work
stbernadettewv.org Canceled - Invalid EPP/authorization key - Please
contact current registrar to obtain correct key
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:51 PM Mike Tindor wrote:
>
> Assuming the code is correct and that you will be getting the email,l you
> should get any e
Assuming the code is correct and that you will be getting the email,l you
should get any email any time.
stbernadettewv.org Domain awaiting transfer initiation
Mike
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:46 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>> I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for
>> w
>
>
> I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for
> wanting to avoid route server routing. For the content/cloud folk, I think
> avoiding it provides a mechanism via which they can screen for the utility
> of having to keep an exchange point node upgraded and optimized for
On 11/7/24 21:42, Randy Bush wrote:
i used to resist. my instinct is that the data plane and the control
plane should be congruent or you can have hard to debug issues[0].
but, as i have gotten older and lazier, and as you say, route servers
have gotten quite reliable, i have come over to the
Hi,
My experience with IPXO hasn't been very positive. Previously, our company
rented about 10 /24 blocks from IPXO for testing purposes because we were
running out of network IP addresses. Later on, IPXO reclaimed all of our IP
addresses due to "abuse" reasons, causing us thousands of dollars in
> You almost can't have lower effort peering than via an IXP's route
> server. Most of them these days are well run with IRR-based filtering
> and RPKI OV.
i used to resist. my instinct is that the data plane and the control
plane should be congruent or you can have hard to debug issues[0].
but,
* mark@tinka.africa (Mark Tinka) [Thu 07 Nov 2024, 19:25 CET]:
The paradigm shift happening in the content/cloud space is that the
"quick win value" eyeball networks enjoy from peering with the route
server to reach them does not appear to continue to be worth the
admin. effort for said content
*** N93 Early Registration Ends Sunday*
*Don't Miss Your Opportunity for Discounted Registration Rates*
Join us from Feb. 3-5, 2025 in Atlanta, GA for our next meeting, NANOG 93.
Dive into the latest in networking tech and trends!
*REGI
On 11/7/24 19:22, Will Hargrave wrote:
Hi Tom,
I don’t really think your last statement is true.
UK, and London in particular, is quite a dynamic market. At LONAP we see plenty
of networks connect and see an immediate “quick win” of traffic by connection
to our route-servers, where adopt
On 5 Nov 2024, at 16:56, Tom Beecher wrote:
>> Especially so if a few of the large content providers continue to pull
>> back from route servers and such.
> Content providers aren't leaving IXP's completely. They're still there,
> still paying monthly for ports and XCs. Still doing bilateral peeri
13 matches
Mail list logo
