In message , Kenny Sallee w
rites:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6
> >
> > Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can visit this website
> > and any people can access this website over the world
> >
Hi all
Thank you so much for your help
I am not using cisco. From my understanding from your mail, I should
configure bgp as the following. Right?
What do I should pay attention also?
Seattle: network 66.49.130.0/24
announce out permit: 66.49.130.0/24
announce out deny 0.0.0.0
deny in 66.49.13
In message <4e08af25.4090...@network-services.uoregon.edu>, John Kemp writes:
> The more optimistic number was that something like 20% - 30% of clients
> could retrieve an IPV6-Only Literal URL. So yeah, still sad, but there
> is some potential there.
Given most of that traffic is going through
The SRX line is nice for some uses, particularly with recent software updates
that have fixed things like using IPv6 on vlan interfaces.
The SRX is not going to be the choice for an edge router that needs to do BGP
and/or 1 Gb/s+ of traffic.
The SRX pretty much does everything in software, whe
Heh, I spent about 3mo evaluating/testing SRX's and I agree they had
potential but left /a lot/ to be desired.
-Jeremy
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Sorry... I misspoke. My comments related to the SRX series and not the MX.
>
> The MX is a fine product in my experience.
Sorry... I misspoke. My comments related to the SRX series and not the MX.
The MX is a fine product in my experience.
Owen
On Jun 25, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Howard Hart wrote:
>
> We have a couple installed as our edge routers.
>
> Pluses - solid as a rock, easy to administer, and will take some
I think they have the potential to be great products. Unfortunately, services
JunOS
is a serious handicap if you want to use it as a Juniper Router and not a JunOS
speaking netscreen.
Owen
On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> I would love to know the same I am looking at the MX l
On Jun 25, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
>> On 6/25/2011 7:43 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
>>> Take a guess what the datacenter our equipment is currently hosted in uses.
>>> Yet another reason to be glad of a datacenter move that's
On 6/27/11 1:19 PM, Matthew Black wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:29:14 -0400
Jay Ashworth wrote:
The North American Electric Reliability Council is planning to relax
the standards for how closely power utilities must hold to 60.00Hz.
Here's my absolute favorite quote of all time:
Tweaking th
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:29:14 -0400
Jay Ashworth wrote:
The North American Electric Reliability Council is planning to relax
the standards for how closely power utilities must hold to 60.00Hz.
Here's my absolute favorite quote of all time:
Tweaking the power grid's frequency is expensive and
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6
>
> Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can visit this website
> and any people can access this website over the world
>
>
I did this by creating a 6to4 tunnel to a relay prov
On 6/26/11 5:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <20110627002625.4c8531137...@drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes
> :
>>
>> In message , Deric Kwok
>> wr
>> ites:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6
>>>
>>> Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can vi
Dear NANOG
We really appreciate response to the survey.
We could get 63 response from global operators groups.
And we had published result of the survey as internet-draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02
We would like to refer the survey result to improve v
13 matches
Mail list logo
