The ... AUTH code did NOT work stbernadettewv.org Canceled - Invalid EPP/authorization key - Please contact current registrar to obtain correct key
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:51 PM Mike Tindor <mtin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Assuming the code is correct and that you will be getting the email,l you > should get any email any time. > > stbernadettewv.org Domain awaiting transfer initiation > Mike > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:46 PM Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote: > >> >>> I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for >>> wanting to avoid route server routing. For the content/cloud folk, I think >>> avoiding it provides a mechanism via which they can screen for the utility >>> of having to keep an exchange point node upgraded and optimized for service. >>> >> >> Plenty of eyeball networks will announce prefixes differently via a >> bilateral session vs a route server session vs DFZ, then come yelling >> because traffic isn't going the way they expected it to. There can be times >> that the administrative overhead of dealing with those folks far outweighs >> any financial or performance benefits. >> >> Route servers are generally useful, but can be a royal pain in the ass >> too, depending on how they're used. >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:35 PM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/7/24 21:42, Randy Bush wrote: >>> >>> i used to resist. my instinct is that the data plane and the control >>> plane should be congruent or you can have hard to debug issues[0]. >>> but, as i have gotten older and lazier, and as you say, route servers >>> have gotten quite reliable, i have come over to the route server side. >>> >>> >>> I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for >>> wanting to avoid route server routing. For the content/cloud folk, I think >>> avoiding it provides a mechanism via which they can screen for the utility >>> of having to keep an exchange point node upgraded and optimized for service. >>> >>> Mark. >>> >>
