Heh, I spent about 3mo evaluating/testing SRX's and I agree they had potential but left /a lot/ to be desired.
-Jeremy On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Sorry... I misspoke. My comments related to the SRX series and not the MX. > > The MX is a fine product in my experience. > > Owen > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Howard Hart wrote: > > > > > We have a couple installed as our edge routers. > > > > Pluses - solid as a rock, easy to administer, and will take some > extremely high packet rates for relatively low cost (important for us since > we use them for VoIP traffic). If you're approaching the capacity of a 1GB > uplink, I highly recommend these as your first step to 10 GB. > > > > Minuses - careful on your MX80 version. The MX80-48T includes a built in > 48 port 1 GigE switch, but we've had compatibility issues with it and other > vendors switches. The modular version that replaces the MX80-48T costs quite > a bit more, but it does give you a lot more connection and compatibility > options. > > > > Howard Hart > > > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:37 PM, "Ryan Finnesey" > <ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com> wrote: > > > >> I would love to know the same I am looking at the MX line as well for a > >> new network build-out > >> > >> Cheers > >> Ryan > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chris [mailto:behrnetwo...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:29 AM > >> To: nanog@nanog.org > >> Subject: What do you think about the Juniper MX line? > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've been doing some research into using the MX line of Juniper routers > >> and was interested in hearing people's experiences (the good, bad, and > >> ugly). What do you like about them? What do you dislike? > >> Where are you putting them in your network? Where are you not putting > >> them? Why? What other platforms would you consider and why? I hope to > >> hear some candid responses, but feel free to respond privately if you > >> need to. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > > >
