Can someone from Comcast please reach out? Looks like you're black holing
some prefixes.
-Tom
http://blog.multipath-tcp.org/blog/html/2015/07/24/korea.html
- Original Message -
From: Randy
To: Jaren Angerbauer ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Working with Spamhaus
- Original Message -
From: Jaren Angerbauer
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: W
- Original Message -
From: Jaren Angerbauer
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Working with Spamhaus
Hi,
As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days because of
> the extortion thing and the rather ..ahem .. "eccentric" nature o
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:48:11 +0900, Randy Bush said:
As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days
many folk do
Many of them your competitors? :) (Sorry, couldn't resist :)
Is that to be encouraged?
:)
-
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jaren Angerbauer
wrote:
> I work for Proofpoint -- we acquired SORBS back in 2011. There is
> delisting (via SORBS support ticket). Additionally, there is NO CHARGE to
> be delisted.
Hi Jaren,
The big problem I remember with SORBS from my ISP days was that if
t
Anyone again seeing level3 packet loss tonight leaving the east coast going
west bound? In my case to Dallas.
It takes no effort at all. You just do the same thing as has been done with
every previous version of windows:
When it asks for a LOCAL account and password, give it one. When it asks if
you want to do a Microsoft Account", say no thank-you. Mind you, it does ask
you about 8 times if you ar
It's what they call a free country
Those that don't use it don't use it, and those who do are free to do so
--srs
> On 31-Jul-2015, at 4:56 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:34 -0400, Jaren Angerbauer
>> wrote:
>> I work for Proofpoint -- we acquired SORBS back in 2011.
>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:34 -0400, Jaren Angerbauer
wrote:
I work for Proofpoint -- we acquired SORBS back in 2011.
Hint: The Internet has a LONG memory.
The liberal and numerous dropping of "for free" makes me laugh. "You" knew
the tainted nature of what you were buying. Nobody, to this
Hello NANOG members!
We are once again approaching the annual NANOG election and appointment
time. In addition to the "call for nominations" message at the opening of
the process, the following is an overview and timeline of the actual
election process. We encourage those in the community who are
BGP Update Report
Interval: 23-Jul-15 -to- 30-Jul-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9829 271611 6.5% 247.4 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone,IN
2 - AS38197
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 31 21:14:46 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Hi,
As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days because of
> the extortion thing and the rather ..ahem .. "eccentric" nature of it's
> owner.
>
and
> I see you've never had the pleasure of dealing with SORBS. All it takes is
> *ONE* message - EVER - to be instantly, and foreve
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:48:11 +0900, Randy Bush said:
> > As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days
>
> many folk do
Many of them your competitors? :) (Sorry, couldn't resist :)
pgpO2jdXrpYvy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> As for SORBS, I'm not aware of anyone that uses it these days
many folk do
randy
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For hi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:45 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:42:46 +0530
>> > Glen Kent wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > Is there a reason why this is often done so? Is th
A couple of months ago I purchased a Flexbox V3 and a pile of SFP and SFP+ for
$dayjob. The parts arrived in less than a week and the Flexbox V3 (and
webapp) works well with our Macs.
We are a satisfied customer.
Eriks
---
Eriks Rugelis
Sr. Consultant
Netidea Inc.
T: +1.416.876.0740
> On Jul
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:07 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:18:10 -0500
Jason Baugher wrote:
In one case, when we were having an issue with a SIP trunk, we
re-numbered our end to another IP in the same subnet. Same path from
A
>
>> In one case, when we were having an issue with a SIP trunk, we re-numbered
>> our end to another IP in the same subnet. Same path from A to Z, but the
>> packet loss mysteriously disappeared using the new IP.
>
> lag hash put you on a congested fiber?
Or perhaps a switch fabric module geeke
https://github.com/jlmcgraw/networkUtilities/blob/master/parseMlsQosInterfaceStatistics.pl
I whipped up this perl script as part of some troubleshooting I was
doing and I'd thought I send it out to NANOG in case anyone else might
find it useful (Note that you may need to install some additional
Well, I meant the VZB network. The landline network transaction is confirmed by
their press release.
Frontier knows what they're getting into. They bought our Verizon landline
operations years ago.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original
I work on E911 systems and the infrastructure that monitors E911 call
distribution and integrity. California E911 is part of a nationwide management
system operated out of the DC area. California’s E911 exceeds all the mandated
reliability requirements. The most problematic part of E911 is cellu
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> I am a CLEC operating in California west, and I collocate with verizon. Yes,
> Verizon is proposing to sell it's wireline assets to Frontier and become
> effectively an all-wireless carrier.
clec functions don't necessarily equate to 'verizon busi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:07 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:18:10 -0500
> Jason Baugher wrote:
>
>> In one case, when we were having an issue with a SIP trunk, we
>> re-numbered our end to another IP in the same subnet. Same path from
>> A to Z, but the packet loss mysteriously
On 07/31/2015 06:27 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Can anyone else back that up (or refute it)?
I am a CLEC operating in California west, and I collocate with verizon.
Yes, Verizon is proposing to sell it's wireline assets to Frontier and
become effectively an all-wireless carrier.
Frontier is
Le sigh ..
Hotmail/Outlook/Live
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/getsupport?oaspworkflow=start_1.0.0.0&wfname=capsub&productkey=edfsmsbl3&locale=en-us
Google/Gmail
https://support.google.com/mail/contact/bulk_send_new?rd=1
AOL
https://postmaster.aol.com/trouble-ticket
Yahoo
https://io.help.y
Can anyone else back that up (or refute it)?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Colton Conor"
To: "Robert Glover"
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group (nanog@nanog.org)"
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 7
Word on the street is that Verizon business/enterprise is about to be sold
to Centrylink as well. Seems Verizon soon will only be Verizon Wireless.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Robert Glover wrote:
> On 7/30/2015 9:26 AM, Matthew Black wrote:
>
>> Verizon sent me a letter the other day stat
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:18:10 -0500
Jason Baugher wrote:
> In one case, when we were having an issue with a SIP trunk, we
> re-numbered our end to another IP in the same subnet. Same path from
> A to Z, but the packet loss mysteriously disappeared using the new
> IP. It sure seems like they are th
31 matches
Mail list logo
