https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0
The Federal Communications Commission today took action to ensure that
voice service providers meet their commitments and obligations to
implement STIR/SHAKEN standards to combat spoofed robocall scams.
Just looked and it is indeed fixed. Thanks again for everything!
--
Michael Zarglis
Eric Dugas wrote on 2022-02-17 12:17 PM:
I poked one of my contacts and he told me it was resolved. If it's
not, maybe give more details here so they can validate and follow up
if needed.
Eric
On Wed, Feb 1
I poked one of my contacts and he told me it was resolved. If it's not,
maybe give more details here so they can validate and follow up if needed.
Eric
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:06 PM Michael Zarglis via NANOG
wrote:
> Been dealing with an asymmetric routing issue and have not gotten
> anywher
> I had the same thought and dug into it. I traced the email chain backwards as
> well as the office phone. The email (and named employee) are legit as well as
> the switch serving the office line. Everything adds up. I don't have a reason
> to believe it's a scam. They also noted they will a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
> >
> > I have a note in to some FCC colleagues; I'll report back on what they
> say (assuming I hear back).
> >
>
> P.S. In the meantime, the claimed order on whic
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:09 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
>
> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-72A1.docx
>
> It says nothing about this. And certainly the FCC would not issue
> something with such a short date fuse; that letter appears to be a scam
> using scare and pressure
> On Feb 17, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> wrote:
>
> I have a note in to some FCC colleagues; I'll report back on what they say
> (assuming I hear back).
>
P.S. In the meantime, the claimed order on which the letter rests is
FCC-19-72A1 which you can find here, if you're in
I have a note in to some FCC colleagues; I'll report back on what they say
(assuming I hear back).
Anne
--
Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law)
Author: The Email Deliverability Handbo
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:22 PM wrote:
>
> >I believe that should be 19-72A1.
> >
> >https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-72A1.pdf
> >
> >Essentially, all services must be transitioned to fiber or wireless by
> August 2nd, 2022.
>
> I'm reading that document and that's not what it appe
Start with a neighborhood. A block. something. I'm sure there's a reason
behind why something is the way it is.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 13:13, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>
>
> I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:20 PM wrote:
>
> >I believe that should be 19-72A1.
> >
> >https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-72A1.pdf
> >
> >Essentially, all services must be transitioned to fiber or wireless by
> August 2nd, 2022.
>
> I'm reading that document and that's not what it appe
11 matches
Mail list logo
