Sorry... I misspoke. My comments related to the SRX series and not the MX. The MX is a fine product in my experience.
Owen On Jun 25, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Howard Hart wrote: > > We have a couple installed as our edge routers. > > Pluses - solid as a rock, easy to administer, and will take some extremely > high packet rates for relatively low cost (important for us since we use them > for VoIP traffic). If you're approaching the capacity of a 1GB uplink, I > highly recommend these as your first step to 10 GB. > > Minuses - careful on your MX80 version. The MX80-48T includes a built in 48 > port 1 GigE switch, but we've had compatibility issues with it and other > vendors switches. The modular version that replaces the MX80-48T costs quite > a bit more, but it does give you a lot more connection and compatibility > options. > > Howard Hart > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:37 PM, "Ryan Finnesey" > <ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com> wrote: > >> I would love to know the same I am looking at the MX line as well for a >> new network build-out >> >> Cheers >> Ryan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris [mailto:behrnetwo...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:29 AM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: What do you think about the Juniper MX line? >> >> Hello, >> >> I've been doing some research into using the MX line of Juniper routers >> and was interested in hearing people's experiences (the good, bad, and >> ugly). What do you like about them? What do you dislike? >> Where are you putting them in your network? Where are you not putting >> them? Why? What other platforms would you consider and why? I hope to >> hear some candid responses, but feel free to respond privately if you >> need to. >> >> Thanks! >> >>
