On Jul 27, 2013, at 9:00 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> ...
> In other words --- they would have passed a knowledge proof, showing
> they deserve the right to bypass "Level 1 call center drones".
>
> E.g. to gain enhanced access in a world with 'an additional level of
> whois access'
> Step 1...
>
On 7/27/13, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:18:52 -0500, Jimmy Hess said:
> I have to admit that this is the biggest can-o-worms suggestion > I've seen
> all week.
> (Hint: our org chart says I work in our Network Storage and Backup
> group - the lurker in the next cubicl
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:18:52 -0500, Jimmy Hess said:
> authenticated with an implied promise that only vetted
> individuals with a proven network engineering experience
> background can see the 'additional' information,
I have to admit that this is the biggest can-o-worms suggestion
I've
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Aaron Wendel
wrote:
> On 7/14/2013 3:37 PM, Richard Golodner wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 09:36 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>>> in
>>> fact, they were all likely in the same rotten boat.
>>>
>>
>> Why I love open source. Look at my mail, track my web s
> On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> For the folks who aren't aware, there is working being done on a proposal
>> for a complete do-over of WHOIS:
>> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130703_rebooting_whois/
>> I don't believe this work address the regional registry information, w
On 7/27/2013 7:20 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
> They cut off all access
Correction... that didn't come across the right way.
They didn't just cut everyone's access off. What I meant was that anyone
who didn't re-signup by filling out a rather comprehensive form, with
very pointed questions about their
On 7/27/2013 6:11 PM, John Curran wrote:
> Excellent pointer Frank...
I confess, I haven't followed this conversation very closely (which
meandered around much, given the random few messages I saw.. who has the
time to read them all?). So forgive me if I'm repeating some of the info
already covere
On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> For the folks who aren't aware, there is working being done on a proposal
> for a complete do-over of WHOIS:
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130703_rebooting_whois/
> I don't believe this work address the regional registry information, which
> i
For the folks who aren't aware, there is working being done on a proposal
for a complete do-over of WHOIS:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130703_rebooting_whois/
I don't believe this work address the regional registry information, which
is what initiated the discussion, but this conversation has c
- Forwarded message from ISC Security Officer
-
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:46:50 -0700
From: ISC Security Officer
To: bind-annou...@lists.isc.org, bind-work...@lists.isc.org,
bind-us...@lists.isc.org
Subject: Notice: BIND Security Jul2013 CVE2013-4854
IMPORTANT: The security issue desc
10 matches
Mail list logo
