Re: Frontier Tampa issues

2021-01-24 Thread David Hubbard
Yes, exactly same issue for us, and it has happened in the past a few years ago fortunately. Any chance the route takes a Level 3 (3356) path? I’m just theorizing here, but my belief is they have some kind of link aggregation in the path from TB to 3356 (or maybe just internal near some edge)

Frontier Tampa issues

2021-01-24 Thread Nick Olsen
Anyone else seeing weird things on Tampa/Bradenton FIOS connections? I've got three unrelated customers that cant establishes IPsec back to me. And a third that can't process credit cards out to their third party merchant. Customers are in 47.196.0.0/14. In All instances, I see the traffic leav

Re: Past policies versus present and future uses

2021-01-24 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Hi Matthew, I’m not sure I’ve succeded to explain it in previous emails. The requirement for the LACNIC policies about majority of usage *in the region* of the resources provided has been there for many years. I’m almost sure than since day 1, but will need to dig into older versions of the

Re: DoD IP Space

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Andrews
There's no error code. Customer only sees the message "DRM license resquest failed" on LG TV WebOS 3.8 or above. Translation “I use a broken GEOIP database that doesn’t handle IPv6 correctly. If you turn off IPv6 then the request will use IPv4 and it may work.”. Mark > On 25 Jan 2021, at 01:0

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
If you want services from LACNIC (as well as any other RIR), you need to sign the contracts (legal part) and know the policies. In that case you will reach *that* text in both pages. Google doesn't necessarily is right when doing translations, specially, because, as said several times, the form

Re: Past policies versus present and future uses

2021-01-24 Thread John Sage
On 1/24/21 3:15 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: Hi Jordi, I've adjusted the subject line to reflect the real thrust of this discussion. [edits Message Filters to include string "Past policies versus present and future uses" in Subject] [selects folder "NANOG" in Thunderbird: All Folders]

Past policies versus present and future uses

2021-01-24 Thread Matthew Petach
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:22 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: [...] > So, you end up with 2-3 RIRs allocations, not 5. And the real situation is > that 3 out of 5 RIRs communities, decided to be more relaxed on that > requirement, so you don’t need actually more than 1 o

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread John Sage
On 1/24/21 2:18 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, It is wast of time to complain or to modify practically obsoleted policy.     Masataka Ohta [selects folder "NANOG" in Thu

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread Masataka Ohta
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, It is wast of time to complain or to modify practically obsoleted policy. Masataka Ohta

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread Masataka Ohta
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: In the case of LACNIC it is spanish, it is clearly indicated in the web site, I can't see it clearly indicated in LACNIC web site, at all. Where is it? How does it stated? [Jordi] There may be some problem with your browser or Internet connectivity that is missing

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Cool nice work Ron! Maybe a new subject for what this is really about ... -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > On Jan 24, 2021, at 13:36, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG > wrote: > > Again, I'

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Again, I'm not saying is the best way, is what the community *decided* before I added a clarification. The 50% was not a change, just to make it explicit, what was the actual interpretation. If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, I could even support it, but I'm not

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
El 24/1/21 15:25, "NANOG en nombre de Masataka Ohta" escribió: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: > To summarize several responses: You don't. > In the case of LACNIC it is spanish, it is clearly indicated in the > web site, I can't see it clearly indicated in L

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread Masataka Ohta
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in the region. So, you don't know how most, if not all, ISPs are operating their network. > That will make your life more c

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread Masataka Ohta
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: To summarize several responses: You don't. In the case of LACNIC it is spanish, it is clearly indicated in the web site, I can't see it clearly indicated in LACNIC web site, at all. Where is it? How does it stated? > I've already informed LACNIC that

RE: DoD IP Space

2021-01-24 Thread Travis Garrison
I have personally seen the issue with streaming from a Samsung cell phone and the Disney+ app to a Google chrome cast and a regular not-smart TV. Travis -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Doug Barton Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 5:30 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: DoD

Re: Nice work Ron

2021-01-24 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in the region. That will make your life more complex, as you will need to obtain addresses from each RIR. In the worst case, if all them ask for the same: If yo