On 12/12/11 02:05 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Vitkovsky, Adam
>> [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com] Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19 To:
>> Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>>
>>> and models that doesn't take "we m
Two I know and have used are Alertra and SiteRecon.
-Original Message-
From: Express Web Systems [mailto:mailingli...@expresswebsystems.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:19 PM
To: 'Derrick H.'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: recommendations for external montioring services?
>
> You
>
> You may want to check out http://www.panopta.com/ Works well for me
> with reasonable pricing.
>
+1 to Panopta. We have been using them for the past two years and they have
been very solid. We have even put in a few feature requests (voice
notifications was one we specifically requested) and
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
> On 2011-12-12, at 4:22 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
>> I guess most (i.e. those
>> which aren't Akamai) are more concerned with making money than with
>> delivering
>> a good service to the end user.
>
> Really? I always thought that high
On Dec 12, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> On 2011-12-12, at 4:22 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
>> I guess most (i.e. those
>> which aren't Akamai) are more concerned with making money than with
>> delivering
>> a good service to the end user.
>
> Really? I always thought that higher pr
On 2011-12-12, at 4:22 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> I guess most (i.e. those
> which aren't Akamai) are more concerned with making money than with delivering
> a good service to the end user.
Really? I always thought that higher profits and buying transit were mutually
exclusive relative to hi
On Mon Dec 12, 2011 at 10:11:54PM +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Akamai will peer with you anywhere and i doubt LLNW will give you trouble.
LLNW are restictive on peering.
> L3, well, they run a superb network and even more superb pricing, so why
> would they peer with anyone ;)
And as I u
Hi!
I believe Akamai,
LLNW, & L3 are the only companies that stream movies for Netflix. Peer with
the CDNs to save your transit.
That would be good if more than one of those CDNs peered openly.
So what one doesnt?
Akamai will peer with you anywhere and i doubt LLNW will give you trouble.
On Mon Dec 12, 2011 at 03:10:20PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I believe Akamai,
> LLNW, & L3 are the only companies that stream movies for Netflix. Peer with
> the CDNs to save your transit.
That would be good if more than one of those CDNs peered openly.
Simon
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:10:54PM -0600, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2
> mail servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers
> (including lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking),
> and one inbound mx
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Edward Dore
wrote:
> Take a look at Panopta - we use it to compliment our internal monitoring and
> find it great compared to some of the systems we've used in the past
> (Pingdom, Binary Canary).
>
> The interface is easy to use and responsive, we don't get fal
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2 mail
> servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers (including
> lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking), and one inbound mx.
> A few
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/11/11 19:49 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>>> Simple, keep traffic off paid ip transit circuits
>>>
>> (I think joel's point was: "peer with amazon, done-and-done")
>
> also prob
Take a look at Panopta - we use it to compliment our internal monitoring and
find it great compared to some of the systems we've used in the past (Pingdom,
Binary Canary).
The interface is easy to use and responsive, we don't get false positives and
there are a good range of checks. There's an
I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2 mail
servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers (including
lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking), and one inbound mx. A
few network points to ping to ensure connectivity throughout my sys
The client just contacted us again to say that their issue has been
resolved. We are still waiting on a updated trace-route to see what has
changed.
Regards
Cody
> Not from Verizon, but Verizon's been having routing problems all weekend,
> getting much worse yesterday. The nexus may be in the Ve
We have a client that is complaining of connectivity issues and his
trace-routes are stopping inside Verizon's network.
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-151.verizon-gni.net [98.116.13
4.1]
3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms G11-0-0-1251.NYCMNY-LCR-1
How much was the pricing and is it unlimited BW?
I may be interested too depending on costs
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:03:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: Verizon 3G/4G Mobile Internet Sales Contact?
> From: tknch...@gmail.com
> To: paul4...@gmail.com
> CC: nanog@nanog.org
>
> Hello,
>
> Someon
Hello,
Someone contacted me offlist and got me direct contact info to someone at
VZ who know exactly what I was looking for and was very helpful. And the
pricing is quite fair :)
Thanks to everyone who sent me info.
chris
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:10 AM, PC wrote:
> From my experience:
>
> IP
Yes www.speedtest.net & www.gotomypc are also inaccessible or very slow
along with many other sites. Experiencing these problems in Nassau and
Westchester County on consumer fios.
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon@brandontek.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11
I am using what you are looking for today with VPN connectivity and it has been
discussed on this list previously. There are some things you should be aware of
with static ip. Contact me offline and I may be able to put you in contact with
someone.
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Finne
Yes I am in Rockland. I failed to mentioned that I was having issues with
consumer FIOS.
Is anyone with Verizon on this list? This morning www.cisco.com and www.nfl.com
works now.
They didn't last night.
There are still some websites that won't load or slow to load
> From: mh...@ox.co
Both At&T and Sprint have a static offering as well.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: chris [mailto:tknch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:44 AM
To: PC
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Verizon 3G/4G Mobile Internet Sales Contact?
On that note, any other carriers who do h
I am using what is called Verizon Private Network on 4G witch gives me
private Static IPs.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:10 AM
To: chris
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Verizon 3G/4G Mobile Internet Sales Contact?
>Fr
On that note, any other carriers who do have static IP offerings at a
reasonable price? Just looking for OOB really, unlimited data would be nice
too so it doesnt have to be worried about
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:10 AM, PC wrote:
> From my experience:
>
> IPV4 Static IPs nor private IP service
>From my experience:
IPV4 Static IPs nor private IP service are currently available on the 4g
service (I asked).
Even the routable IPV6 Static IPs can not receive remote traffic (at least
they failed to get ESP traffic when I tried to build a VPN with them
because the ipv4 address provided was ca
Hello,
If anyone has any contact info for the correct department within Verizon
which handles getting a mobile internet service via 3G/4G, that would be a
huge help. I am trying to avoid the usual Verizon runaround of being
transferred from dept to dept because no one has any idea what I'm talking
DSLReports Verizon forum reports routing issues in Westchester, Rockland and
Nassau. I tried a few traceroutes this morning. Some went through fine, others
died at the first hop within Verizon.
People are reporting mixed results calling Verizon. Some techs are saying it's
a known issues, others
On Monday, December 12, 2011 05:17:08 PM Vitkovsky, Adam
wrote:
> However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP
> that can't run their business the way they would like
> Maybe they'd like to build an mpls core which right now
> is not possible with only ipv6 at hand I'd like to see
> t
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19
> To: Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>
> > and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account
> and
> and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account and have
> a contingency plan for that *deserves* to be soundly mocked and ridiculed in
> public.
That's right
However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP that can't run their
business the way they would like
Ma
31 matches
Mail list logo
